User User name Password  
   
Friday 24.1.2025 / 12:49
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > software, operating systems and more > windows - p2p software > questions
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
Questions
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
johanand
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
5. July 2004 @ 03:20 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Hello!

My name is Johan Andersson and I am currently working on an in school paper about file sharing from the downloaders (our) perspective. The course is named "IT knowledge".

Please help me by answering the following four simple questions, by replying to this forum thread:


1. If you found software you really wanted, would you purchase a legal copy if you couldn’t download it for free? What does matter when considering buying? Price, easy, speed etc?


2. How can RIAA and others stop illegal file sharing? Any ideas how they could reduce it?


3. Which is the most effective way of reducing illegal file sharing: educating the users about one can get sued or technical protection?


4. How does the future of file sharing look like?

Thank you.

// Johan A
Advertisement
_
__
Moderator
_
5. July 2004 @ 18:29 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
1. yes i would buy it even if i could download it for free. I do not believe that software companies deserve thousands of dollars for 1 piece of software but i also try to consider the truckers, label manufacturers, packagers, etc. that help bring those products to the store. piracy also effects all those people.
2. as far as them being able to stop it, not a chance in hell. they could reduce it buy lowering the costs of things like software, music, and movies. I'll be damned if i'm going to pay $18 for a cd if i've only heard 1 song on the radio. chances are the cd contains 1-2 good songs and a bunch of filler crap. I wouldn't buy a car without test driving it, nor will i buy music without downloading at least a few songs to see if it's worth my hard earned money. if i like it, i buy it, if not, i delete it so there's no harm done.
3. refer to #2. you can try to "educate" all you want, it's borderline nazi tactics already, raising fear will only bring more interest. I would have never smoked pot if my mom didn't tell me not to!
4. the future looks the same as the past, an endless cat and mouse game. as long as humans are a variable in this equation, there will always be 2 sides to this. They come up with a new protection and the guy in the next cubicle leaks how to break it. they sue 500 people on kazaa, 500,000 people on IRC just saw a new movie a month before it hits the theater.

I think the best thing they could possibly do is just bow down, back off, and cut their losses. file sharing exploded when the media got ahold of napster (thanks lars), just let it go, and the numbers will eventually drop.
just my take on things.





http://www.Lonero.net - friend of the forums, great guitar player
#afterdawn (well i have no idea where it is anymore)
Praetor
Moderator
_
5. July 2004 @ 18:35 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Yep! By making things "a no-no" .... they become hot items and demand rises (just look at drugs for instance) ... if they didnt make such a big deal out of it ... maybe it would just be the "geeks" and "college kids" who did the stuff rather than "mainstream people". :)

ASUS A8V Deluxe, A64-3500 @ 2.65
1GB KingMax PC3700
640GB [4x160GB, 7200, 8MB]
XFX 6800GT 256MB
Rules and Policies: http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/2487
Staff Member
_
13. July 2004 @ 14:47 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
In my opinion...

1. I do buy a lot of software, a lot of it is second hand through online auctions as most software ios rediculously priced!

2. Well you'd think by sueing sharers they'd do it eh? Well it doesnt seem to be slowing down, all they are doing is breaking everyone's basic rights to privacy! As for beinging down the actualy networks, 1 goes down, 4 go up, they cant beat it!

3. Neither, nothing CANT be broken and quite obviously fear of being sued is not affecting file sharing at all! The RIAA should watch their back for more counter-suits against they law breaking entering of these networks and ignoring basic human rights!

4. Amazing! Anonymous P2P is next, thats it, it will never go down then! You cant control the net!
Praetor
Moderator
_
13. July 2004 @ 19:16 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Quote:
2. Well you'd think by sueing sharers they'd do it eh? Well it doesnt seem to be slowing down, all they are doing is breaking everyone's basic rights to privacy! As for beinging down the actualy networks, 1 goes down, 4 go up, they cant beat it!
So you cant beat it.... does it mean that it's right?
Quote:
You cant control the net!
Maybe not absolutely but you can effectively control it if the need arises..... someone save us from that day tho


ASUS A8V Deluxe, A64-3500 @ 2.65
1GB KingMax PC3700
640GB [4x160GB, 7200, 8MB]
XFX 6800GT 256MB
Rules and Policies: http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/2487
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
Staff Member
_
13. July 2004 @ 22:07 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I never said p2p was right + i never see real control ever on the net! in my opinion dude!
afterdawn.com > forums > software, operating systems and more > windows - p2p software > questions
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork