|
Burning speed
|
|
|
geezer5
Junior Member
|
2. September 2005 @ 17:53 |
Link to this message
|
|
Using a 48x burner, is there any optimum speed to burn music cdr's?
I'm using these for archiving.
Thanks!
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
ddp
Moderator
|
3. September 2005 @ 08:50 |
Link to this message
|
|
the slower the better upto a point. i usually do about 16x for data as older rom drives has a problem reading high speed burnt cd's.
|
|
killerc
Suspended permanently
|
3. September 2005 @ 18:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
for cds i always do 4x i realiize the sound quality gets better
|
AfterDawn Addict
6 product reviews
|
3. September 2005 @ 21:31 |
Link to this message
|
|
@geezer5
Im with Killerc the slower the better and 4x speed i would say is the optimum speed cause u will have the least skips and error tracks
4x and what CDR's are u using sometimes media can b an issue as is when it comes to DVD's
Edited by DVDBack23
"the mediocre teacher tells. the good teacher explains. the superior teacher demonstrates. the great teacher inspires."- William Aruthur Ward
Website: http://www.ampleblaze.com |
|
aabbccdd
Suspended permanently
|
4. September 2005 @ 01:29 |
Link to this message
|
|
i think 4X is to slow for cdr's
i burn at 16X with great success
|
AfterDawn Addict
6 product reviews
|
4. September 2005 @ 02:13 |
Link to this message
|
|
@aabbccdd
Eventually the laser head will not do it properly and u will have missed or quiet tracks
slower is better take it from expereince...
Edited by DVDBack23
"the mediocre teacher tells. the good teacher explains. the superior teacher demonstrates. the great teacher inspires."- William Aruthur Ward
Website: http://www.ampleblaze.com |
|
aabbccdd
Suspended permanently
|
4. September 2005 @ 02:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
may depend on your burner also my Plextor is really a good burner
|
AfterDawn Addict
6 product reviews
|
4. September 2005 @ 04:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
well as i always say whatever works...
If it works stick with it...
Edited by DVDBack23
"the mediocre teacher tells. the good teacher explains. the superior teacher demonstrates. the great teacher inspires."- William Aruthur Ward
Website: http://www.ampleblaze.com |
|
geezer5
Junior Member
|
4. September 2005 @ 07:44 |
Link to this message
|
|
Guess there's no universal rule. you hear a lot about slower-is-better, but this from a media faq (from another board):
"Very slow burn speeds are not good when using high speed media in a high speed drive. It's also true that you can almost always improve the quality of your burn by lowering the burn speed a "little bit". For example, my 52x drive can produce very acceptable quality discs at 48x on the right media, but quality improves even more if I burn at 40x. I see very little, if any, improvement in quality by lowering the burn speed to 32x, and decreasing quality below 24x. With older, low-speed rated media you might see better quality at very slow burn speeds, but again the best thing is to try it and test it."
__________________
|
|
ddp
Moderator
|
4. September 2005 @ 09:09 |
Link to this message
|
|
if playing on your equipment than try at different speeds to see if any difference or difficulties at various burn speeds.
|
|
killerc
Suspended permanently
|
4. September 2005 @ 10:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
@ ddp if you burn at a highspeed would the song get a little chopy and the louder you play the music, the worst it gets as for burning at 4x the louder you got the sound quality doesnt get so bad ?
|
|
ddp
Moderator
|
4. September 2005 @ 10:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
depends on the burner, the player & media. a friend of mine burns music cds usually about 24x & that is with 52x burner.
|
|
killerc
Suspended permanently
|
4. September 2005 @ 10:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
man i never thaught burner good quality would be so complicated lol
|
|
aabbccdd
Suspended permanently
|
4. September 2005 @ 11:11 |
Link to this message
|
|
i think geezer5 hit it on the head .theres no need to drop 52X media(being that its good blank media) with a good burner (Plextor in my case) below half its rated speed. ive burned 100s if not 1000s of cds and never have a sound quality issue burning at a higher speed . so burning below 32X or 16X is really a waste of time.The most important thing is have good blank media and a good system to backup your cds
|
|
killerc
Suspended permanently
|
4. September 2005 @ 13:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
I use kodec is than n e good aabbccdd
|
|
aabbccdd
Suspended permanently
|
4. September 2005 @ 14:18 |
Link to this message
|
|
its really not that good of media
use Maxell,TDK or Sony and of course Taiyo Yuden, theses are much better
|
|
killerc
Suspended permanently
|
4. September 2005 @ 14:22 |
Link to this message
|
ok next time i buy cds ill change the quality
Quote:
use Maxell,TDK or Sony and of course Taiyo Yuden, theses are much better
what do you reccomend i use out of these?
|
|
aabbccdd
Suspended permanently
|
4. September 2005 @ 14:44 |
Link to this message
|
|
i would go with the Maxell
there easy to find at your local Wal-Mart
and also Office Depot runs them on sale alot 100 packs are usally priced from 17 dollars to 20 dollars which is a great deal
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 4. September 2005 @ 15:00
|
|
killerc
Suspended permanently
|
4. September 2005 @ 15:57 |
Link to this message
|
|
ya ill go with maxell then , i bought the 50 pk of kodec cds for 25 , aabbccdd -do u live in the states
|
|
aabbccdd
Suspended permanently
|
4. September 2005 @ 16:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
yes "Indianapolis" area
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
killerc
Suspended permanently
|
4. September 2005 @ 17:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
lol i live in toronto, canada so a 100 pack would me 34-40$ thats still good
|
