User User name Password  
   
Monday 17.2.2025 / 09:17
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > software, operating systems and more > linux - general discussion > which linux?
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
which linux?
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
orngcrsh
Member
_
29. April 2007 @ 18:26 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I'm looking for a linux distro that is similar to windows (something that wont have a huge learning curve and that will allow me to surf the net, watch movies, listen to music, etc...) AND that boots fast and runs smoothly.
Some cool graphics and effects would be cool too like that "BERYL" i've been reading about.
I'm running a vista notebook with AMD turion 62 X2 tl-52 processor with 1 gig of ram.

And suggestions?
Advertisement
_
__
Senior Member
_
29. April 2007 @ 19:15 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
i would recommend that you use ubuntu. it is the most noob friendly distro.
here is how to install beryl
http://news.softpedia.com/news/Ubuntu-Ed...ryl-44785.shtml
ubuntu is good for beginners but after you learn to use it you should upgrade to something better, like debian. go to the ubuntu website to download a live cd. boot from the cd then when you have the desktop up run the installer. the installer is noob proof. if you want to dual boot edit the partition table manualy and create an ext3 partition for ubuntu. 15 gigs should be good. also a 1 gig swap. and if you want to share files between linux and windows make a fat32 partition. then let it install. hope that helps

GAMING COMPUTER - Intel q9550 @ 3.4ghz | EVGA GTX 260 core 216 | Gigabyte ds3l | 6gb Gskill DDR2 800 ram | Silverstone 700 watt psu | WD 640gb hdd | Seagate 300gb hdd | LG dvd burner | Samsung dvd burner | Antec p182 case | logitech 2.1 speakers | logitech g11 keyboard | Samsung 25.5in 1900x1200 monitor | 19in 1440x900 secondary monitor | Windows 7 64bit | SERVER - Gigabyte 785g motherboard | AMD Phenom 9650 | 6gb ram | three 1.5tb hdd | Seagate 1tb hdd | WD 750gb hdd | two 300gb hdd | Maxtor 200gb hdd | Ark rackmount case | CentOS 5.5
Steam name = "krj15489" alias = Jordan-k
Auslander
AfterDawn Addict
_
29. April 2007 @ 19:26 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
xandros.

/thread. :-)


This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 29. April 2007 @ 19:26

orngcrsh
Member
_
29. April 2007 @ 19:34 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
You said to share files i should create a FAT32 partition? I think my disk is NTFS... will that make a difference? I also heard that ubuntu can be unsafe.. is there any truth to that?

also, would i be better off creating a partition or using a usb HD?

thanks for the advise!!
Senior Member
_
29. April 2007 @ 19:51 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
there are a few security issues, but it is the most noob friendly. if you dont want these security issues go with debian. it is a little harder to setup than ubuntu but it is a great system. in linux you cant write to an ntfs file system without downloading some extra software. you can read the partition but cant write to it. i would create a small partition that is fat32 so you can use the files in vista and linux

GAMING COMPUTER - Intel q9550 @ 3.4ghz | EVGA GTX 260 core 216 | Gigabyte ds3l | 6gb Gskill DDR2 800 ram | Silverstone 700 watt psu | WD 640gb hdd | Seagate 300gb hdd | LG dvd burner | Samsung dvd burner | Antec p182 case | logitech 2.1 speakers | logitech g11 keyboard | Samsung 25.5in 1900x1200 monitor | 19in 1440x900 secondary monitor | Windows 7 64bit | SERVER - Gigabyte 785g motherboard | AMD Phenom 9650 | 6gb ram | three 1.5tb hdd | Seagate 1tb hdd | WD 750gb hdd | two 300gb hdd | Maxtor 200gb hdd | Ark rackmount case | CentOS 5.5
Steam name = "krj15489" alias = Jordan-k
orngcrsh
Member
_
29. April 2007 @ 20:29 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
thanks!
The_Fiend
Suspended permanently
_
29. April 2007 @ 20:50 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
The most newbie friendly would be OpenSuSE and Mandriva.
Ubuntu's just a mess.

