|
Nero launches Nero 7
|
|
|
nohelpme
Senior Member
|
13. October 2005 @ 04:38 |
Link to this message
|
It just gets me a little nervous when a lot of people are seeing different bugs and crashes. I know for myself a stable Nero is neseccary and it is my most used program by far. Any instability would not be acceptable. The current copy of Nero does eveything i ask for and I can honestly say I have never had a crash. It is fast, efficent, and does everything I need it to. Why mess with a product that is not their yet? In time I know it will be...just a time factor that is all.
nooooohelpme (I need help lol)
10 years in the "Scene"
Vote with Your Dollars, Don't Buy Sony Products!
Do we really want Root Kit and DRM on our Computers?
Only Your Dollars will make a difference!
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
Analog_CA
Newbie
|
13. October 2005 @ 08:04 |
Link to this message
|
Nero is getting to be nothing but a joke! Hit the nail on the head? PLEASE...
I bought the retail Ultra 6 back in June and have been having nothing but problems in creating chapters and the images that go on those chapters. I have been in constant email contact with Nero over this, they have confirmed it is a problem and have done nothing to solve it.
On top of that, since it hasn't worked properly since day ONE, Nero *refuses* to provide the upgrade to version 7. They have NO idea of what support is. By the way, checking leaked versions of the new 7, and the same problem exists.
Do the other things work ok? Shrug... I only use it for the DVD side... but I can tell you that I am less than impressed with their (cough) dedication to valued customers and IMHO they haven't a CLUE what providing proper support really means.
|
|
XPimpster
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
13. October 2005 @ 11:18 |
Link to this message
|
For me, When i used Nero 7 before it was released, It had a a bug taht i taught waz serious because it changed all the file extension icons. Also... i coudnt even use Nero Burning ROM. The only thing i was able to use was Nero Start Smart, which is a good program, but personaly.. i like using Nero Burning ROM. When i saw taht it didnt work. I tried unstalling it. But still when i did that, everytime i rebooted my PC, i got a little Promt saying "Nero Backitup expired". So i had to do Window Restore allll the way back to September 20th. Then i got all my file extension icons back and everything.
I believe that Nero 7 is a good program.. but using the Beta version just messed up my computer. I also belive that Nero 6.6.X.X is an also good version of Nero and i love them both. To me, Nero 7 has a lot of stuff to it, and it changes your computer around alot. If you really love what Nero gives you, i recommend you to get Nero 7. But if you just like Nero and just use it and your familar with using a computer and burining stuff and you like the way your computer is rite now... stay with Nero 6.X.X.X.
Nice posting to you guyz.
|
|
SadJoker
Member
|
13. October 2005 @ 11:46 |
Link to this message
|
Nero just keeps adding more and more bloatware to The ahead Nero Suite dont they? adding more useless junk users will never use or need despite their claim end users requested those features. wouldnt be so bad IF you could remove those features you arent planning on ever using completely (yes custom install allows you to remove some features but still leaves in alot of junk).
I had the leaked Nero 7 Retail {or so was claimed retail} installed, tested it came across too many bugs and removed it. Which wasnt what turned me off to Nero 7 ; that was the bloatware's doing.
I'ma gunna keep with 6.6.x.x for now and hope Nero doesnt pull a Roxio - bog down their product so much users literally abandon it
|
|
domie
Member
|
13. October 2005 @ 11:52 |
Link to this message
|
i've been using it for a week now, admittedly i only use it to burn cds and dvds but i haven't encountered any problems in those departments yet, in fact it burns to the dvd about 10 % quicker than Nero 6 which i find strange.
|
Moderator
|
13. October 2005 @ 13:47 |
Link to this message
|
|
i'm personally probably gonna stay with 6.6.0.16 for good as i only burn audio/data cd's and standard 'dvd-video' compilations with Nero, so for me i could've stayed with 6.6.0.0 even. I only really went with all the updates up to 6.6.0.16 as i help out in the Nero forum, but as i mainly help out on logfiles i don't need to go 7 to keep helping ppl. just my five pence.
nero 7 is probably gonna get more bloaty and buggy, but then so does every bit if software/OS by everyone else.
Windows 98SE is a mighty fine OS by the way, some ppl stay with old stuff, just as some ppl like to have everything 'bleeding edge'.
i only recently ditched 98SE, no real reason, i've just grown to like XP more
Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules ***This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. October 2005 @ 13:48
|
Member
|
13. October 2005 @ 15:05 |
Link to this message
|
|
I'm sticking with 6.6.0.16, it works perfectly fine for me, and it's not so bloated.
|
|
ScubaBud
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. October 2005 @ 16:02 |
Link to this message
|
|
Well put creaky! <G>
|
|
j0j081
Junior Member
|
13. October 2005 @ 17:19 |
Link to this message
|
|
I like the fact that you can do a selective install.
|
|
chaunc3y
Newbie
|
13. October 2005 @ 20:09 |
Link to this message
|
I have been using an evaluation copy of 7 now for a few days and given it a good workout. It seems to be fine. I agree with burn-man to a certain extent, I get really sick of people throwing "bug" around so loosely. A true bug needs to be reproduced every time you try to execute a certain function, and more importantly, tech support needs to be able to reproduce the error before the developers will even look at it. If you can reproduce the error, with a legitimate copy then do us all a favor and report it to Nero instead of whining about how crappy their software is.
|
|
gstar20
Junior Member
|
13. October 2005 @ 20:30 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
If you can reproduce the error, with a legitimate copy then do us all a favor and report it to Nero instead of whining about how crappy their software is.
Jesus Christ....Another plane Jane!
|
Senior Member
|
14. October 2005 @ 11:22 |
Link to this message
|
Wow some heated points here and creaky put it very well indeed. I have mostly been a Roxio user but I got an eval copy of Nero 7 I haven't experienced any bugs as of yet and all I have really been using is NeroVisionExpress for DVD's. Why? because I like Roxio better for data, music and VCD creation on the other hand Roxio's dvd engine is slower and quality is weak, Nero on VCD quality is weak so you could say I have the best of both worlds now. Nero and Roxio have added lots of bloat options that either I have a better freeware program or other prefered software. I use MS Digital Image Pro for my photo's. I would be interested in any bugs people have found as honestly this is my first time using Nero but its been almost a month and is doing a very good job on DVD's. NUFF SAID"
|
Moderator
|
14. October 2005 @ 11:46 |
Link to this message
|
|
cheers guys, i try to say it as i see it..
|
|
Virgil_B
Junior Member
|
15. October 2005 @ 03:58 |
Link to this message
|
I for one, do not see any reason to upgrade to Nero 7.0. I have looked at it and if you already have a legitimate copy of 6.6 then I don't see any reason to upgrade.
|
|
Autotek
Newbie
|
15. October 2005 @ 09:35 |
Link to this message
|
I was told that i can burn a 2gig program to cd's using Nero and that it would span the cd's for me but cant seem to figure it out ....can anybody help ?????
|
|
BURN-MAN
Account closed as per user's own request
|
15. October 2005 @ 14:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
Unless it is compressed in some way or another, it is quite impossible.
|
|
gordy11
Junior Member
|
16. October 2005 @ 01:43 |
Link to this message
|
i have been using Nero for years and its pretty good
but sometimes i dont know why it refuses to transcode some vid file you may quikly say ahhhh wrong codecs
but all are installed for the files i get .
in this event i use dvdsanta and it does the job and
it boots straight into the film when out in dvd player
well thats ny twopennyworth hope it helps someone
respects to all who run this great site
gordy11
|
|
woodhouse
Newbie
|
19. October 2005 @ 13:42 |
Link to this message
|
Pariah; Just installed Nero 7 tonight and yes, Shrink & Nero still work together. I was holding my breath for sure. I've burned 3 DVD's so far and with no problems... ;-)
|
|
nrautava
Suspended permanently
|
21. October 2005 @ 06:16 |
Link to this message
|
What are these rumours that if you install Nero 7 then messanger will not work?
Is it true?
|
|
djeon
Newbie
|
21. October 2005 @ 06:43 |
Link to this message
|
I have fought with Nero 7 and last night just uninstalled it. I would burn a audio cd and it would about 7 seconds into every song sound like it would be skipping. The burn was fine as far as cd-dvd speeed was concerned and even plex tools tests that i ran came out fine. Tested it on its own ide chain as i thought that was the problema and still sounded like it was skipping occasionaly. I was on my second burner a 740 plextor and a 716a plextor and it did it on both. Worse on the 740. I just thought i would let everyone know that in my professional opinion it was nero7 causing me all this greif on a simple burn of an audio cd. Nero 7 gets no love on my system until a couple revisions are made, maybe.
|
|
danterl
Account closed as per user's own request
|
25. October 2005 @ 21:11 |
Link to this message
|
|
i had the same skipping problem. It's an awful bug 'cause I wasn't able to notice it in several burnings, It made me waste almost 12 Cdroms. I would burn a audio cd and it would about 7 seconds into every song sound like it would be skipping... :( too bad
|
|
tron228
Newbie
|
25. October 2005 @ 21:40 |
Link to this message
|
|
Its the reason why they halted the launching of this software is that there are lots of bugs (or the one that leaked has lots of bugs). Purchase the registered version and youre ok.
|
|
TroyM
Newbie
|
2. November 2005 @ 10:22 |
Link to this message
|
when adding a song to burn with Nero 7 does any of y'alls songs skip, or start like a second after it should? Mines been doing that. Is that a bug or just me?
|
AfterDawn Addict
6 product reviews
|
2. November 2005 @ 16:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
@TroyM
It really depends in how fast ur burning the music at? 4x should b the max u burn at no fasrwe then u will have erros of skippin etc... If u are burinig that slow and still havin the problem it could b one of 2 other things.
1. The media u are using.
2.The program has a bug.
Edited by DVDBack23
"the mediocre teacher tells. the good teacher explains. the superior teacher demonstrates. the great teacher inspires."- William Aruthur Ward
Website: http://www.ampleblaze.com |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
djeon
Newbie
|
3. November 2005 @ 06:16 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ok well thanks I guess I'm not trying to be a jerk but burning music at 4x is not a fix and rather ridiculous been burning at 24 x + for years why in the hell would I start burning at 4x again? And yes the software has a bug or it was just the release I had as it was a torrent release and not official copy. One more reason to purchase software you use alot.
To add to the real purpose of this thread ---
I believe the whole issue with my skipping was ide drivers on my nforce3 chipset i neglected to notice that i was using the standard windows ones and not invidia ones for the chipset, so any body with this issue should check thier ide controller drivers.
Just my two cents!
|
