Mobile/PDA About Us Advertise here
User User name Password  
  Not registered yet? Register here.
Lost your password? Click here. 		 
  Home   News   Guides   Downloads   Glossary   Hardware   Profiles   Forums   v4  
 Advertise at AfterDawn.com     Link to us!     Private messages     Compose a private message     List of all updated threads     Threads without replies     Search messages
Friday 6.2.2026 / 13:09
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > pc hardware > other pc hardware > low end card plays battlefield 2
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
Low end card plays battlefield 2
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
jaysfan
Member
_ 		24. August 2006 @ 09:20 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Ok here's my question to all you computer techies. I am really cofused about video card performace.

Please rank these cards in the order of gaming performance from best to worst.

1)Geforce 6100 (integrated)
2)Radeon 9250 128MB
3)Radeon 9600 64MB
4)Radeon 9200SE 128MB
5)Radeon 7000 64MB
6)Radeon X1300 256MB
7)Geforce 7300 GS 256MB
8)Geforce 6200 with TurboCache

Here is what I think and I think I might wrong.
(From best to worst)

Geforce 7300 GS 256MB
Geforce 6200 with TurboCache
Radeon X1300 256MB
Geforce 6100 (integrated)
Radeon 9250 128MB
Radeon 9600 64MB
Radeon 9200SE 128MB
Radeon 7000 64MB

You guys know much more than me, what do you think?
[ + quote]
Advertisement
_ 		__
rcrockett
Member
_ 		24. August 2006 @ 09:31 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Looks good to me, except 7 and 8 on the first list are different than 7 and 8 on the second list so...
[ + quote]
USE FIREFOX
My Profile: http://my.afterdawn.com/rcrockett/
elokito
Senior Member
_ 		24. August 2006 @ 11:42 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
remove the 6200 turbo cache that is one of the worst cards ever created!!! anyways i had a radeon 9550 i played at 1280*1024 2x aa and eveything on low or 1024*768 with everything at med no aa
[ + quote]
[
jaysfan
Member
_ 		24. August 2006 @ 11:45 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
why is the 6200 bad
[ + quote]
elokito
Senior Member
_ 		24. August 2006 @ 11:47 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
no the 6200 isnt bad but the 6200tc is wayyyyy wayyy bad just look for benchmarks i think if u try runin bf2 at 1024*768 with 2 aa ul probably get 5-12fps
[ + quote]
[
Advertisement
_ 		__
 
_
jaysfan
Member
_ 		24. August 2006 @ 12:05 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
hey dude will integrated graphics like the geforce 6100 work? how many fps do you think it will get at 1024 by 768 with aa and all the eye candy turned off.
its hard to come by benchmarks which compare integrated graphics with real graphic solutions.

[ + quote]
afterdawn.com > forums > pc hardware > other pc hardware > low end card plays battlefield 2
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2026 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork