|
Halo3
|
|
|
Floodking
Newbie
|
8. December 2004 @ 11:38 |
Link to this message
|
|
I already played Halo3 and it was awsome! U find something out that u would never believe. it makes the whole story make sense.
truth Quote:there are some that said this day would never come, wht are they to say now?
My version: there some that said this day would never come, what are those retards to say now?
floodking- the dummest of all flood
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
FullySik
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
9. December 2004 @ 01:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
how could u play it if it hasn't been made yet
SiK bRo
|
|
fadedindi
Junior Member
|
10. December 2004 @ 11:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
How did you play it?
If you have played Halo 3, then I have played Halo 4.
Sound good?
-Dave
|
|
big_g-man
Member
|
10. December 2004 @ 12:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
actually i heard they made Halo 2 and Halo 3 kind of as one big game and split it into two, that explains why the ending is the way it is in Halo 2. i also heard, but am not too sure about this one, that Halo 3 comes out February 9. it makes sense to me that they made them at the same time, sort of like Lord of the Rings, and just released them at different times.
it also explains where all those cutscenes that you see in the commercials are, i don't remember any of them in Halo 2.
UIX Dash
Xecuter2.0L
Maxtor 120 GB HDD
P4 3.0Ghz
640mb ddr ram
120 gig hdd
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 10. December 2004 @ 13:02
|
|
Kite13
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
10. December 2004 @ 14:36 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yes Exaactly right. Im not saying they made it at the same time all im saying is that if you beat the last lvl on legendary at the end of the credits it goes Coming Febuary 9th im not saying that means halo 3 is, but they give some speculation that it might.
|
|
Quadratic
Senior Member
|
11. December 2004 @ 16:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yeah but that's just retarded to put a game out like four months after the last one. It makes no damn sense at all. I would at least wait a year and a half so people can get hyped up about it, and so that they could get all their money's worth, because people won't buy Halo 2 if Halo 3 is the same price (for those who don't have Halo 2).
|
|
fadedindi
Junior Member
|
11. December 2004 @ 16:30 |
Link to this message
|
|
Well, Halo 2 and Halo 3 were probably suppose to be one game. They probably decided to split it into to make MORE money. This is a very clever marketing idea. Halo 2 is the top selling console game on the market. They sold over 1 million copies on the day of release so why not split the game in two and make double the $$$$$$$$$. They hope people who already own Halo 2 will buy Halo 3 (and most will). Those clever bastards...
-Dave
|
|
T-spartan
Suspended permanently
|
12. December 2004 @ 14:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
hey you guys whats up Im sure you all have heard of me and trust me I have some info for all you that Id like to share. But my first theory is halo2 was definitely split in two because it was either too long or they wanted to make more money or maybe both. And the ark thats mentioned at the end will most like be in halo3 and from what Ive heard is that its found on earth I also think theres a strong chance of humans siding with some of the covenant.
|
|
T-spartan
Suspended permanently
|
12. December 2004 @ 14:46 |
Link to this message
|
|
By the way what the hell happens when you get all the skull in halo2.
|
|
hippo33
Newbie
|
3. January 2005 @ 13:28 |
Link to this message
|
|
when you get a skull you get somthing (Ex. unlimited active camo)
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Moderator
|
3. January 2005 @ 14:55 |
Link to this message
|
My killer sig came courtesy of bb "El Jefe" mayo.
The Forum Rules You Agreed To! http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/2487
"And there we saw the giants, and we were in our own sight as grasshoppers, and so we were in their sight" - Numbers 13:33 This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 4. January 2005 @ 08:28
|
