User User name Password  
   
Tuesday 7.1.2025 / 09:57
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > software specific discussion > dvd shrink forum > what do you think is the minimum watchable compression pctg?
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
What do you think is the minimum watchable compression pctg?
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
SaxonSL
Newbie
_
14. May 2008 @ 16:42 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I'm wondering what some experienced shrinkers think about this. There is always the enigma of how many extra features we can afford to include on our backups, and at what quality. I tend to get the best quality possible on my flick, and the lowest on extras--leaving out trailers and stuff. If I have to, I'll get the main movie only with no menus.

BUT my observation is that at compression leaving 70% of original quality I can't tell a lot of difference. Even a bit lower than that.

As a matter of fact, it mystifies me how a DivX backup (which I will do on disks that aren't quite as important to me) can still be pretty watchable at 700 megs, which is way compressed.

Just interested in where you guys draw the line. When is a film too compressed to be enjoyable?
Advertisement
_
__
AfterDawn Addict

1 product review
_
14. May 2008 @ 16:48 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Divx different format as compared to dvd, like apples to oranges.

As far as dvd, I personally do not like to go below 80%

"The flimsier the product,the higher the price"
Ferengi 82nd rule of aqusition


SaxonSL
Newbie
_
14. May 2008 @ 16:55 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I realize DivX is a different format. But it's not apples to oranges because we're ultimately just talking about compressing a film file. My only point is that it's amazing that so much compression can leave a film still looking pretty good.
AfterDawn Addict

1 product review
_
14. May 2008 @ 17:05 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by SaxonSL:
I realize DivX is a different format.
Quote:
But it's not apples to oranges because we're ultimately just talking about compressing a film file.
My only point is that it's amazing that so much compression can leave a film still looking pretty good.

Thats like saying you can fix a Porsche with parts from a Yugo. We are talking parts is parts.

"The flimsier the product,the higher the price"
Ferengi 82nd rule of aqusition


SaxonSL
Newbie
_
14. May 2008 @ 18:42 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
You're having an entirely different conversation, my friend. I'm talking about viewability, not the technical aspects of one file format vs. another.

I can't compare parts of a Yugo to those of a Porsche, no, but I can certainly compare the feel of driving one car to another. That's the difference here. I'm not saying divx is the same as vob, I'm simply talking about plain viewability and I happened to mention divx as an aside. Think you can possibly comprehend that?
AfterDawn Addict

1 product review
_
14. May 2008 @ 18:58 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by SaxonSL:
You're having an entirely different conversation, my friend.
Quote:
I'm talking about viewability, not the technical aspects of one file format vs. another
.




But viewability is based on the technical aspects of any file system.
While there exist multitudes of dvd players, few if any I know of play an avi file (pcs exempted) on a disc




I can't compare parts of a Yugo to those of a Porsche, no, but I can certainly compare the feel of driving one car to another. That's the difference here. I'm not saying divx is the same as vob, I'm simply talking about plain viewability and I happened to mention divx as an aside. Think you can possibly comprehend that?


"The flimsier the product,the higher the price"
Ferengi 82nd rule of aqusition


olyteddy
Senior Member
_
14. May 2008 @ 22:22 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Quote:
But viewability is based on the technical aspects of any file system.
While there exist multitudes of dvd players, few if any I know of play an avi file (pcs exempted) on a disc

Actually, according to this: http://www.videohelp.com/dvdplayers?DVDn...by=Name&hits=50 there are thousands that can play Xvid & DivX
Senior Member
_
14. May 2008 @ 22:34 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
For me, 65-70% is the cutoff. If I care about the movie (say the Dark Knight when it comes out on DVD [a long time from now]), there is no way I'd even consider it being at 70%. Dual layer all the way!

But if it's an animated series, say American Dad, I'll leave it at 60-65%. Other movies that I don't care about, I'll let it slide at that point as well.

Latest AnyDVD to rip > VOBB to blank the unwanted on a DVD > Shrink to compress > ImgBurn to burn = Never starting a thread asking how to backup a movie
AfterDawn Addict
_
15. May 2008 @ 02:13 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
there are alot of variables on compression

1. programs used (DVD Rebulider can make a movie thats compressed up to 50% or more look like the original)

2. the size of the TV your playing it back on (say a 60" Sony SXRD compared to a 31" CRT) theres going to be a huge difference between the two playing back a movie compressed to 65%

so it all comes down to your setup there NO set standard on compression. SaxonSL you need to list your setup for us to give you correct advice




Antec 1200 Full-Tower Case/Thermaltake 750-Watt PS/ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77 Mobo/Western Digital Black WD500 500GB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache/NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTX 384-bit GDDR3 PCI Express Video Card/CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM 16GB DDR3 /Intel Core i7-3770K Ivy Bridge 3.5GHz (3.9GHz Turbo)/CORSAIR Hydro High Performance Liquid CPU Cooler/3-Asus DRW-24B1ST Sata Drives/Samsung 2493HM 24" LCD Monitior 1920x1200 resolution,5ms respone time/OS Windows 10 Pro SP1 64-bit

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 15. May 2008 @ 02:14

AfterDawn Addict
_
15. May 2008 @ 22:31 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Zoso's right about the set up and all. But it just seems to me what the viewed product looks like is the parameter. I've got friends who can't see very well and they think there TVs look good-NOT. One had a projection set, brand new-Mitsubishi-, and the color guns were never properly aligned when it was set up.Red and blue halos around everything. They thought it had a lovely picture. It took me two years to tell them the damn thing was set up wrong. We got the manual out and fixed it. LOL 70% looks good to me on an upconvert player & 40" Sammy LCD.


SaxonSL
Newbie
_
16. May 2008 @ 00:47 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by iluvendo:
Originally posted by SaxonSL:
You're having an entirely different conversation, my friend.
Quote:
I'm talking about viewability, not the technical aspects of one file format vs. another
.




But viewability is based on the technical aspects of any file system.
While there exist multitudes of dvd players, few if any I know of play an avi file (pcs exempted) on a disc


LOL, I've owned several DVD players and they've all played AVI and I believe the last few have come with DivX compatibility right out of the box. You're still completely missing the point. I can compare the "viewability" of a projected movie in a theater to a TV screen. They are completely different, but I can compare them. However, I give up. I don't get the idea you're one to admit you simply misunderstood something.
SaxonSL
Newbie
_
16. May 2008 @ 00:54 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Zoso, excellent point about setup. I have a smallish widescreen LCD I think a bit less than 30-inch and that may be why I tend to be as pleased with as much as 70% of original file size. And why some DivX conversions (oops, not supposed to admit that exists! :) ) look surprisingly decent to me. I agree with all of you that 70 is probably the threshold and I will accept it only on something like an original old TV show or animation or something where sparkling picture is less of a factor. On pretty much any new movie that I care at all about, I won't back my DVD up unless I can do it at 90 or so. Otherwise, I just worry about what I SHOULD be seeing when I watch it. Might as well back it up by buying an extra copy, since prices are reasonable. I also buy a lot of close-out DVD from places like amazon.com--amazing what you can find for five bucks or less after it's been out a while. But that really IS a whole different subject.
AfterDawn Addict
_
16. May 2008 @ 01:28 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
yeah with an 30" LCD 70% is fine you could probably get away with 65% and be ok.

consider using DVD Rebuilder to backup you're next high compression movie, your be pleasantly surprised on how good the picture quality is even if its at 50% also just backup the movie only cutting out all the preveiws extras etc. that helps lots too




Antec 1200 Full-Tower Case/Thermaltake 750-Watt PS/ASUS SABERTOOTH Z77 Mobo/Western Digital Black WD500 500GB 7200 RPM 64MB Cache/NVIDIA GeForce 8800GTX 384-bit GDDR3 PCI Express Video Card/CORSAIR DOMINATOR PLATINUM 16GB DDR3 /Intel Core i7-3770K Ivy Bridge 3.5GHz (3.9GHz Turbo)/CORSAIR Hydro High Performance Liquid CPU Cooler/3-Asus DRW-24B1ST Sata Drives/Samsung 2493HM 24" LCD Monitior 1920x1200 resolution,5ms respone time/OS Windows 10 Pro SP1 64-bit
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
AfterDawn Addict
_
16. May 2008 @ 08:01 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Most all backups I do are main movie only-nothing else. Most of the DL discs come out at 100% or at least 90% and I can't tell the difference.


afterdawn.com > forums > software specific discussion > dvd shrink forum > what do you think is the minimum watchable compression pctg?
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork