|
anyway to make encoding using nero faster? takes like 2 hours for on cd
|
|
|
kmanpo
Newbie
|
20. December 2004 @ 13:41 |
Link to this message
|
|
is there anyway to encode videos faster? im using nero burning rom 2 and it takes like 2 hours for one video thats not even that long in the first place. help!
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
aldaco12
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. December 2004 @ 03:47 |
Link to this message
|
No, sorry. MPEG encoding is a hard stuff. If you do it with TMPGEnc with motion search precision=highest quality(very slow) it's not so unusual that the encoding takes too much time.
This is one of the main reasons I prefere 1) do the encoding with TMPGEnc 2) make the VCD image 3) burn it. Did tou read the 'sticky' thread http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/110106 ?
If for some reasons the CD burning aborts (Bad CD, black out...) you don't waste so much time!
|
|
shiroh
Account closed as per user's own request
|
21. December 2004 @ 20:04 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
|
vortex742
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
21. December 2004 @ 20:15 |
Link to this message
|
LOOK, USE Nero 6.6 ENTERPRISE MAKES GOOD VCD'S
|
|
aldaco12
AfterDawn Addict
|
22. December 2004 @ 04:28 |
Link to this message
|
My question, siroh, is: CCE is a bit faster, but how is the quality of the final MPEG?
You see, I could also choose in TMPGenc: Settings ___ Motion Search Precision = motion estimate search(fast)', and TMPGEnc would be a lot faster, but paying this with lot of quality of the final encoded movie. I don't care for a couple of hours, but for the quality of the final (S)VCD I can make.
|
Staff Member
2 product reviews
|
22. December 2004 @ 04:37 |
Link to this message
|
CCE will give you higher quality for MPEG-2. TMPGEnc, on the other hand, is far superior for MPEG-1.
|
|
rimland
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
22. December 2004 @ 07:07 |
Link to this message
|
it takes my computer 6 hours to encode 1hr of DV.
That's just AVI to MPG.
Dell 4550 P4 2.4 640MB Ram
190 gb 7200 rpm hd
64 meg video agp
|
|
stardust
Member
|
22. December 2004 @ 08:58 |
Link to this message
|
|
Does anybody have any experiences with MainConcept Mpeg Encoder?
|
|
kmanpo
Newbie
|
22. December 2004 @ 11:39 |
Link to this message
|
i got the TMPGEnc and tried it out for the first time but there was problems. when i went to browse for video source and selected the video i wanted to convert to mpeg, it keeps saying that it can not open the file or it is unsupported. why is this happening? my other encoder programs dont do this. i even tried a different video file and it still does the same thing. Is something wrong with TMPGEnc?
|
|
rimland
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
22. December 2004 @ 12:20 |
Link to this message
|
|
it works fine (very slow) for me...
what's the file's extension and what step in the process do you get the msg ? Is it after the encode ?
|
|
stardust
Member
|
23. December 2004 @ 09:43 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
|
rimland
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
23. December 2004 @ 09:54 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
|
kmanpo
Newbie
|
23. December 2004 @ 18:24 |
Link to this message
|
HEY STARDUST HOW'S IT GOIN? I TRIED WHAT YOU SUGGESTED USING THE ENVIRONMENTAL SETTINGS AND IT WORKED BUT THERE STILL IS A BIG PROBLEM. THE AVI FILE LOADED BUT WHEN I CLICK ON START IT SAID{CANT LOAD "P3PACKAGE.DLL"} AND IT WOULD NOT START TO ENCODE. I DONT KNOW WHAT THIS MEANS AND I STILL NEED HELP PLEASE, THANKS
|
|
kmanpo
Newbie
|
23. December 2004 @ 19:20 |
Link to this message
|
|
I EVEN EXTRACTED ALL OF THE FILES IN WINZIP AND IT STILL SAYS CANT LOAD P3PACKAGE.DLL. WHAT'S GOING ON
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
stardust
Member
|
24. December 2004 @ 02:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 24. December 2004 @ 02:18
|