irc://arcor.de.eu.dal.net/wasted_hate

Wanna tell me off, go ahead.
I dare ya !
orngcrsh
Member
_
29. April 2007 @ 21:05 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
okay, now i've been looking at mandriva and it looks like you have to pay for it.. is this true? If so, let me clarify, i'm also looking for something that's free since it's just going to be a side project.
The_Fiend
Suspended permanently
_
29. April 2007 @ 21:10 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
No, mandriva itself is free.
http://www.mandriva.com/download
Have a good look on that page.

irc://arcor.de.eu.dal.net/wasted_hate

Wanna tell me off, go ahead.
I dare ya !
orngcrsh
Member
_
29. April 2007 @ 21:23 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by The_Fiend:
No, mandriva itself is free.
http://www.mandriva.com/download
Have a good look on that page.
i'm assuming i need the x86 64 version, not the i586?
i have an AMD turion64 X2 HP notebook
The_Fiend
Suspended permanently
_
29. April 2007 @ 23:36 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
You could use either one, just because a system has X64, doesn't mean you HAVE to use an OS with a 64 bit architecture.

irc://arcor.de.eu.dal.net/wasted_hate

Wanna tell me off, go ahead.
I dare ya !
orngcrsh
Member
_
30. April 2007 @ 07:30 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by The_Fiend:
You could use either one, just because a system has X64, doesn't mean you HAVE to use an OS with a 64 bit architecture.
yeah i know that i have the 32bit OS but I figured that the x86 was what i had... oh well, thanks for the help
orngcrsh
Member
_
30. April 2007 @ 10:54 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Quote:
Originally posted by The_Fiend:
You could use either one, just because a system has X64, doesn't mean you HAVE to use an OS with a 64 bit architecture.
yeah i know that i have the 32bit OS but I figured that the x86 was what i had... oh well, thanks for the help
sorry, just confusion on my part...
Member
_
30. April 2007 @ 15:34 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I would stay w/ i386 to begin with.. just because not everything works in 64 bit (mostly just ads but you can intsall "opera" web browser and get around most of that, but still.. get use to 32 bit first) if you do decide to go with ubuntu, bookmark these pages.. it will keep you from asking stupid questions.. In other words.. this is .T.F.M.

If you install 6.10 - http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu_Edgy

If you install 7.04 - http://ubuntuguide.org/wiki/Ubuntu:Feisty

although you won't hear a lot of support from the "AD" heads on ubuntu.. it is a great OS.. but what makes it the best in my opinion is the community.. which a newb needs in my opinion..

p.s. I know the ubuntu hater tribe gasp everytime they see me mention ubuntu.. but seriously.. It's a real easy system to "get the jist of things" but Jan is right.. "great out of the box" but it's a "pain in the arse to install sh1t on" but I want to point out.. that pain is system specific.. some thing's go great on one ubuntu box and are complete p.i.t.a. on another machines.. anyways.. you will try them all after you fiugure one out.. so for the simple time being.. pick one and run w/ it.. best advice I can give.

Free Grooverider!!!!

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 30. April 2007 @ 15:55

Moderator
_
2. May 2007 @ 12:52 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by orngcrsh:
i have an AMD turion64 X2 HP notebook
- i have an AMD Turion HP (not an X2) and i've been using Mandriva 2006.0 (64bit version) for a long time, it's perfectly stable. I tried 2007.0 64bit on the same laptop but Mandriva have been changing the way Broadcom wifi is handled and i couldn't be doing with messing about when 2006.0 works so well so i went back to 2006.0.
I do use 2007.0 on a few machines (32bit versions) and 2007.1 (32bit) at work also. 2006.0 is so far my favourite of all old & new versions..



Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules ***

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 2. May 2007 @ 12:53

orngcrsh
Member
_
2. May 2007 @ 16:57 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
thanks for all the input!

Will linux work okay if I put in on an external HD? (using USB cable)
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
Amebaid
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
4. May 2007 @ 19:44 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
well i'm not that pro in linux but i first tried kubuntu but some how it was complicated for me then i tried open suse 10.2 which is just perfect so easy so good , and effective
afterdawn.com > forums > software, operating systems and more > linux - general discussion > which linux?
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork