|
60$ graphics card
|
|
Member
2 product reviews
|
9. September 2008 @ 19:11 |
Link to this message
|
Which would be a better graphics card fo 60$? the Nvidia 9500 gt or the ATI HD 3650 sapphire? I think they should be about equal but which one handles games better. (Im not expecting crysis or anything so dont bother telling me) just some light gaming..
thanks
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
9. September 2008 @ 21:19 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'd go with the 3650.
|
Member
2 product reviews
|
9. September 2008 @ 22:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
thanks I was leaning more towards that one. is that the best for 60$ or is there an even better card?
thanks again.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
10. September 2008 @ 09:24 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'd stick with the 3650, unless you can find a 3850 or 8800GS for 60 dollars, which I'm doubtful of.
|
|
spamual
Suspended permanently
|
10. September 2008 @ 09:47 |
Link to this message
|
|
id say the 4670 which is released today
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
10. September 2008 @ 09:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
Not in the US, seemingly.
|
|
spamual
Suspended permanently
|
10. September 2008 @ 12:35 |
Link to this message
|
|
:(
brilliant card for the price aswell
the 9600GT is near $100 aswell
|
AfterDawn Addict
15 product reviews
|
11. September 2008 @ 21:18 |
Link to this message
|
|
Yeah, you can get a 3850 or 9600GT for not much more.
The 4670 looks decent as well if you can get it. Certainly much faster than a 3650. About equal to a 3850 it seems.
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 4GHz(20 x 200) 1.5v 3000NB 2000HT, Corsair Hydro H110 w/ 4 x 140mm 1500RPM fans Push/Pull, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5, 8GB(2 x 4GB) G.Skill RipJaws DDR3-1600 @ 1600MHz CL9 1.55v, Gigabyte GTX760 OC 4GB(1170/1700), Corsair 750HX
Detailed PC Specs: http://my.afterdawn.com/estuansis/blog_entry.cfm/11388This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 11. September 2008 @ 21:22
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
12. September 2008 @ 05:10 |
Link to this message
|
Yeah that's about what I expected. I'm a little out of touch with the midrange cards on offer now, there's so many of them, HD3600s and HD3400s, 9500s, 9800GTs, and so on and so forth. So far all I've gathered is that a 9800GT is about 10-15% slower than an HD4850, which would make it approximately equal to an 8800GTS.
|
AfterDawn Addict
15 product reviews
|
12. September 2008 @ 12:34 |
Link to this message
|
|
It IS an 8800GTS. Just with slightly lower clocks.
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 4GHz(20 x 200) 1.5v 3000NB 2000HT, Corsair Hydro H110 w/ 4 x 140mm 1500RPM fans Push/Pull, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5, 8GB(2 x 4GB) G.Skill RipJaws DDR3-1600 @ 1600MHz CL9 1.55v, Gigabyte GTX760 OC 4GB(1170/1700), Corsair 750HX
Detailed PC Specs: http://my.afterdawn.com/estuansis/blog_entry.cfm/11388
|
|
spamual
Suspended permanently
|
12. September 2008 @ 13:04 |
Link to this message
|
no its an 8800GT with higher clock, same SP (112) IICR and a 55nm over 65nm proccess
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
15 product reviews
|
12. September 2008 @ 16:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
Oh yeah, lol
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T 4GHz(20 x 200) 1.5v 3000NB 2000HT, Corsair Hydro H110 w/ 4 x 140mm 1500RPM fans Push/Pull, Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD5, 8GB(2 x 4GB) G.Skill RipJaws DDR3-1600 @ 1600MHz CL9 1.55v, Gigabyte GTX760 OC 4GB(1170/1700), Corsair 750HX
Detailed PC Specs: http://my.afterdawn.com/estuansis/blog_entry.cfm/11388
|
