|
Labels tell artists 'we gave your money to our lawyers'
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 2 March, 2008
While there are some people opposed to RIAA royalty collection tactics and others who take the labels' side, one thing both sides generally agree on is the importance of paying artists. That is, of course, unless you count the labels themselves as representing their own side.
Last year RIAA member companies successfully negotiated deals with a number of websites whose operators had been ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
3. March 2008 @ 00:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
Cheapos!
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
|
3. March 2008 @ 00:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
I can imagine a world where record labels no longer exist. And thats in the very near future.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
3. March 2008 @ 00:17 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by 21Q:
I can imagine a world where record labels no longer exist. And thats in the very near future.
I like your future!
"The flimsier the product,the higher the price"
Ferengi 82nd rule of aqusition
 |
Staff Member
2 product reviews
|
3. March 2008 @ 00:29 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by 21Q:
I can imagine a world where record labels no longer exist. And thats in the very near future.
I don't see that as likely, but I won't be surprised if they're devalued to the point where companies with workable business models take them over. The days of labels making their money from music distribution are done.
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
3. March 2008 @ 00:38 |
Link to this message
|
|
They haven't been able to pay me what they owe me.. Maybe they have spent MY money on chasing sharers too.. Funny thing is.. I can't find my music being shared anywhere, and I have spent more than I am owed chasing the ******* for the ca$h.. It would be nice to break even.
Stuff that for a game of soldiers.. If I ever release any more music it will go straight on to the p2p sites.. at least then the suits don't get any more from me, and just maybe some people will get to enjoy without paying fat cats through the nose for it while I see nothing.
Their business is bankrupt.. download, burn and give away.. If you feel guilty send the artists a couple of $$'s (or donate to a good charity and tell them who you paid).. It's more than they would ever see if you bought it!!!!!
|
|
cousinkix
Inactive
|
3. March 2008 @ 00:47 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
I can imagine a world where record labels no longer exist. And thats in the very near future.
It's here now! Some artists offer direct downloads from their official homepages. Third parties such as www.nugs.net host several bands on their website too. You can pay with a credit/debit card or use PayPal in some cases. I buy lossless FLAC downloads myself and none of the money goes to that RIAA mafia.
|
|
nobrainer
Suspended permanently
|
3. March 2008 @ 04:33 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by 21Q:
I can imagine a world where record labels no longer exist. And thats in the very near future.
Well lets hope the bad ones disappear, that dictate what the rules are, bribe stations to only play RIAA music (payola deals sony's forte), steal from artists and block indie bands air play and royalties and these companies are: Sony, Warner, EMI and Universal obviously!
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 3. March 2008 @ 04:35
|
|
atomicxl
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
3. March 2008 @ 10:18 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by 21Q:
I can imagine a world where record labels no longer exist. And thats in the very near future.
This is the same fantasy land where radio gladly plays any and all music made. Eventually artists will be like, "I wish there was someway we could come together on one name so that we could have more bargaining power. I'm not saying we should be a group, but maybe if we could label ourselves as one entitiy, things would be better and easier for all."
People who say this type of stuff usually haven't the SLIGHTEST idea about how the music industry operates. All they see is that their favorite cd is $9.99 and they feel like they're getting ripped off so they spew nonsense.
Labels are a major benefit. You may not like major labels (shame on anyone for promoting artists, pushing songs at radio, paying for album recording, mixing and mastering, buying advertising slots, paying for tours... thats the work of satan!) but labels are a critical part of the industry.
|
|
emugamer
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
3. March 2008 @ 12:05 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by 21Q:
I can imagine a world where record labels no longer exist. And thats in the very near future.
This is the same fantasy land where radio gladly plays any and all music made. Eventually artists will be like, "I wish there was someway we could come together on one name so that we could have more bargaining power. I'm not saying we should be a group, but maybe if we could label ourselves as one entitiy, things would be better and easier for all."
People who say this type of stuff usually haven't the SLIGHTEST idea about how the music industry operates. All they see is that their favorite cd is $9.99 and they feel like they're getting ripped off so they spew nonsense.
Labels are a major benefit. You may not like major labels (shame on anyone for promoting artists, pushing songs at radio, paying for album recording, mixing and mastering, buying advertising slots, paying for tours... thats the work of satan!) but labels are a critical part of the industry.
Labels may have been a critical part of the industry in the past, but they refuse to evolve, at the detriment of the artist. They may or may not be needed for new and up and coming artists - that's debateable and I won't argue for or against it. But it's been proven that an established artist really has no use for them anymore. Radiohead, or Neil Young for example can rely on their name alone and the internet to do all the advertising, marketing and distributing.
And I agree that an Artist group should be formed. That would be a great idea. AFA (Artists For Artists). Create their own trade group where younger artists can be funded and have access to marketing resources - without a third party getting involved, whose only concern is the bottom line dollar. That kind of system (what we have now) only bastardizes the art of music.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 3. March 2008 @ 20:57
|
Junior Member
|
3. March 2008 @ 12:53 |
Link to this message
|
LOL... This reminds me of the "windshild" business!
When business is low, you go out with your baseball bat at night,
and smash a few car windshilds and... guess what?!!
Yep, you have new business!
So, if your lawyers need a "retainer" (to keep them working for you),
you have to bust a few websites to pay them!
Artists to get paid? No way... we (RIAA) are in the Windshild business!
Cheers!
|
Member
|
3. March 2008 @ 15:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
BAH-HAH-HA!
There is some justice after all.
Smell it, "artists."
Smell what you got in bed with.
|
|
numscull
Junior Member
|
3. March 2008 @ 16:40 |
Link to this message
|
"We can't pay you(artists), we are broke because we have to pay the lawyers first.", said the RIAA as they drove off into the sunset in their Mercedes, Ferrari's, and Bentlys.
|
|
llongtheD
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
3. March 2008 @ 23:38 |
Link to this message
|
|
@atomicxl
Wake up dude, there is more than one way to skin a cat. They WERE once a critical part, but their greed has blinded them. The business model they're following, suing people for not buying their formula music, is a sinking ship. Some artists are waking up to this fact, by releasing their albums independently, and over the internet. Do you really believe a great band couldn't find sponsorship elsewhere?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 3. March 2008 @ 23:49
|
|
jb2453
Newbie
|
4. March 2008 @ 00:20 |
Link to this message
|
|
At the end of the day the lawyers were the only ones who ever profited from illegal downloading. The irony in this is almost comical.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 4. March 2008 @ 00:23
|
|
llongtheD
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
4. March 2008 @ 00:26 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Quote:
Originally posted by 21Q:
I can imagine a world where record labels no longer exist. And thats in the very near future.
This is the same fantasy land where radio gladly plays any and all music made. Eventually artists will be like, "I wish there was someway we could come together on one name so that we could have more bargaining power. I'm not saying we should be a group, but maybe if we could label ourselves as one entitiy, things would be better and easier for all."
People who say this type of stuff usually haven't the SLIGHTEST idea about how the music industry operates. All they see is that their favorite cd is $9.99 and they feel like they're getting ripped off so they spew nonsense.
Labels are a major benefit. You may not like major labels (shame on anyone for promoting artists, pushing songs at radio, paying for album recording, mixing and mastering, buying advertising slots, paying for tours... thats the work of satan!) but labels are a critical part of the industry.
Labels may have been a critical part of the industry in the past, but they refuse to evolve, at the detriment of the artist. They may or may not be needed for new and up and coming artists - that's debateable and I won't argue for or against it. But it's been proven that an established artist really has no use for them anymore. Radiohead, or Neil Young for example can rely on their name alone and the internet to do all the advertising, marketing and distributing.
And I agree that an Artist group should be formed. That would be a great idea. AFA (Artists For Artists). Create their own trade group where younger artists can be funded and have access to marketing resources - without a third party getting involved, whose only concern is the bottom line dollar. That kind of system (what we have now) only bastardizes the art of music.
I couldn't agree with you more emugamer.
|
|
Icanbe
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
4. March 2008 @ 12:53 |
Link to this message
|
"But really, even if both of those things are true and the labels don't have any money left over, shouldn't that be their own problem, rather than being passed along to parties with no voice at the negotiating table?"
Exactly, Wake up Labels, RIAA, that's your problem, not the artists.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 4. March 2008 @ 13:20
|
|
phoenixmg
Member
|
4. March 2008 @ 14:42 |
Link to this message
|
Anybody else find it ironic that as much as the RIAA & the entertainment industry is in the public eye as far as bemoaning the evils of file sharing and piracy, that they're just as bad (Or in this case, worse than) as the people who're at their homes doing the "crimes" that they bitch about?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 4. March 2008 @ 14:43
|
|
nobrainer
Suspended permanently
|
5. March 2008 @ 07:18 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Icanbe:
"But really, even if both of those things are true and the labels don't have any money left over, shouldn't that be their own problem, rather than being passed along to parties with no voice at the negotiating table?"
Exactly, Wake up Labels, RIAA, that's your problem, not the artists.
The RIAA does the labels bidding, just as the MPAA fronts for the movie industry, they are told what to do by Big Media not the other way around!
They are used as a smoke screen so Bad Press does not effect sales.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 5. March 2008 @ 07:24
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
5. March 2008 @ 21:19 |
Link to this message
|
So they Sue people For UnGodly inflated amounts of money. and your telling me you have not a dime left. The RIAA are So full of SH*T it isn't funny. if i was caught Downloading and the RIAA tried to Sue me, i would much prefer to go to a gun store buy A 10 gage shotty go to the court room and blow my brains out than pay those fee's.
lets see $10,000 a song i have about 1,000 P2Ped Songs, with my current pay that would make me your slave for almost 28 years. keeping a minimum of 260 dollars in my pockets and the rest to the RIAA.
|
|
jetyi83
Member
|
6. March 2008 @ 14:43 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by 21Q:
I can imagine a world where record labels no longer exist. And thats in the very near future.
not likely. this is an option for existing bands that people already know about but it wont work for new artists
bands cant market themselves as well as if they had the record companies backing them.
it might move in a different direction where instead of a record labels a new web site label will emerge that could offer direct downloads. I could see that happening in the future.. 5-10 years
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. March 2008 @ 14:48
|
|
emugamer
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
6. March 2008 @ 16:31 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by 21Q:
I can imagine a world where record labels no longer exist. And thats in the very near future.
not likely. this is an option for existing bands that people already know about but it wont work for new artists
bands cant market themselves as well as if they had the record companies backing them.
This is true because of the way artists have always been marketed. Put some makeup and new clothing on them, establish a new trend and saturate them in it so as to create an illusion of being hip, and convince people that they are deep and in tune with them by spending a couple million on a vapid music video. It has to be more about the music as opposed to the image. Which is why they need support from those who are established. They need endorsements from bigger artists. Big name artists should be proactive in reaching out to younger artists whom they themselves truly suuport to help them get the exposure they need. And not just in the form of touring with them. That works (I remember seeing Ben Kweller for the first time when he was touring with Jeff Tweedy about 8 years ago - I thought he was a very talented scrapper at the time), but there are too many up-and-comers for that to be a practical solution to work for everyone. An established artist should offer free marketing resources that may be available to them. There should be a more close knit community for each genre.
Music Utopia. Will it ever happen....??? Probably not any time soon, but at least the foundation for some form of change is being laid.
|
|
Musky179
Newbie
|
7. March 2008 @ 05:21 |
Link to this message
|
Maybe 2 or 3 artists should get their BAR licence and donate some time in court to represent the artists.That way the RIAA would have no excuse for not paying out the proceeds they gain from the lawsuits.Everyone is entitled to a "representative" of their choice in court.
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
7. March 2008 @ 08:53 |
Link to this message
|
|
Any artist that signs up with a label should be committed! Well, maybe if they would carry me because I was cute and a great dresser but had no tallent I would concider it.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
6 product reviews
|
20. April 2008 @ 21:32 |
Link to this message
|
|
So much for the music artists making more or getting their money back. We all said that the lawyers will win in the long run.
|
