My fight with homeland security
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
26. May 2010 @ 05:57 |
Link to this message
|
"the real bad guys shoot back"
No, the good guys shoot back...the bad guys start the shooting, and call it a "preemptive strike"
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
26. May 2010 @ 06:29 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by KillerBug: "the real bad guys shoot back"
No, the good guys shoot back...the bad guys start the shooting, and call it a "preemptive strike"
No the good guys shoot and the bad guys take the evidence and get out of their quick smart.then again there are a lot of dumb bad guys that will try and win a shoot out just to make a point.
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|
BigDEEZZY
Newbie
|
26. May 2010 @ 12:34 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by xboxdvl2: @big deezzy its been a while hows the court case going????
well I am in discovery right now and waiting to see what they have on me, i cant have a pc in my home so it hard to get on, im now a 4th waver they can search a seize any time they want while on OR cant break any laws or have a xbox 360 in my house this is going to take a while.
|
BigDEEZZY
Newbie
|
26. May 2010 @ 12:46 |
Link to this message
|
and just for the record I dont do anything anymore I had to remove all pcs from my house.
I don't download
I don't sell
i don't do anything on a pc except for work at my job
Also I was just trying to help people protect there privacy with there data that's all I think this program would help
Im never gonna do it a again this shit is not worth it.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 26. May 2010 @ 12:47
|
BigDEEZZY
Newbie
|
26. May 2010 @ 12:54 |
Link to this message
|
I done posting but i will tell you the end results it will take while as court is going to be long stay safe and have a good year
|
BIFF0
Member
|
26. May 2010 @ 15:12 |
Link to this message
|
That guy was just spamming his software right?
|
Senior Member
|
27. May 2010 @ 01:48 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by BigDEEZZY: Originally posted by xboxdvl2: @big deezzy its been a while hows the court case going????
well I am in discovery right now and waiting to see what they have on me, i cant have a pc in my home so it hard to get on, im now a 4th waver they can search a seize any time they want while on OR cant break any laws or have a xbox 360 in my house this is going to take a while.
I didnt have a computer for a while.You should be able to access a computer with internet access in a local library if you want to come on here and post or browse the web.
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
29. May 2010 @ 05:37 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by xboxdvl2: Originally posted by KillerBug: "the real bad guys shoot back"
No, the good guys shoot back...the bad guys start the shooting, and call it a "preemptive strike"
No the good guys shoot and the bad guys take the evidence and get out of their quick smart.then again there are a lot of dumb bad guys that will try and win a shoot out just to make a point.
If they were the good guys, they would not ambush people that are minding their own business. The police and military sometimes go after real criminals, but they spend most of their time arresting innocent, non-violent offenders. They do this in order to force people to use dangerous drugs like alcohol. By taking non-violent innocent people, they are kidnappers. Doing it with the goal of inspiring fear that will force people to change their peaceful ways makes them terrorists.
The terrorists are the bad guys...and most of them wear blue.
|
chris1980
Suspended permanently
|
29. May 2010 @ 22:48 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: If they were the good guys, they would not ambush people that are minding their own business. The police and military sometimes go after real criminals, but they spend most of their time arresting innocent, non-violent offenders. They do this in order to force people to use dangerous drugs like alcohol. By taking non-violent innocent people, they are kidnappers. Doing it with the goal of inspiring fear that will force people to change their peaceful ways makes them terrorists.
The terrorists are the bad guys...and most of them wear blue.
"Minding their own business"??? Their business is torturing young girls and detonating IED's in crowds of women and children from 500 metres away, they are cowards. So you are saying that it is wrong to ambush insurgents... what do you think they do? That is one of the most inaccurate posts I have seen. You have probably never been in the army, all your info is coming from civilian reporters that don't know shit. How about you spend a week in Afghanistan and see if you have the same views on terrorism.
I have got no idea what you mean by "the police and military sometimes go after real criminals". So insurgents aren't criminals? They are model citizens? Your post borderlines on Islamic extremism.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 29. May 2010 @ 22:49
|
Senior Member
|
30. May 2010 @ 00:40 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by chris1980: Quote: If they were the good guys, they would not ambush people that are minding their own business. The police and military sometimes go after real criminals, but they spend most of their time arresting innocent, non-violent offenders. They do this in order to force people to use dangerous drugs like alcohol. By taking non-violent innocent people, they are kidnappers. Doing it with the goal of inspiring fear that will force people to change their peaceful ways makes them terrorists.
The terrorists are the bad guys...and most of them wear blue.
"Minding their own business"??? Their business is torturing young girls and detonating IED's in crowds of women and children from 500 metres away, they are cowards. So you are saying that it is wrong to ambush insurgents... what do you think they do? That is one of the most inaccurate posts I have seen. You have probably never been in the army, all your info is coming from civilian reporters that don't know shit. How about you spend a week in Afghanistan and see if you have the same views on terrorism.
I have got no idea what you mean by "the police and military sometimes go after real criminals". So insurgents aren't criminals? They are model citizens? Your post borderlines on Islamic extremism.
Its nothing to do with islamic extremists.hes just pointing out law enforcements acts just as bad as criminals and sometimes they do.As for the Army i know they need to defend the country but from what I've heard from people who have been in the army they take model citizens who want to improve their country and turn them in to cold blooded killers.
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|
chris1980
Suspended permanently
|
30. May 2010 @ 02:07 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: Its nothing to do with islamic extremists.hes just pointing out law enforcements acts just as bad as criminals and sometimes they do.
But the law enforcement agencies aren't doing this towards innocents are they? No, a majority of the time they act against criminals, people who have chosen their fate.
Quote: As for the Army i know they need to defend the country but from what I've heard from people who have been in the army they take model citizens who want to improve their country and turn them in to cold blooded killers.
Well, I was in the Australian SAS for 5 years and I never knew anybody that was a 'cold blooded killer'. We may have had to kill people in cold-blood, especially soldiers in the sniper troops, but we did feel remorse. All the reports about Iraq and Afghanistan are coming from journalists that don't know shit from shinola. They think that a search on the internet can give them an insight into what the soldiers face, they don't have a clue.
I mean, even if the soldier is changed when they come back, that is not the armies fault. Anybody that goes to war will be changed, there is no way to prevent that.
Quote: Its nothing to do with islamic extremists
I'm pretty sure insurgents would believe something similar too "The terrorists are the bad guys...and most of them wear blue". Anybody who thinks that the UN is as bad as the rag head scum that are killing our soldiers everyday has either got something seriously wrong with them and or haven't got a clue what they are talking about
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 30. May 2010 @ 02:13
|
Senior Member
|
30. May 2010 @ 02:55 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: I'm pretty sure insurgents would believe something similar too "The terrorists are the bad guys...and most of them wear blue". Anybody who thinks that the UN is as bad as the rag head scum that are killing our soldiers everyday has either got something seriously wrong with them and or haven't got a clue what they are talking about
Anyone that terrorises people is a terrorists whether they are law enforcement or if there an outlaw or an Islamic extremists.
Quote: . Anybody who thinks that the UN is as bad as the rag head scum that are killing our soldiers everyday has either got something seriously wrong with them and or haven't got a clue what they are talking about
your in their country running around with guns.they probably think their defending themselves or their country???
Quote: But the law enforcement agencies aren't doing this towards innocents are they? No, a majority of the time they act against criminals, people who have chosen their fate.
they act against people they think are criminals and I'm sure alot of them are innocent.the CIA has the power to detain anyone they think is a terrorist and torture them and deny them access to rights without any real proof.david hicks is a perfect example.police have the right to shoot or taser anyone that raises there voice to them.
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|
ddp
Moderator
|
31. May 2010 @ 00:42 |
Link to this message
|
xboxdvl2, cia can only do that outside of us territories & allied nations except with their cooperation.
|
chris1980
Suspended permanently
|
31. May 2010 @ 04:12 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: Anyone that terrorises people is a terrorists whether they are law enforcement or if there an outlaw or an Islamic extremists.
True, but if you want to go by that definition then the President is a terrorist, every soldier is a terrorist... pretty much every one who has ever raised their voice at someone else is a terrorist.
Quote: your in their country running around with guns.they probably think their defending themselves or their country???
No, a lot of the time insurgents do not directly fire upon soldiers, most times they are too scared. Instead they will use IED's to injure military and civilian personnel. And it's not always their country; East Timor and the Kopassus invasion for example.
Quote: they act against people they think are criminals and I'm sure alot of them are innocent.the CIA has the power to detain anyone they think is a terrorist and torture them and deny them access to rights without any real proof.david hicks is a perfect example.
David Hicks was captured by the Northern Alliance, not the CIA. He is a terrorist, he trained with al Qaeda and he fought with them.
Quote: police have the right to shoot or taser anyone that raises there voice to them.
Civilians have the right to shoot anybody that acts aggressively towards them also (in specific circumstances). So you are saying that the police should not be allowed to do this though the public are?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 31. May 2010 @ 04:14
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
3 product reviews
|
31. May 2010 @ 07:52 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by KillerBug: Nah...the only way to protect yourself is to place shotgun shells between all your hard drives, wired up to electronic detonators...if the cops bust in, you press the button and all the evidence goes up in a roar of smoke and fire!
feck that man, do that here in ireland and you're a terrorist not only that but they get the british police for you then,lol
ALL INFO FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSE ONLY
HOOTER007
|