|
cd-dvdspeed test
|
|
|
xbill
Member
|
27. January 2006 @ 13:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
IS THERE A GUIDEor info on how to read disc quality +benchmark read.xbill
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
|
gear79
Suspended permanently
|
27. January 2006 @ 13:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
what is it that you are looking for or trying to do with it?
how to read it?
post one up, we'll show you !!
1rst. sig compiled by phantom69 |
|
xbill
Member
|
28. January 2006 @ 05:52 |
Link to this message
|
HI I took a jpg image tryed copy & paste not sure how to post one up as you say,explane please. new to this . useing Nero cd dvd tool would like know what results mean in bench mark -disk quality-scan disk, on burned dvd movies. thanks for the reply. Xbill.
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
28. January 2006 @ 06:18 |
Link to this message
|
You will need to create an account with an online image host such as photobucket or imageshack, both are free. Upload the image to the site and then you can post the direct link created there to here at AD.
Until then, here is a thread on quality scanning: http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/262544
|
|
xbill
Member
|
28. January 2006 @ 07:35 |
Link to this message
|
|
when't to image shack ,not sure if i did this right.it should be apic.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 28. January 2006 @ 10:18
|
|
xbill
Member
|
28. January 2006 @ 07:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
my mistake sorry
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 28. January 2006 @ 10:19
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
28. January 2006 @ 08:31 |
Link to this message
|
|
Use lower case, like this and remove the asterisks [*img]yourimage[*/img]
|
|
gear79
Suspended permanently
|
28. January 2006 @ 11:21 |
Link to this message
|
|
keep in mind, different burners yeild different results, as well as choice of media...
but see the link my buddy cocoloco put up... ;p
1rst. sig compiled by phantom69
|
|
xbill
Member
|
29. January 2006 @ 15:42 |
Link to this message
|
|
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 29. January 2006 @ 16:06
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
29. January 2006 @ 16:02 |
Link to this message
|
|
Come on dude...hit the reply button and look directly above the box you type in, it tells you the correct code.
Lower case letters...
@gear
Are you cuckoo for cocoloco? LOL
Thanks again buddy...
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 29. January 2006 @ 16:03
|
|
xbill
Member
|
29. January 2006 @ 16:27 |
Link to this message
|
|
sorry about that mix up i made a mess of that. can you explane the pi errors& pi failures+ the quality scores mean? whats good or bad? thanks for the help you give me. trying to learn but it's slow .Xbill
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
29. January 2006 @ 16:38 |
Link to this message
|
Congratulations on getting the image up and on a truly hideous scan...LOL
That my freind is terrible, but I've seen worse. Did you look at the thread I gave you a link for a few posts back?
As for an actual explanation, here's a good one: http://club.cdfreaks.com/showthread.php?t=80545
|
|
gear79
Suspended permanently
|
30. January 2006 @ 05:56 |
Link to this message
|
|
looks like the burn was eiter too fast or the original was full of errors..
the scan and link like loco posted offers good info.
i did not look up your burner, but there may be an update..
i'll post the link in a while, i am not at home.... now !
1rst. sig compiled by phantom69
|
|
xbill
Member
|
30. January 2006 @ 07:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
Thanks, been looking at links to learn ;like to know what a good pie& pif score is .and what agood
Qualityscore is. i burnd at 8x
|
|
gear79
Suspended permanently
|
30. January 2006 @ 07:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
well, also according to your scan, the read test was @ 4x, if you run the scan @ 8x you'll get different results.
typically, the lower the PIE/PIF numbers, the better.
i think like 4 and less, but the score suffers from the PIE/PIF failures.
run your scan @ 8x just for kicks and compare the 2..
1rst. sig compiled by phantom69
|
|
xbill
Member
|
30. January 2006 @ 11:39 |
Link to this message
|
Does this burn look any better?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 30. January 2006 @ 12:26
|
|
gear79
Suspended permanently
|
30. January 2006 @ 11:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
i dunno, the image is not showing and the page is out of whack..
1rst. sig compiled by phantom69
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
30. January 2006 @ 12:21 |
Link to this message
|
|
Good grief!!!
|
|
gear79
Suspended permanently
|
30. January 2006 @ 12:43 |
Link to this message
|
|
what loco... do you see something i dont see? !!! lol
1rst. sig compiled by phantom69
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
30. January 2006 @ 14:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
No...that's the point.
|
|
gear79
Suspended permanently
|
30. January 2006 @ 15:42 |
Link to this message
|
|
i dunno whats on your image there xbill, the x just takes you to imageshack !!
you need to make sure you copy the url and put your [quote*]url here[/quote*] and remove the *'s
1rst. sig compiled by phantom69
|
|
xbill
Member
|
30. January 2006 @ 15:58 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
30. January 2006 @ 16:55 |
Link to this message
|
|
Not quotes crack head...img like this [img]your pic url here" border=0>.
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
30. January 2006 @ 16:56 |
Link to this message
|
|
Not quotes crack head...img like this [*img]your pic url here[/*img]. Without the astricks of coarse.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Moderator
1 product review
|
30. January 2006 @ 16:56 |
Link to this message
|
 Like this
|
