User User name Password  
   
Monday 6.1.2025 / 06:52
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > digital video > digital camcorders > looking for good quality camcorder
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
Looking for good quality Camcorder
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
RXV2300
Member
_
11. May 2007 @ 07:32 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Hello I'm from Canada, looking to purchase good quality camcorder my budget is maximum CAD $700.00
Not sure if I should get with internal HD, or mini dvd
How are the ones with mini tapes? Is video quality as good as mini dvd or hdd.
Forget about high definition as they start at $900.00 & over.
I am not a professional & will be using this to video family get togethers, parties, kids at home & some sporting events.
I think Sony is probably the most reliable brand & that's the brand I believe I'll be looking at but not sure which models I should look at. Don't want something with lots if bells & whistles which I'll never use or would never figure out what they are used for at the same token I don't want something that will look like it's worth $50.00
Let me know what I should be looking for & thank you.
Advertisement
_
__
whassup
Member
_
11. May 2007 @ 11:17 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Lots of models to choose from. I can't recommend a single model since that's so subjective so I'll explain the pros and cons

DVD cams
Pro: Very convenient if you don't want to fool around with capturing/edit/authoring software and DVD burners.
Con: Not much manual control over process and mini-DVD's can get expensive.

HD cams
Pro: Very convenient in that you don't need multiple tapes. Probably the format of the future.
Con: You need to transfer to computer to capture, etc.

mini DV
Pro: Has the most lossless codec which means has the highest "quality".
Con: You need to change tapes and it's a dying format.

Get a camcorder that has the highest recording pixels. You need to check the specs. The higher the recording pixels, the better your picture will be.

Given your budget, most HDD cams are out. Personally, I'd choose a good mini-DV camera since I don't mind the whole transferring process. If you have no idea about making DVD's on your computer and don't necessarily care, then the DVD cams may be your best bet.
lionkid7
Newbie
_
11. May 2007 @ 12:43 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Quote:
You need to transfer to computer to capture, etc.
Can't you just transfer the recorded file just as a common file transfer?

Never say never
whassup
Member
_
11. May 2007 @ 13:43 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Transfer can be meant as capture or file transfer. I'm not too sure about the HDD cams since I haven't tried one yet.

You'll still need to render, edit, re-encode, etc.

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 11. May 2007 @ 13:45

RXV2300
Member
_
12. May 2007 @ 09:12 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by whassup:
Lots of models to choose from. I can't recommend a single model since that's so subjective so I'll explain the pros and cons

DVD cams
Pro: Very convenient if you don't want to fool around with capturing/edit/authoring software and DVD burners.
Con: Not much manual control over process and mini-DVD's can get expensive.

HD cams
Pro: Very convenient in that you don't need multiple tapes. Probably the format of the future.
Con: You need to transfer to computer to capture, etc.

mini DV
Pro: Has the most lossless codec which means has the highest "quality".
Con: You need to change tapes and it's a dying format.

Get a camcorder that has the highest recording pixels. You need to check the specs. The higher the recording pixels, the better your picture will be.

Given your budget, most HDD cams are out. Personally, I'd choose a good mini-DV camera since I don't mind the whole transferring process. If you have no idea about making DVD's on your computer and don't necessarily care, then the DVD cams may be your best bet.
RXV2300
Member
_
12. May 2007 @ 09:14 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I've looked at specs of few models but I see nothing mentioned of
"recording pixels". Is there anything special I should be looking for to know this?
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
whassup
Member
_
16. May 2007 @ 14:21 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Here's an example of recording pixels, taken from the Sonystyle website for DCR-HC48:

Number of Pixels (maximum, still image recording):
Gross Pixels: Approx 1070K
Effective Pixels of Moving Pictures in 16:9: Approx. 670K
Effective Pixels of Moving Pictures in 4:3: Approx. 690K
Effective Pixels of Still Images in 16:9: Approx. 750K
Effective Pixels of Still Images in 4:3: Approx. 1000K

You want to look at effective pixels and not gross.
afterdawn.com > forums > digital video > digital camcorders > looking for good quality camcorder
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork