|
|
|
Hurt Locker producer files suit against 5000 alleged pirates
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 29 May, 2010
In early May we reported that "Hurt Locker" producer Voltage Pictures was preparing to sue thousands of alleged pirates for downloading the film online.
This week, that suit has come to fruition, with Voltage suing 5000 unidentified pirates accused of downloading the 2009 Best Picture.
Says the suit: "A Defendant's distribution of even one unlawful copy of a motion picture can result ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. June 2010 @ 09:10 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Daniel_1:
I dont really give a care if you believe me or not, I know my facts are rock solid and so would you if you would take less time saying they are not true and more time actually doing what seems alien to you and that is looking at the links. And as for the sats stationary orbit, I ALREADY DID prove it and you would know that if you bothered to look at the link.
Dan you have bats in your belfry! The only agreement your statements have with your last 'proof' is that their are spy satellites, which was never in question. Spy satellites are 600-1,200 miles out! You stated they were 200 miles out. You have been trying to pawn your self off as an expert with 'facts' that defy science so greatly they are in insult to anyone who knows even a tiny bit about it. Instead of the camera lenses being a 1/3 mile in diameter they would need to be over a mile in diameter. Oh YES I believe you! Next you might be claiming the moon was built by the US and that is how they see dimples on a golf ball!
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
|
Daniel_1
Suspended permanently
|
10. June 2010 @ 09:23 |
Link to this message
|
|
I stand by what I said. If you don't wish to check out the links and phone numbers I gave you, then it is pretty hypocritical for you to insist they are incorrect
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
10. June 2010 @ 10:11 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Daniel_1:
I stand by what I said. If you don't wish to check out the links and phone numbers I gave you, then it is pretty hypocritical for you to insist they are incorrect
You are pissing me off Dan! No one stated your links had incorrect information just you have incorrect information. Your one link was not there but your last link was there and I did read it.
This the complete section on Spy Satellites cut and pasted from your link. It doesn't support ANYTHING you stated. Point out WHERE the proofs are for the ridiculous thing you stated. If you can't then you proved our point not yours!
Spy Satellites
Spysats and military communications satellites dominate space from 600 to 1,200 miles altitude. The spysats gather electronic intelligence (ELINT), signal intelligence (SIGINT) and radar intelligence (RADINT). Hamsats also operate there.
Science research satellites do much of their work at altitudes between 3,000 and 6,000 miles above Earth. Their findings are radioed to Earth as telemetry data.
From 6,000 to 12,000 miles altitude, navigation satellites operate. Best known are the U.S. global-positioning system (GPS) and Russia's equivalent GLONASS satellites.
As described above, the so-called Clarke Belt is the region of space 22,300 miles above Earth where satellites seem stationary above the rotating Earth. Best known occupants of the Clarke Belt are the many domestic and international TV broadcast, weather reporting and communications satellites.
|
|
Daniel_1
Suspended permanently
|
10. June 2010 @ 10:31 |
Link to this message
|
Again since you just dont seem to get it, I stand by what I posted as it is all validated. No skin off my nose if you refuse to check as that says quite a lot about your posts to me on this subject...that you just cannot be bothered with allowing truth and facts to get in the way of your beliefs. And isnt it so very telling about you and your claims that according to Airman Scheffer (the person manning the phones at the USAF in the Pentagon) that no one has bothered to call them and ask about the Aurora? Or about the STATIONARY orbits of 99.9% of all sats? I mean get real Mez, the sats are only so damn big and to make them able to change directions on a moments whim would require them to have not only an engine, but a source of fuel as well. Granted they have solar panels but these are for the electricity for the WORKINGS of the sat, not some mythical engine. But hey...feel free to go right on making a fool of yourself claiming what I said was false and yet not bothering to check. Says more about your posts then anything I could ever say.
