Browse by topic

Forums

Start a new thread

Jump to:

The following comments relate to this news article:

article published on 8 July, 2011

A group of major US ISPs have reached an agreement with the RIAA & MPAA to punish customers who are accused, but not sued or otherwise prosecuted for, copyright infringement. Once the agreement goes into affect, participating ISPs will be required to punish subscribers for repeated unproven allegations by content owners. Starting with the fifth accusation in a 12 month period, a subscriber ... [ read the full article ]

Please read the original article before posting your comments.

Posted

Message

LordRuss

Senior Member

1 product review

8. July 2011 @ 11:17

Link to this message

This is SO illegal I can't even begin to tell you folks how much!!!

1. In a court of law, it's always the prosecutions case to prove the guilt, NOT the other way around.
2. The defendant has to render personal information to these A*^%$#* in hopes of proving innocence?
3. Guilt is presumed over innocence anyway. Where the F&#$ do these people live!!!
4. The defendant has to pay all the charges. Even before he/she ever gets caught up in this mess (gets added to your monthly bill).

If ever I wanted to put a saddle on a fat assed ambulance chaser and scream "Class Action Law Suit" at the top of my lungs on this one, this would be it. Not only would I be suing ALL the mentioned providers, but the MPAA & RIAA for even pressuring them to go along with it in the first place.

I hope there's a lawyer reading my rant for once...

[ + quote]

http://onlyinrussellsworld.blogspot.com

Start a new thread

afterdawn.com > forums > announcements > news comments >


		User name	Password

		Not registered yet? Register here. Lost your password? Click here.