|
Samsung to release terrible Galaxy Music phone next month?
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 28 September, 2012
According to multiple sources, Samsung is expected to launch their low-end Galaxy Music smartphone next month.
The device will feature a 3-inch QVGA (240x320-pixel) display, a single-core 850MHz processor, 512MB RAM, 4GB internal storage a 3MP camera and somehow run on Android 4.0.
Additionally, the phone will have front-facing stereo speakers and include built-in music-based features.
... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
|
Morreale
Senior Member
|
28. September 2012 @ 21:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
Cause not everyone can afford a S3 'ya know lol
*\\\****//\\\***//\\\*****
**\\\**//**\\\*//**\\\*******
***\\\//****\\\ ****\\\****
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
|
scorpNZ
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
28. September 2012 @ 23:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
given the horrendous specs ? the article writers an idiot the dam thing hasn't been released yet how would it know the phones performance,from where i'm stand'n those spec's & features ain't to bad for what i assume is a cheapo,certainly got more grunt than my c510a,south america huh! might have to move there so i can get one
|
|
xtago
Senior Member
|
29. September 2012 @ 01:18 |
Link to this message
|
ooh this could be really good currently I'm using my Galaxy S as a wifi hotspot and a jukebox at work.
It stream spotify for 8+ hours a day over the week, and I wouldn't mind something more music based as the Galaxy S and S3 music to head phone output to a stereo is pretty crap at best it's far too low a stock iphone and the old Nokia phones smash it easy.
You have to use EQ programs to get the sound up high enough to be heard properly.
|
|
Taalen
Junior Member
1 product review
|
29. September 2012 @ 06:29 |
Link to this message
|
CPU and RAM is certainly enough to run ICS quite nicely - though possibly not with manufacturer-added clutter on top. While certainly no high-end device, the only thing really terrible in it seems to be the display.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
29. September 2012 @ 20:04 |
Link to this message
|
|
Better specs than the old iphone 3GS... Plenty of people still use those without complaint, I don't see why this is so terrible...
|
Staff Member
4 product reviews
|
29. September 2012 @ 22:12 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by scorpNZ:
given the horrendous specs ? the article writers an idiot the dam thing hasn't been released yet how would it know the phones performance,from where i'm stand'n those spec's & features ain't to bad for what i assume is a cheapo,certainly got more grunt than my c510a,south america huh! might have to move there so i can get one
I may be an 'idiot' but there are plenty of phones out there offered for FREE from the carriers with 2x-5x better specs than this. A single core at 850Mhz is, as posted, terrible. Also, comparing this to your feature phone from 2009 is not really a valid argument, sorry, it's almost 2013.
|
|
scorpNZ
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
30. September 2012 @ 01:47 |
Link to this message
|
|
free with contract..lol..
not sure if sammy make 2x-5x faster phones however the one stated isn't one of those it is what is & you said it about comparing phones,the reviews for past low end sammys seem pretty good at 3stars & above
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
30. September 2012 @ 05:47 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by DVDBack23:
Originally posted by scorpNZ:
given the horrendous specs ? the article writers an idiot the dam thing hasn't been released yet how would it know the phones performance,from where i'm stand'n those spec's & features ain't to bad for what i assume is a cheapo,certainly got more grunt than my c510a,south america huh! might have to move there so i can get one
I may be an 'idiot' but there are plenty of phones out there offered for FREE from the carriers with 2x-5x better specs than this. A single core at 850Mhz is, as posted, terrible. Also, comparing this to your feature phone from 2009 is not really a valid argument, sorry, it's almost 2013.
Can get an iphone 5 or a Galaxy S3 free with contract if you pay enough each month, that point is meaningless...
|
