User User name Password  
   
Thursday 21.11.2024 / 17:55
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > archived forums > ratdvd discussion, help and suggestions > so this is not a re-encoder, correct?
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
so this is not a re-encoder, correct?
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
jayz
Newbie
_
2. June 2005 @ 08:19 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
ok, so it's suppose to compress a DVD 5/9 down to say approx 1gb.
with minimal loss in quality?. This suggest to me it's sort of a encoder (Please correct me if wrong).

Does it restore the compressed file back to original as if it was never compressed?
Staff Member

2 product reviews
_
2. June 2005 @ 09:54 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Since they don't make any claims to lossless compression I think it's a fair assumption that it will lose at least a little quality that you can't get back when you return it to a DVD format. Still, it's very interesting and I may have to try it out one of these days.

Rich Fiscus
@Vurbal on Twitter
AfterDawn Staff Writer
razvi
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
3. June 2005 @ 07:59 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Did some testing. There is some quality loss, on a scale from 50 (worst) to 150 (best picture quality, bigger file). Converting back to DVD adds more loss, i think. I would gladly post screenshots here, but i have no idea how to capture the exact same movie frame from two or more tests (in WMP and Power DVD).
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
iamdb
Newbie
_
4. December 2005 @ 05:14 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I found a size difference in the before and afters, but the end result was neglagable as far as I am concerned, Especially due to how much compression is used to make such a large file so small, allowing it to be transfered much faster over a network, or for archiving several DVD's onto a single disc (again for archiving purposes) sure saves enough space for me that the minor differences do not mean "diddly squat" to me!

A while ago I downloaded a audio file with a odd extension, that brought me to the website that hosted the encripter/decrypoter (or compressor/uncompresser if you prefer) and discovered what I thought was a single somg by its title turned out to be a complete audio CD in the same space. It took forever (it seemed) to un-compress. That is when I realized how spoiled I have become with WinRAR, & WinZIP (although I prefer to use ALZIP now to save soem space). Due to their high speed, but respectivally lower compression ratio! The more compressed a file is the longer it will take to uncompress it. Just think of how many lines of data are involved before and after. I get dizzy when I even attempt to think of it! This program does soem fairly heavy duty compression, so it should be expected to take awhile.
afterdawn.com > forums > archived forums > ratdvd discussion, help and suggestions > so this is not a re-encoder, correct?
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2024 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork