|
|
|
Exactly how does the Hauppauge -150 card work
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
16. November 2005 @ 13:29 |
Link to this message
|
Nobody I know actually uses WinTV2000 for anything. Find yourself a good PVR program, such as gbpvr.
Nero is NOT the thing to use when authoring these recordings (from a 150). Nanopeg sucks.
Use any editor you like, then author the recordings properly, in the supplied Ulead, or something good like DVDLab Pro.
Use Nero to burn only.
PQ can be adjusted many ways with a PVR-150.
Start by getting the Hauppauge Tweak tool from http://www.cask-of-amontillado.com
Read about how to tweak with it at www.shspvr.com too.
I use 6000kbps VBR for almost everything. That's a good bitrate for getting 2 hours of stuff per disk, or 3 once edited.
For copying tapes, use the bitrate calc to figure out how much you need to use, to fit the full tape onto a full disk.
Black holes are where God divided by zero...
Cheers, Jim
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
17. November 2005 @ 02:09 |
Link to this message
|
|
What are the better editing programs? I heard good things about Ulead's DVD MovieFactory.
|
|
T_Outlaw
Junior Member
|
17. November 2005 @ 06:15 |
Link to this message
|
mez... The spyware cannot get into my computer because of the programs protecting same. For your information, I do have a program installed that tells me time, date and identifies the program. In this case it was "fastclick". I am assuming it is the program which asks to allow sponsor advertising. This is strictly BS. You can stop the action with your mouse. I don't see where there is any problem with bitrate. Just go to the table and select the number of minutes involved. The higher the time the lower the bitrate. But there should be a certain point to assure clarity. I like 120 minutes as a maximum. As far as Canopus ADVC unit is concerned, there is no software. Use WinDV or DVIO. Both are simple solutions to transfer the VCR images as AVI to the hard drive. WinDV is certainly the best because you can actually monitor images being converted. In over 300 tapes transferred, I have never had a dropped frame. After the transfer to the hard drive I follow up with Canopus ProCoder then DVD-Lab. I firmly believe this is the best, easiest and quickest way to transfer from analog to DVD.
|
Member
|
17. November 2005 @ 18:31 |
Link to this message
|
Yes, that Fastclick program sucks. As of a few weeks ago, that darned thing started showing up every time I re-access AfterDawn -- and it triggers something in windows, causing a pop-up asking me to insert my Office Products 2000 disc, to get some support coding off of that disc. I have misplaced that disc, because I used it so long ago, and I have to do 6-8 cancels to get rid of all of the pop-ups. I complained to AfterDawn about it, but it was as bad as talking to Nero support -- questions go in and nothing ever comes back.
But back to the Hauppauge device, my first text came out well, well sort of well -- just using Movie Maker 2, which popped up when I made the firewire connection, I was able to read in 5 minutes of a TV channel -- but as everybody warned me, the files are huge.
With my first test, I captured a 5 minute file -- which turned out to be 75 MB, but then things got worse. First, I reduced the file to 1 minute (15 MB) and then with no other changes, I asked Movie Maker to save the file as a DV-AVI (NTSC) file. Well 10 minutes and 215 MB later, I have a DV-AVI file ready to burn with NeroVision (which as some of you know that has been following my Nero 6-to-Nero 7 thread, I can no longer burn DVD-Rs with Nero 9 -- another story).
Anyway, you gotta be kidding me aren't you: if a 1 minute 15 MB file takes 10 minutes to render and after consumes 15 times the space -- which would mean a 100 minute file would be 1.5 GB and would take 1000 (16.6 hours) and would take up 21 GB of storage. Tell me it ain't so.
By the way, who makes the WinDV or DVIO software. Does it do anything other than capture video.
Ron in Round Rock
|
|
T_Outlaw
Junior Member
|
18. November 2005 @ 05:02 |
Link to this message
|
rnsmithad.... The WinDV program is freeware. Was constructed by a Czech. Just google it for more info. Believe it's about 1,000-bytes in length. DVIO is much smaller. The program function basically is to get analog info onto the HD in the AVI format. As I stated previously, the best, simplest and easiest way to transfer analog is via the Canopus ADVC, then use Canopus Procoder, then DVD-Lab. The quality will rival your original analog tape. Also, as stated previously, Beta tape transfers will be better than VHS because it was and is a better medium. Quit worrying about HD space... if you have an extra HD, use it. The transfers and muxings are faster and cleaner. The same theory applies to DVD transfers. If Rebootjim or Minion gives you advice, take it and use it to the fullest extent possible. They both know from which they speak.... This will be easier on your father-in-law. By the way, don't forget to download the guides as referenced by Rebootjim. I take it father-in-law may not be up to speed on computers, and the written word is better than the spoken word especially for us "old" geezers.... Hope your transfers all turn out well..... best of luck... Texas Outlaw
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
18. November 2005 @ 06:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
For editing, start with something simple.
VideoReDo is probably the easiest to use.
Womble Mpeg-wizard is also good, though quirky if you're not used to it.
There are free ones, such as Cuttermaran, but it requires elementary streams, which you can get by demuxing your recordings using PVAStrumento.
These are simple editors, cutting out portions of video (commercials for example), and are all you really need at first.
Later, if you want to introduce fades and effects, you can look at more advanced (and more expensive) software.
Author in Ulead at first, until you understand the process, then move up to something like DVDLab (Pro).
Black holes are where God divided by zero...
Cheers, Jim
|
Member
|
18. November 2005 @ 07:09 |
Link to this message
|
I think I asked this question before, but never got an answer. When burning a DVD, why do programs like DVDLab or TMPGEnc Author even mention the option of burning the DVD with Nero.
Is there a difference in burning a DVD in Nero, TMPGEnc, DVDLab -- there must be -- there must be something different -- so what is it, given that the file is already in MPEG format.
Ron in Round Rock
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
18. November 2005 @ 10:00 |
Link to this message
|
T_outlaw, sorry about the comment about Fastclick. If it bounces off you really do not know. I had something like thay try to bit me 6 months ago. I went balistic and after reaming all copable parties I tightened my security. I think we all need to raise hell. It is an insult to this community that some weasel marketing firm tries to pull a stunt like that on us.
I came across this review of what "they" claim to be the top 10 video editing software.
http://video-editing-software-review.toptenreviews.com/?ttreng=1&...
rnsmithad, you need to looking at an extra HD which is at least 200 GB. You should be able to pick on up on the web for abt $100. You ought to be listening to T_outlaw and use the canopus since you already bought it. I do not always follow sound advice but if I don't and make a mess I keep my mouth shut until after I have had time to do it the right way.
By the way this is a great thread!
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
18. November 2005 @ 10:09 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
When burning a DVD, why do programs like DVDLab or TMPGEnc Author even mention the option of burning the DVD with Nero.
Nobody likes to mention anyone elses software, unless they get a kick back from it.
Quote:
Is there a difference in burning a DVD in Nero, TMPGEnc, DVDLab -- there must be -- there must be something different -- so what is it, given that the file is already in MPEG format.
Yes. There's a huge difference in how the video is authored, and what burning engine is used. DVDLab has a very basic burner, sort of an afterthought, and not recommended to burn with. Nero is still the best burning software, although their editing and authoring software is questionable.
Tmpgenc is not burning software, it's an encoder, and TDA is an authoring software.
Some programs just do one thing, and do it extremely well.
In this case, Authoring with DVDLab (Pro), and burning with Nero are the choices I use.
FWIW, I wouldn't ever use ANY of the programs mentioned in that top 10, but then again, the stuff I use cost more too, but it's dedicated, not all-in-one junk.
Black holes are where God divided by zero...
Cheers, Jim
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 18. November 2005 @ 10:11
|
Member
|
18. November 2005 @ 10:12 |
Link to this message
|
|
Mez, yes, I saw that review a while back.
I was a little worried, skeptical because of the positioning of the Pinnacle software. I gotta say that I have heard not very good things about that software. On the other hand, I haven't heard anyone say anything, good or bad, about PowerDirector.
I'm looking at the gbpvr program recommended by rebootjim. Are there other alternatives to WinTV2000 that I should look at.
Ron in Round Rock
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
18. November 2005 @ 13:50 |
Link to this message
|
|
The only other freebies are Meedio (or GotAllMedia, I forget which), and MediaPortal.
The only other ones worth considering really, are SageTV and BeyondTV, but they cost money that just isn't worth it. They have nothing that gbpvr doesn't already have, and can't do some things that it can.
Mediaportal is a huge resource hog, so unless you've got the system to run it, and that includes a higher end DX9 video card, don't bother. Beyond is difficult to set up, as it want's to transcode everything to .wmv for some unknown reason, and support for the two pay ones isn't great, except for other users in the forums. Forget support for Mediaportal. Gbpvr has superb support, directly from the author, and plenty of users in the forums.
Black holes are where God divided by zero...
Cheers, Jim
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
23. March 2006 @ 03:42 |
Link to this message
|
|
I am back trying to make a descent digital version of a cam corder tape. I did not follow advice in what to buy after I asked for it. I purchased an ATI capture card on sale that looked like it fit the bill. I saved about 60% of the cost but the product is not usable for me. Even though it does have an audio input jack it does not process the audio you have a jumper cable to pipe it to your sound card. I read enought about syncronization to not want to play with that. I would like to produce a a file that has both audio and video. I am also hoping the file will look as good as if I pipe the camcorder output to TV. What I have is not even close and there does not seem to be any way to tweek it. I will admit I threw my money away. My cam corder stores its image on a 8mm tap and the output is the old 2 audio and one composite video.
If I want to do this right the easy way for $250 or less what should I buy?
Thanks!
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
23. March 2006 @ 09:08 |
Link to this message
|
The Hauppauge PVR-150. Make sure you get the one with the composite inputs (there's a couple of different models), and you can go directly from VHS (or camcorder) to the card.
Less than $100, and it'll probably save you some time, as well as headaches, wrinkles and hair loss.
Set the capture settings (in WinTV2000) so the capture bitrate is about 5000kbps. This will get you (roughly) 2 hours per DVDR.
Once authored, you can always use DVDShrink on it, if it's just a bit large, and still retain about the best quality you can expect from an 8mm tape.
Black holes are where God divided by zero...
Cheers, Jim
|
|
crf450r
Newbie
|
23. March 2006 @ 18:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
i just ordered pvr-150 mce
the one with the 2 rca audio jacks
the problem i just discovered is it seems to require winxp mce
i dont have this mce version i have xp pro
will this card still capture without the mce version
the tuner card is of little use to me so if thats all i loose
then thats ok
but if i cant capture without mce then this is useless
i dont want to buy win xp mce just to make a capture card work
it also looks like it doesnt come with any software
anyone with info please let me know how bad it is
thanks
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
24. March 2006 @ 09:34 |
Link to this message
|
The "mce" version works under regular windows...no worries.
Download the full install disk from http://www.shspvr.com/smf/index.php?board=51.0
Unzip to your hard drive.
Put the card in the computer.
When prompted for the installation CD, browse to the unzipped file folder you just made.
Install and enjoy :D
Black holes are where God divided by zero...
Cheers, Jim
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
crf450r
Newbie
|
24. March 2006 @ 16:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
thanks thats what i wanted to hear
this has got to be the best web site
it will be here in a few days ill be back to let you know
how it went
and then prob will have more questions
|
|