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
11. June 2010 @ 08:50 |
Link to this message
|
|
Dan you haven't answered any of the pointed questions or maybe I am just dense. Cut and paste the post that proves your point and bold the statement that validates your point. That would win me over for sure then I would congratulate you for proving your point and teaching me something. Remember, you said spy satellites could resolve dimples on a golf ball. That is physically impossible unless the lens was more than a quarter of a mile in diameter. I did post the formula for calculating the minimum lens size to resolve an image of a certain size listed in Wikipedia. The size would be 180 divided by the radius (600 miles converted to millimeters). That is derived from half the degrees of a circle divided by half the circumference of a circle with a radius of 600 miles. That is simple geometry learned in elementary school in most countries of the world. That came out to about 1/10 billionth of a degree. I would even go for reading a license plate. Just posting proof that spy satellites exist doesn't prove your point. No one argued that spy satellites exist. No one is arguing that the Aurora exists or that it is very fast and stealthy. That is logical progression from the Blackbird. Now if you claimed something as foolish as "resolving dimples on a golf ball from 600 miles in space" like the Aurora goes 10 times the speed of light I would call you on that as well but you didn't.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 11. June 2010 @ 08:59
|
|
Daniel_1
Suspended permanently
|
11. June 2010 @ 10:46 |
Link to this message
|
|
Mez, I have answered ALL the questions that were put to me with links AND with contacts and as I said before, you have refused to check. I even gave you the benefit of the doubt thinking that maybe you had something going on and could not check the Pentagon about the Sats and the Aurora even though I freely gave you the number to check so you would not have to look it up. And as of 9am this morning.. you still have not bothered to check and yet you sit there and accuse me of not telling the truth when you cannot be bothered to check the source I gave??!!
Sorry Mez, you could have settled this with a simple call, yet you choose not to and insist that I am not telling the truth based on YOUR say so instead of the experts. With that simple act alone you have just polluted anything more you have to say as you just will not let the facts get in the way of your view on things.
I stand fully behind my posts as they are valid and factual. Too bad you cannot say the same thing
|
|
xtago
Senior Member
|
11. June 2010 @ 19:15 |
Link to this message
|
if your not in the army anymore then why are you fussed about the clearance?
You can't use it it means nothing for those who have left the forces and you can't go onto a base and look at the books anyway once you have left.
I have friends in the forces as well and to look at any of the special stuff shall we say you get locked away in a safe for a set amount of time you say you want to be in there for.
So I don't know why your whinging about all this.
Then all the sat and US army having lasers and the wing suit have all been in popualr mechanics mag this year in fact the wing suit was last month or so, so I reckon your clearance lets you read that at most.
Then at the end of the day what does any of this usless info got to do with this movie studio sueing all these people to which the first 700 IPs have been leaked and lawyers all over the US are going to those people asking them if they want to fight it already.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 11. June 2010 @ 19:54
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
12. June 2010 @ 06:44 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Daniel_1:
Sorry Mez, you could have settled this with a simple call, yet you choose not to and insist that I am not telling the truth based on YOUR say so instead of the experts. With that simple act alone you have just polluted anything more you have to say as you just will not let the facts get in the way of your view on things.
I stand fully behind my posts as they are valid and factual. Too bad you cannot say the same thing
I guess that is that. You are sure jerking me around! Well, I guess that is what I get for trying to reason with a fruit loop like you. I have been very easy on you because you have kept this above board. We are all ass-holes keeping this thread going so long. If I see you on AD doing this same thing, making asinine statements then just playing monkey-shine, I will see if I can show you my other side. You should be easy to 'vaporize' (flame so hard/hot you disappear from AD). I will not waist muy time on a dead topic. I will what for a fresh one.
|
|
xtago
Senior Member
|
12. June 2010 @ 09:07 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Mez:
Fire Fox does not like that site. I think it had a security addon. I still could not find that page. Was it under journals?
Unanswered questions; why do we still have spy planes if we can see dimples on golf balls from satellites? Spy planes are a real bummer. I knew someone second hand that flew Blackbirds. I told my friend when he told me is brother flew Blackbirds 'it must be wonderful to fly the fastest plane on earth'. He told me round trip is over 12 hrs. The pilots have to do lots of weird stuff including diapers to function and to sit in a cockpit for that long. They use an insane amount of fuel, manned spy flights are a liability. The 'good satellite' pictures were always from small unmanned ultra-light gliders that were probably dropped by spy planes. They took pictures from only a few miles up. The wings were made from clear plastic like cellophane and I guess they self destructed or got picked up by spy planes. Very little has ever been released about these. These probably can get license plates.
I have done a little astronomy myself. Check the formula for Angular resolution. That tells you how big a lens has to be to resolve an angle. The angel of 1 mm arc at 200 miles radius is VERY small. The lens needed to resolve dimples of a golf ball at 200 miles is far bigger than a foot ball stadium if the glass was perfect and there was no atmosphere. I guess they put those into space with their warp drive flying saucers! The degrees of the arc is 180/2*10^10 you can plug that into your equation found @ Angular resolution formula
Use the formula for a single telescope since the cameras only have one lens. There example in the case of yellow light with a wavelength of 580 nm, for a resolution of 0.1 arc second, we need D = 1.2 m. Our average light is yellow. I doubt that spy satellite lenses are much more than a meter due to the weight. You are off by many,many 0s.
You'd have spy planes because they can circle a target for hours on end always tracking a target.
A sat in the sky while the new spy sats have really good cameras and the spy sat photos you see today are really crap compared to the new ones, they still have to orbit the planet.
which means they won't see the target for 30 seconds or so till they come around by that time the target could be gone, and can't be tracked.
The India and Pakistan made nukes while hiding them from the US spy sats they worked out where they'd be and how long they'd have to move and do stuff so when the did a test launch the USA army had no idea what was going on till India said it was a nuke test.
So spy planes are a valid thing to have in use today, spy sats are mainly used to do wide area re-con.
say the US wants to keep tabs on the whole of North Korea well you can do that with sats easy for the whole country in 1 sweep and simply use computers to mark out areas which have changed from the last sweep.
where as if you used a plane it could get shot down there's are missiles which can shoot down black-hawks so they made them extremely fast so by the time the missile travelled 80,000klms into the sky it'd be long gone.
the fastest missiles travel around Mach 3 which is around 3,677klms per second so your still looking at a few mins before it got to 80,000klms.
|
|
Daniel_1
Suspended permanently
|
12. June 2010 @ 10:35 |
Link to this message
|
I have been jerking no one around Mez so stop with the crock tears. I gave you links and you refused to check them claiming that it was a bad cookie. I have been with computers since the fastest connection was a 4.baud and all connections were long distance even if they were next door, and not once have I heard nor seen one person other then you blame not being able to connect to a site on a bad cookie. A bad link yes, a bad cookie...never happened. I gave you the name and phone number of the airman in the USAF Pentagon offices to talk to about the spy plane Aurora and the sat's stationary orbits...and again you have not bothered to contact him yet you claim I am not telling the truth. Real nice to be able to have that ability as to judge a person without checking their sources. I told you Atmospheric conditions are not a term used in telescopes as you and another claimed, the proper term is "Light Pollution" and that is even in the dictionary! Yet you and your sycophant said I was wrong on that as well And if this is such a bloody issue, then pray tell how do the Astronauts and the Sat's give back such crystal clear pics, you can see this by using google for crying out loud.
Here, if you are that ignorant...is a link that shows a sat showing you an up close and personal look at home plate on a baseball field from 200 miles up!
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iREy1...nK0s2gD931EIO80
Here is a link to a story where they can identify you from 200 miles up JUST BY YOUR SHADOW AND GAIT!! http://www.spacelove.org/ as well as clearly telling you that the KNOWN Military spy sats can go clear down to 10 CM! And you have no idea what the classified spy sats can do, but as I said with my Cosmic Top Secret security Clearance from the Military...I DO!!! And the simple Google Sat that you are using now for maps and streets was leased to them by the NSA and was high tech for the NSA, back in the 1970's!
My GOD Mez, even people in Shelbyville Tenn know more then you do! http://www.t-g.com/blogs/thomwilliamson/entry/15995/desc
Mez, You REALLY should stop while people think your ignorant then continue on and remove all doubt as you are getting thumped very badly on this issue.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. June 2010 @ 10:37
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
12. June 2010 @ 16:15 |
Link to this message
|
|
Dan, you are in your own little pathetic world. Pathetic because you have to make up tall tails just to try to get some attention. You remind me of my boyhood neighbor. Once he claimed to have caught a whale because we had gone on a great fishing trip and caught lots of big fish. When he graduated college he couldn't hold a job despite his father being one of the most powerful corporate lawyers in the US. At one time he was on 5 different boards of trustees. Not small ones but huge corporations such as Amtrak and the PNC Bank. Finally, his dad had the PNC public relations hire him. His boss called him (Kenny) in and told that he (Kenny) had put him, the boss, in a very difficult position. Almost his entire staff had come to him to complain the Kenny was such an asshole the kid had to be fired. He did not want to get in trouble with his father. He begged Kenny not to be such an asshole for just one week so that is staff wouldn't keep insisting that you must be fired and he would keep him on. Kenny was fired the next week. You see Kenny was a power ass-hole. He couldn't help himself even for a week. He had delusions that what he was saying was smart instead of repulsively stupid. The neighbors all knew Kenny was a stupid and the most gullible person we knew. His ego was so pathetic, he had say stupid things all the time to make him feel smart. He like you was so stupid he didn't know what he was saying was stupid. Dan how come there is only you defending your self and more than me on your case. Yes, we must all be BOZOs. You are the only smart one.
Dan you are probably pretty much like Kenny. Stupid but with lots of imagination. A regular power-ass-hole. You can't argue with smart persons because you are too stupid. You make up things only a moron would believe. Then defend your arguments saying you explained everything but explained nothing and do not intend to because you can't. It is like arguing with a 4 yr old. I bet you even think you are smart, just like Kenny!
I must be almost as foolish as you to be still be replying to your nonsense. I will need to wise up! You are a huge waste of time!
|
Staff Member
4 product reviews
|
12. June 2010 @ 17:21 |
Link to this message
|
|
Reading through the comments I literally forgot what my original article was about lol
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
12. June 2010 @ 23:36 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by DVDBack23:
Reading through the comments I literally forgot what my original article was about lol
no kidding
Powered By
 |
Newbie
|
13. June 2010 @ 02:52 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by DXR88:
Originally posted by DVDBack23:
Reading through the comments I literally forgot what my original article was about lol
no kidding
Precisely my sentiments, DXR88.
|
|
Daniel_1
Suspended permanently
|
13. June 2010 @ 10:36 |
Link to this message
|
|
I stand by my last post. Too bad you cannot stand by any of yours.
|
Senior Member
|
14. June 2010 @ 02:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
its not about winning an argument.its about discussing your views and opinions on this topic.
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|
|
Daniel_1
Suspended permanently
|
14. June 2010 @ 08:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
xboxdvl2, sorry. when someone refuses to check sources and then calls them myths or lies; then it IS about winning the argument. when you refuse to check the sources and then have the audacity to claim they are not factual, that alone shows much about the person that said it and when you get sycophants chiming in, you MUST defend yourself to the point of winning the argument. case closed. As such I stand by my validated sources.
|
Senior Member
|
16. June 2010 @ 17:56 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Daniel_1:
Jemborg, I am not making a thing up and you should stop showing your ignorance. Contact the USAF and see if the Blackbird is being decommissioned or not and they will tell you it is. Contact the US Pentagon and ask them about the Aurora fighter plane and they will confirm that it does in fact exist and does exactly what I said it does. Then go back to the Sat command of the USAF or even NASA in florida and ask them if these spy sats are in a stationary orbit and they will confirm they are.
You know jemborg, it seems that every time you open your mouth your ignorance shows through. Maybe you need to stop flappin your gums and check the facts once in a while, but since you dont seem to know how, here is a site that will teach you how much you do NOT know http://www.spacetoday.org/Satellites/SatBytes/SatOrbits.html
I have hear of intentional ignorance jemborg, and now when I look it up I see a picture of you. Just goes to show that since you made up your answers and got them debunked, what else are you wrong on? Quite probably everything.
Man, you are astonishingly so full of it and so rude to boot. Ok, the gloves are off.
I never said the Aurora did not exist, or even mention the friggen Blackbird. Goose.
I never said that satellites could not exist in a stationary orbit. Jerkwad.
You wrote:Originally posted by Dandickhead:
Sats are set in a stationary orbit and cannot be moved.
I wrote:Originally posted by me:
Satellite maneuvering (manoeuvering in "British" English!) is the use of (usually) on-board thrusters to move the satellite around in its orbit. These manoeuvres may be small-scale, such as to keep a geostationary satellite in its "fixed" point in the sky (usually called station-keeping) or may be large-scale, involving a major change in the orbital position, altitude, inclination, etc. (Like for a spy-sat idiot!)
From- http://en.allexperts.com/q/Satellite-Com...Maneuvering.htm
Haven't you ever watched a doco on spy-satellites? Patently not.
No wonder you never quote me/anyone. No, you just use your pissweak rhetoric to put words in people's mouths. I'm very clear when I write... review it. Whereas you, by contrast, offer up a rambling pile of steaming horseshite at every turn.
The point is, my point is, every single time you make a statement, any statement, it is patently false or misleading. Who can trust anything you say (or spout off) concerning internet privacy or lack of it? Or, again, anything you say. Every-time you are challenged you resort to talking out of your backside.
Even the links you provide are complete rubbish. Apart from which, that "cookie error" is, as I stated, an absolute first for me... it came as a response to the anti-spyware protections in my browser-- which your site, indirectly, politely asked me to turn off. Ironically, your poot is probably choked with spyware, which I find risible to the extreme.
And this BS:Quote:
And the simple Google Sat that you are using now for maps and streets was leased to them by the NSA and was high tech for the NSA, back in the 1970's!
Rofl, Google Earth changes into aerial photography as you zoom in. Plus Google source their sat images from all over the place. Yet another glaring blooper.
Quote:
And if this is such a bloody issue, then pray tell how do the Astronauts and the Sat's give back such crystal clear pics, you can see this by using google for crying out loud.
LOL. For crying out loud, what does that have to do with resolving a numberplate/counting the dimples on a golf ball from a spy satellite? I'll tell you... nothing! As per. Even if you could put up a mirror big enough to do it atmospheric interference will blur it. That's why they usually resort to very small hard-to-detect cloud-beating remote controlled spyplanes nowadays (we've all seen them). Not, I repeat not, impossibly fast super-duper-hyper-diaper-sonic manned spyplanes. On top of that, remote high-altitude large-wing transparent solar-powered spyplanes in permanent flight are more likely in the future, if they don't have them already and it's not too cloudy to take a shot.
I'm willing to admit the USA has the best tech available. (Although the jets that jerk "W" pressured Australia to contract buy are utter crap compared to what could have been bought for half the price from elsewhere). That does not make your fantastic claims any more plausible, no matter how insulting you choose to get.
Mez's description of the type of person you are seems spot on. Wallow in your arrogance, ignoramus. Liar, if you ever were in the army I sure know what you were discharged for... you discharge.
Have a nice day!
@Mez, I was in that discussion of the Google discovery of Atlantis. I laughed myself sick at that one... you could see my wit if you reviewed it. Not surprised you bought that up mate. As for that pathetic "sycophant" insult of Dan's... I wish I could become your AD buddy but you seem to not have a profile page, nevermind. Regards.
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
DSE VZ300-
Zilog Z80 CPU, 32KB RAM (16K+16K cartridge), video processor 6847, 2KB video RAM, 16 colours (text mode), 5.25" FDD
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 16. June 2010 @ 18:25
|
|
Daniel_1
Suspended permanently
|
26. June 2010 @ 02:35 |
Link to this message
|
|
Jemborg, the only rude people here are the ones that still question me after I posted links-names-phone numbers and contacts that back up what I have said, and the self same people who are complaining about this are the same ones that refuse to check the sources.
As such I stand by what I said. No skin off my nose if you dont believe facts.
|
Senior Member
|
28. June 2010 @ 08:38 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Daniel_1:
Jemborg, the only rude people here are the ones that still question me after I posted links-names-phone numbers and contacts that back up what I have said, and the self same people who are complaining about this are the same ones that refuse to check the sources.
As such I stand by what I said. No skin off my nose if you dont believe facts.
I think there are times like these that you should look yourself in the mirror and ask yourself, "are you off your medication Dan?"
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
DSE VZ300-
Zilog Z80 CPU, 32KB RAM (16K+16K cartridge), video processor 6847, 2KB video RAM, 16 colours (text mode), 5.25" FDD
|
|
Daniel_1
Suspended permanently
|
28. June 2010 @ 10:48 |
Link to this message
|
The ONLY one that is off their medication is you Jemborg. I have a newspaper here from Billings Montana (just got back from vacation) and the front page has a very nice story about a hacker that hacked two other wifi accounts and then sent child porn and threats to elected officials because the hacker did not like the two people and wanted to get them into trouble. How did the Montana Bureau of Investigation (Montana's version of the FBI) get info and capture this hacker? They STUDIED THE LOGS OF THE COMPUTER AND THE LOGS OF THE WIFI MODEM AND TRACED IT RIGHT BACK TO THE IDIOT. And oh yes, he had the "hide my ip" program installed as well as trying to spoof his IP but it did not work as they got his butt! But was it able to hide the individual and unique IP Ident that every computer has built right in and cannot be spoofed or copied? Seemingly not or this creep would have got away with this
Just another kick in the head to you and all the others that think that by spoofing or using some stupid program that they can hide from the experts that want them. But feel free to keep trying to pass on your ignorance and then attacking someone that destroys your little rose colored world. Just remember to let us all know where to send you the soap on a rope
|
Senior Member
|
28. June 2010 @ 11:41 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Daniel_1:
The ONLY one that is off their medication is you Jemborg. I have a newspaper here from Billings Montana (just got back from vacation) and the front page has a very nice story about a hacker that hacked two other wifi accounts and then sent child porn and threats to elected officials because the hacker did not like the two people and wanted to get them into trouble. How did the Montana Bureau of Investigation (Montana's version of the FBI) get info and capture this hacker? They STUDIED THE LOGS OF THE COMPUTER AND THE LOGS OF THE WIFI MODEM AND TRACED IT RIGHT BACK TO THE IDIOT. And oh yes, he had the "hide my ip" program installed as well as trying to spoof his IP but it did not work as they got his butt! But was it able to hide the individual and unique IP Ident that every computer has built right in and cannot be spoofed or copied? Seemingly not or this creep would have got away with this
Just another kick in the head to you and all the others that think that by spoofing or using some stupid program that they can hide from the experts that want them. But feel free to keep trying to pass on your ignorance and then attacking someone that destroys your little rose colored world. Just remember to let us all know where to send you the soap on a rope
Not my little rose coloured world champ... if you'd been paying attention I'm an Aussie. LOL. That does not happen here yet.
Regardless of whether the Montana business is true or not (you do just make stuff up as you go along obviously) does not account for the endless stream of rudeness and absolute bullcrap you post to impress.
You are a perfect example of what I wrote in my signature (yes, I am quoting myself there).
...And totally and blissfully off your rocker.
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
DSE VZ300-
Zilog Z80 CPU, 32KB RAM (16K+16K cartridge), video processor 6847, 2KB video RAM, 16 colours (text mode), 5.25" FDD
|
|
xtago
Senior Member
|
28. June 2010 @ 15:39 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Daniel_1:
Here, if you are that ignorant...is a link that shows a sat showing you an up close and personal look at home plate on a baseball field from 200 miles up!
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iREy1...nK0s2gD931EIO80
Here is a link to a story where they can identify you from 200 miles up JUST BY YOUR SHADOW AND GAIT!! http://www.spacelove.org/ as well as clearly telling you that the KNOWN Military spy sats can go clear down to 10 CM! And you have no idea what the classified spy sats can do, but as I said with my Cosmic Top Secret security Clearance from the Military...I DO!!! And the simple Google Sat that you are using now for maps and streets was leased to them by the NSA and was high tech for the NSA, back in the 1970's!
My GOD Mez, even people in Shelbyville Tenn know more then you do! http://www.t-g.com/blogs/thomwilliamson/entry/15995/desc
Mez, You REALLY should stop while people think your ignorant then continue on and remove all doubt as you are getting thumped very badly on this issue.
Aurora is a UAV, how you get a pilot etc is beyond me as no human can fit inside one.
Was used in the Iraq war, the US gov had it all over the media, there's much better ones.
An Australian company sells heaps of them to all sorts of military and company people.
It's not exactly top secret stuff and they are used for all sorts of stuff like seeing how crops are growing and what the yield should be with IR cameras.
link 1: doesn't exist.
Link 2: is a podcasting site, about Russian space parties. Odd I guess seeing as your talking about USA.
As you'd be able to read in the corner of google maps doesn't use NSA maps but private sector sat maps, from about 5 different companies.
That is so the correct copyright is given for the use of those sat maps so your saying someone else has made those sat maps tisk tisk, you would have broken the copyright holders rights.
|
Senior Member
|
28. June 2010 @ 16:09 |
Link to this message
|
Its a lot easier being righteous than right.
DSE VZ300-
Zilog Z80 CPU, 32KB RAM (16K+16K cartridge), video processor 6847, 2KB video RAM, 16 colours (text mode), 5.25" FDD
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
28. June 2010 @ 16:42 |
Link to this message
|
Hey, Dan see you are back for more punishment. I would like to say your last post is nuts but I can't. You are mostly correct on this one. If you are using a hide your IP address and they want you bad enough, you are more vulnerable than if you didn't use any. If you don't use any you can always claim someone hacked yours which is easy enough to do as well as fairly common place. No one will believe some one hacked into your computer then used your credit card to hide your computer. The 'hide your IP site' naturally has the fake IP address you purchased as well as the real IP address otherwise how does it know where to forward the stuff. This was not any magic mumbo-jumbo where they used an unhide-able water mark magically burned into your computer.
I would quit this one while you are ahead.
|
|
