User User name Password  
   
Monday 6.4.2026 / 14:56
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > software specific discussion > dvd shrink forum > 3.2 vs 3.1.7.5
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
3.2 vs 3.1.7.5
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
austurk
Newbie
_
8. September 2004 @ 20:17 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
hi everyone,

Thanks for to everyone answering my deep analysis question, appreicate the help :)

i got this problem for people using 3.2 and 3.175

put deep anaysis aside,
i tried to backup a movie using 3.2 (no deep analysis or sharp picture) started encoding immidiately and time estimated completion time was 1 hr 40 min+,
then i stopped it and opened 3.175 (previous version of shrink as you know) and started encoding and estimated time was 50 min. ???!!!!!

now, 3.2 takes double the time to encode means:
1- the back up will be a better quality
2- what the hell?? there is something wrong withit? :)

for people who have used both, please tell me which one is better? as most of us know some softwares mess up in their latest versions such as msn messenger. is this one of those cases?
cheers everyone :)
afterdawn.com > forums > software specific discussion > dvd shrink forum > 3.2 vs 3.1.7.5
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2026 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork