|
|
PSP vs PSP Slim - Thread to discuss your opinions
|
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
27. September 2007 @ 11:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
Think something got lost in translation...
Does anorexia induce constipation?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Ive become so paranoid, that Im paranoid about my paranoia....
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 27. September 2007 @ 11:28
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
yoyo23
Member
|
27. September 2007 @ 12:03 |
Link to this message
|
|
i know that proves that there is no differnce between the two go check it out your self
|
Senior Member
|
27. September 2007 @ 12:16 |
Link to this message
|
I think you're confused... The slim and the fat can't be exactly the same dimensions. The slim is really:
6.65353 in x 2.795269 in x .748 in. and not
6.7 in (W) x .9 in (H) x 2.9 in (D)
Btw, the height and depth are switched in your data set.
[EDIT: After thinking it through, I can see it from your data set's perspective, as if the PSP is on it's back. In which case, my data is flipped and not yours.]
The slim is 0.418 lbs, not .62 lbs.
The slim also has a video output, not mentioned in either of your data sets.
Even though the sizes aren't much different, they are different. Wherever you got your info is not a reliable source.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 27. September 2007 @ 12:17
|
|
yoyo23
Member
|
27. September 2007 @ 18:17 |
Link to this message
|
|
i jest copied what i saw go to ebgames and you will see the same thing
|
|
psomiadis
Newbie
|
23. January 2008 @ 20:50 |
Link to this message
|
Sorry to drag up an old thread but most of you guys are missing the point...
First of all the specs of FAT and SLIM PSP
(only changed info included):
FAT PSP
=======
* Product Name: PlayStation Portable (PSP)
* Dimensions: Approx. 170 mm (L) x 74 mm (W) x 23 mm (D)
* Weight: Approx. 260 g (including battery)
* Main Memory: 32MB
* Embedded DRAM: 4MB
* Display: 4.3 inch, 16:9 widescreen TFT LCD, 480 x 272 pixel (16.77 million colors), Max. 200 cd/m2
(with 4 brightness levels)
* Main Input/Output: IEEE 802.11b (Wi-Fi), USB 2.0 (Target), Memory Stick? PRO Duo, IrDA, IR Remote (SIRCS)
* Disc Drive: UMD Drive (Playback only)
* Main Connectors: DC OUT 5V, Terminals for charging built-in battery, Headphone/Microphone/Control connector
PSP Slim
========
* Product Name: PlayStation Portable - Slim and Lite(PSP Slim)
* Dimensions: Approx. 169.4 mm (L) x 71.4 mm (W) x 18.6 mm (D)
* Weight: Approx. 189 g (including battery)
* Main Memory: 64MB
* Embedded DRAM: 8MB
* Display: 4.3 inch, 16:9 widescreen TFT LCD, 480 x 272 pixel (16.77 million colors), Max. 200 cd/m2
(with 5 brightness levels - 5th is hidden)
* Main Input/Output: IEEE 802.11b (Wi-Fi), USB 2.0 with charge mode(Target), Memory Stick? PRO Duo
* Disc Drive: UMD Drive (Playback only)
* Main Connectors: DC OUT 5V, Terminals for charging built-in battery, Headphone/Microphone/Control Connector/AV Out
To see the size difference easily look HERE:
http://reviews.cnet.com/sony-psp/
To see the new headphones/remote (not like we care about this useless "extra" gizmo) go HERE:
http://www.renchi.com/renchi/PSP_PSP_Sli...te_Official.htm
I owned BOTH the FAT and SLIM from release day imported from Japan - I can tell you guys that anyone with FAT PSP will be missing out because...
1) Twice the Flash RAM so many of the new firmware features are SLIM only. (like the upcoming SKYPE support)
http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=178720
2) Twice the internal RAM, so homebrew emulators and games have more RAM to play with.
Yes, there are down points...
1) No Infra-red, but who cares - no one used it anyhow!
2) No 1.5 homebrew, but most homebrew is 3.XX compatible now in any case...
The slim feels so much lighter it's like when NIKE added air-soles!
Not like any of this matters, as CFW hackers have already theorised that there will be a THIRD PSP model in the future...maybe...
http://www.pspfanboy.com/2007/12/19/hack...-psp-is-coming/
-=3Dfx still rox!=-
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
23. January 2008 @ 21:03 |
Link to this message
|
|
Old Thread...how about ancient thread.. This thread probly has seen dinosaurs before but anyways you're not supposed to post if nobody has written for 3 months lol.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
psomiadis
Newbie
|
23. January 2008 @ 22:38 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ah, okay - it's an unwritten (or maybe written, dunno?) posting rule.
Just some random Googling brought me here and I was bored...
-=3Dfx still rox!=-
|
