The U.S.' biggest carrier Verizon, has made a 32GB model of the Samsung Galaxy S4 available online for $299 with contract.
Until this weekend, Verizon only had the 16GB version available for $199.
Of course, the phone has expandable memory via microSD, so the extra $100 to move up a model is definitely not worth it. High-end 16GB microSD cards sell for $10-$20.
Buyers will see their ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
If it is the same as the s3, it can be worth it. Apps can only be installed on the internal sd card, so if you use a lot of apps, you might need it. I have only 1gb free on my 16gb GS3 with around 50 apps total.
I think it was kind of lame of Google/Android developers to force internal storage for app placement. I use to put as many apps as possible on the micro sd card. Yea they want to say that someone might remove the memory card. But who really does that? I don't know anyone. I personally think it is a hassle to remove the card. I can count the amount of times on one hand that I needed to remove the card for some reason.
Originally posted by Tazer247: If it is the same as the s3, it can be worth it. Apps can only be installed on the internal sd card, so if you use a lot of apps, you might need it. I have only 1gb free on my 16gb GS3 with around 50 apps total.
Originally posted by DVDBack23: The S3 did not allow Save to SD? That's heinous.
Yeah. And it was a surprise to everyone I think. I know they were trying to get a way to get apps over to the external, but I don't think they pulled off getting anything more than the app data over to the external.
Originally posted by DVDBack23: The S3 did not allow Save to SD? That's heinous.
Yeah. And it was a surprise to everyone I think. I know they were trying to get a way to get apps over to the external, but I don't think they pulled off getting anything more than the app data over to the external.
I believe that after ICS that if the phone came with internal storage most if not all manufacturers didn't allow the option to save to sd. It may have been a Google thing as well.
Originally posted by Tazer247: Apps can only be installed on the internal sd card, so if you use a lot of apps, you might need it. I have only 1gb free on my 16gb GS3 with around 50 apps total.
yes, more internal memory is a definite requirement since you cannot install apps in external cards unless you root the device that voids warranty, which may not be an option for many.
Originally posted by Tazer247: If it is the same as the s3, it can be worth it. Apps can only be installed on the internal sd card, so if you use a lot of apps, you might need it. I have only 1gb free on my 16gb GS3 with around 50 apps total.
You're a retard for saying something so trivial and ridiculously anti-pragmatic.
50 apps would not eat up 15GB.......unless they're ALL cutting edge, brand new, massively large games.....and I doubt you only have games on your phone. Who knows......with comments like this, I could see you being a phone gaming junky.
Stop treating your phone like it's an appendage and put it down from time to time and stop hoarding apps you likely NEVER USE!
Oh here goes Hearme0 again with his shitty attitude contributing nothing. You really need to get a life and stop trolling to be an ass to people. We don't forget your name and I sure can't forget your wonderful articulate manner of speaking. Leave this site because nothing you say matters and calling someone a retard only proves how "smart" you are
