The Sig Thread - Get one now!
|
|
Senior Member
|
20. December 2006 @ 11:04 |
Link to this message
|
@dsgtrain,
Thats great for a first attempt! :-)
Keep practising and you'll get a lot better in no time.
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
20. December 2006 @ 11:11 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by rav009: @dsgtrain,
Thats great for a first attempt! :-)
Keep practising and you'll get a lot better in no time.
Agreed. Keep at it! :)
|
Member
1 product review
|
20. December 2006 @ 11:22 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Me:
Back on topic (well..) I'm thinking of making a new sig with a kinda tribal design, but I'll see and put one up in a week or so :-)
Well, what Ripper says, Ripper does. New Xmassy sig up. It's not very good, but I don't care, cos I made it in about 1 minute whilst drinking coffee with one hand and doing PS with the other! Lol, Anyhow, tribal sig for the new year I think! :-)
Nice sig. I took mine from some random sig website so its not very good. May make one for christmas day and the new year.
Ohh and thanks for the support!! You might catch me in here a bit more often.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20. December 2006 @ 11:25
|
Member
|
20. December 2006 @ 12:06 |
Link to this message
|
@deadrain
if you can get the pic off the front cover that would be cool but if not then resize that one for me mkay
|
Senior Member
|
20. December 2006 @ 12:09 |
Link to this message
|
i can get the front cover!
so you want this pic? where does your name go?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20. December 2006 @ 12:13
|
Member
|
20. December 2006 @ 12:15 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by DeadRain: i can get the front cover!
so you want this pic? where does your name go?
put it where it has the title but make it small enough for specs
but if not then i will use the other one
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20. December 2006 @ 12:16
|
Senior Member
|
20. December 2006 @ 12:19 |
Link to this message
|
sorry, i dont think i can do that T.T
|
Member
|
20. December 2006 @ 12:22 |
Link to this message
|
then i will just use the other one then thx tho
|
Member
|
20. December 2006 @ 12:26 |
Link to this message
|
@ all mods
is my sig small enuogh for specs?
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
20. December 2006 @ 12:32 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by 2f4st4u: @ all mods
is my sig small enuogh for specs?
Yes it is.
|
Member
|
20. December 2006 @ 12:37 |
Link to this message
|
do you know how to make it smaller for me?
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
20. December 2006 @ 12:39 |
Link to this message
|
I said "yes it is" as in it is fine it complies with sig rules. So you dont need to make it nay smaller....
|
Member
|
20. December 2006 @ 12:40 |
Link to this message
|
so its fine?
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
20. December 2006 @ 12:40 |
Link to this message
|
Yes.
|
Member
|
20. December 2006 @ 12:42 |
Link to this message
|
cool 'cause i like this one :)
it is sick, in a good way though
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 20. December 2006 @ 20:51
|
Member
|
21. December 2006 @ 00:44 |
Link to this message
|
wheres your sig at?
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. December 2006 @ 00:46 |
Link to this message
|
Yeah face you used to have a decent sig up made by Jamal. Where'd it go?
Lol
|
Member
|
21. December 2006 @ 00:49 |
Link to this message
|
@ripper
your sig is pretty sweet
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. December 2006 @ 00:51 |
Link to this message
|
Meh, it's alright.
Thanks, Btw. :-)
|
Member
|
21. December 2006 @ 00:53 |
Link to this message
|
its full of cheer yayay
|
Staff Member
4 product reviews
|
21. December 2006 @ 07:44 |
Link to this message
|
new sig guys, what do u think?
btw, movie was awesome, go OUT and see it ;)
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. December 2006 @ 07:49 |
Link to this message
|
Looks good, text is a bit bland/hard to see. All the same, good work!
But the film... A 60 0dd year old Rocky? I think I'll pass thanks ;-)
:-)
|
Junior Member
|
21. December 2006 @ 08:13 |
Link to this message
|
|
Staff Member
4 product reviews
|
21. December 2006 @ 08:41 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Ripper: Looks good, text is a bit bland/hard to see. All the same, good work!
But the film... A 60 0dd year old Rocky? I think I'll pass thanks ;-)
:-)
text is bad cause this was a name-less sig, but i didnt want people stealing it and putting their names on it, so i put some bland text ;)
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
21. December 2006 @ 09:21 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by Ripper: Looks good, text is a bit bland/hard to see. All the same, good work!
But the film... A 60 0dd year old Rocky? I think I'll pass thanks ;-)
:-)
text is bad cause this was a name-less sig, but i didnt want people stealing it and putting their names on it, so i put some bland text ;)
Yeah, sigs look better nameless most of the time, but then your stuff gets ripped. BTW, I'm looking forward to seeing that film too, all the other Rockys were great.
|