Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., the Japanese industry giant behind Panasonic, announced at Consumer Electronics Show (CES) that it will launch Internet-ready plasma televisions that support Youtube videos and Google web albums. The rival Sony responded with its own announcement that they will also bring Internet video to upcoming TVs. Sony's new brand of TVs will feature content from ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
cool stuff Panasonic, but a bit last gen to all of us with a media centre pc!
Quote:Sony responded with its own announcement that they will also bring Internet video to upcoming TVs. Sony's new brand of TVs will feature content from AOL, Yahoo, Sony Pictures Entertainment and Sony BMG Music.
at what cost, the usual sony extortionate rates apply i suppose?
Originally posted by FTA link: Posted Jan 7th 2008 10:43PM by Christopher Grant
Sony BMG Music Entertainment just announced Platinum MusicPass, retail gift cards which can be traded in for digital music, delivered to you in "high-quality" ? and notably DRM-free ? MP3 files. No word on precisely what bitrate constitutes high-quality, but for $12.99 (or $19.99 for a couple special edition albums) you can pick up a card from a local retailer, scratch the back, enter the pin number on MusicPass.com and download the MP3s (and sometimes bonus material). Is it perhaps inadvisable to require consumers to leave the internet, go to a store to purchase a MusicPass card, only to return home to the internet to download the DRM-free track? Hey, we're not business majors here and ? judging by the initial album offerings ? we're not their target demographic either. Celine Dion and Kenny Chesney, really?
$12.99 for a digital album, has anyone told sony that there are very little overheads with digital distribution thus making it cheaper for consumers?
Or is it rip of the artists & consumer time, yet again!
Originally posted by : Ars; Full Low Down On RIAA Screw Over Via Link: Radiohead: Artists often screwed by digital downloads
You might think, if you didn't work in the music business, that famous artists stand to make mad cash from popular albums on iTunes and other digital storefronts. Sadly, that's not the case, and Radiohead frontman Thom Yorke has spent the last week calling out the labels for it. He recently told BBC Radio 4 that "the big infrastructure of the music business has not addressed the way artists communicate directly with their fans. In fact, they seem to basically get in the way. Not only do they get in the way, but they take all the cash."
Yorke said the same thing in a widely-quoted recent interview with David Byrne. His advice to young artists in that piece was, "Don't sign a huge record contract that strips you of all your digital rights, so that when you do sell something on iTunes you get absolutely zero. That would be the first priority." He went on to say that selling the new album, In Rainbows, directly to fans made the band more money from digital distribution than "all the other Radiohead albums put together, forever."
This seems like a step in the right direction for those who don't want to buy or upgrade to a media center pc. One question though, why do I need to watch some kid get hit in the nuts with a soup can on youtube in widescreen? Most of those videos are made with low end cell phones or web cams. I can only imagine how grainy and pixilated the videos will look on a larger screen.
I know they mentioned new regulated video services, but promoting you tube? Just seems like a gimmick to me.
This basically means in the near future we are going to get TV's that have all the new high definition stuff plus an internet connection or wireless blutooth connection for internet connection and then we can do everything with our TV's and well this i am sure what people are doing already but this innovation is going to simplify the whole process.
