|
suggest me best please
|
|
|
rahulsood
Newbie
|
28. January 2006 @ 12:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
here i want to ask you people, how i can burn 8 gb of dvd in 4.7 gb actualy what happen i bought series of serial and its in 8 dvd's and now i want a copy off all and i dont know how but its full of 8gb.I have only 4.7 gb media because 9 gb media is very expensive in india and i bought cheaper dvd in original how its possible i dont know. If i go with dvd shrinker it reduce the quality and even skip in dvd player too , please help me how this is possible.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
andmerr
Suspended permanently
|
28. January 2006 @ 12:50 |
Link to this message
|
try using something that gives you good compression like CloneDVD version2 + slysofts Anydvd
|
Senior Member
|
28. January 2006 @ 12:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
NO matter what software you use you are going to hav teh quality reduced. YOu are talking about compression, almost a 2:1 ratio. Honestly, what were you expecting. Skipping it usually due to media issues. I've never had one of my backups skip and I use shrink all the time. You can also reauthor.
|
|
andmerr
Suspended permanently
|
28. January 2006 @ 12:57 |
Link to this message
|
|
what media and burning speed are you using?
|
|
andmerr
Suspended permanently
|
28. January 2006 @ 12:57 |
Link to this message
|
|
maybe i should of said better quality in compression
|
Senior Member
|
28. January 2006 @ 12:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
andmerr, could you explain taht to me? I've never used Clone, is it better quality or what?
|
|
andmerr
Suspended permanently
|
28. January 2006 @ 13:10 |
Link to this message
|
do you remember 321 platinum version, well it gave a superb compressed look to the dvd that was copied.Quality was very good, well CloneDVD does the same even though you are using compression to get a dvd 9 onto a dvd 5
|
Senior Member
|
28. January 2006 @ 15:15 |
Link to this message
|
|
So a 60% compressed DVD done w/ Clone is better than a 60% DVD done w/ Shrink. But is a 50% Clone DVD better than a 60% Srhink? And what was the compression that it started looking not so good? 40%?
|
|
andmerr
Suspended permanently
|
28. January 2006 @ 15:40 |
Link to this message
|
each project is different and has to be judged differently but i do think that CloneDVD ver2 does do a better job than shrink
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
28. January 2006 @ 16:51 |
Link to this message
|
Where does Recode fit into this equation...being an improved version of DVD Shrink?
|
|
andmerr
Suspended permanently
|
28. January 2006 @ 18:58 |
Link to this message
|
|
apart from it being easier to use with encoded avi's it doesnt.I like recode but it really isnt superior to clone when your talking about quality but it is when your talking about application diversity.....
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
29. January 2006 @ 16:56 |
Link to this message
|
|
So clone quality is superior, interesting. I may have to look into it.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
andmerr
Suspended permanently
|
29. January 2006 @ 16:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
i have always found it to be so, but now i just use recode for functionality, i really like the merge function.........
|
