Mobile/PDA About Us Advertise here
User User name Password  
  Not registered yet? Register here.
Lost your password? Click here. 		 
  Home   News   Guides   Downloads   Glossary   Hardware   Profiles   Forums   v4  
 Advertise at AfterDawn.com     Link to us!     Private messages     Compose a private message     List of all updated threads     Threads without replies     Search messages
Tuesday 30.12.2025 / 07:10
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > pc hardware > other pc hardware > processor comparisons.
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
Processor comparisons.
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
core2kid
AfterDawn Addict

23 product reviews
_ 		24. March 2008 @ 13:57 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I always wanted to know which of the Core2Duo laptop processors would be better. I see that there are processors such as the T7200 that are 2GHz, 4MB cache and 667 FSB. Then I see the T7250 that are 2GHz, 2MB cache but 800 FSB. Which would truly be better? I also wanted to know the website that compares processors for you, I remember that there was one.
[ + quote]

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 26. March 2008 @ 07:52
Zer0ink
Member
_ 		26. March 2008 @ 02:01 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
T7250 that are 2GHz, 2MB cache but 800 FSB would be better.

4MB cache and 533 FSB is an over kill for now

i have read:

processors --> T5550 and the T5500 --->T5550 came out after the T5500

all the XX50's did ..a better processor but higher energy consumption and they give off more heat. Laptop batteries and the time they last make using the xx50's less ideal; however, te proformance is better.

L2 Cache---> A cache is a small, higher speed memory system which stores the most recently used instructions or data from a larger but slower memory system. Because programs frequently use a subset of instructions or data repeatedly, the cache is a cost effective method of enhancing the memory system in a "statistical" method, without having to resort to the expense of making ALL of the memory system faster.

http://macspeedzone.com/archive/4.0/UppingCachEmail2.html

I have a AMD 2700+ that has a 256K Cache and that processor still rocks. 2Mb or 4Mb? more is nice but i'd focus at other things like...

FSB---> the size of the door way between the joined area of the mother board and the processor or how much processed information can be given at to the mother board from the processor at once. Abstractly speaking of course.

T7250 that are 2GHz, 2MB cache but 800 FSB would win.

hope this increased your understanding

teach and learn
paul
[ + quote]
core2kid
AfterDawn Addict

23 product reviews
_ 		26. March 2008 @ 07:51 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
1st post edited, it was 667 FSB.
Also thanks for clarifying that. That's probably why the AMD line was killing the Intel line until the release of the Core2's.
[ + quote]

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 26. March 2008 @ 07:54
afterdawn.com > forums > pc hardware > other pc hardware > processor comparisons.
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork