User User name Password  
   
Thursday 28.11.2024 / 00:13
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > software, operating systems and more > windows - games > bioshock pc lagging
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
bioshock pc lagging
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
Page:12Next >
armyman45
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
4. May 2008 @ 18:11 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
ok so i have bioshock on my pc n it wasnt running properly at first so i set it to run an in xp service pack 2 and it runs but its laggy so i turned my graphics as low as possible and its still a lil choppy like ill hold down foward let go and ill still keep goin ofr a sec or two same with all the controlls thier either slightly delayed or keep doing the action after i stop hitting the button

i did the nvidia can my comper play this game thing and it said my computer was a lil bit above the recomended except my sound card which i got the sound working anyways

system specs are

2 processors running - Intel(R) Pentium(R) Dual CPU E2140 @ 1.60GHz
2.0 GB System RAM
Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium Edition, 32-bit (Build 6000)
You Have: NVIDIA GeForce 8300 GS (GeForce 8300 GS)
Video Card Features - Minimum attributes of your Video Card Video RAM: Required - 512 MB , You have - 880.2 MB
Video Card 3D Acceleration: Required - Yes , You have - Yes
Video HW Transform & Lighting: Required - Yes , You have - Yes
Vertex Shader Ver.: Required - 3.0 , You have - 4.0
Pixel Shader Ver.: Required - 3.0 , You have - 4.0


by the way i also run bioshock in the lowest graphics setting to make it load faster and the button lagging still happens
Advertisement
_
__
AfterDawn Addict
_
4. May 2008 @ 23:10 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
unless you're overclocking your e2140, performance isn't gonna be good for gaming. most people would overclock the e2140 to at least 3ghz, because it's cheap and has overclock potential.

also the 8300GS is not a gaming card. you would at least need a 8600GTS 512 or ATi HD3850 512 to get stable gameplay.

ps2: v7 scph-39001 - independence exploit - hdloader 0.8c - maxtor 300gb hdd
(+[__]%) psp slim ta-085v1: 6.60 PRO B10
wii (powered by bootmii/priiloader): 4.1u - d2x v10beta53-alt (base 56) - configurable usb loader v70r51/devolution r188 - wd scorpio black 7200rpm 320gig w/ ams venus ds2 enclosure

got a whole lot more to list . . .
armyman45
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
5. May 2008 @ 15:13 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by cee43ja1:
unless you're overclocking your e2140, performance isn't gonna be good for gaming. most people would overclock the e2140 to at least 3ghz, because it's cheap and has overclock potential.

also the 8300GS is not a gaming card. you would at least need a 8600GTS 512 or ATi HD3850 512 to get stable gameplay.
first of all i dont use many tech terms so overclocking would be? and the nvidia site said my card as long as its got the new drivers is slightly above the recomended, and yes i did update all drivers n such on my comp
armyman45
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
5. May 2008 @ 20:28 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
ok i did some deffinition searching on overclocking do can anyone link me to another forum topic or site that could help me learn how to overclock my pc
(still continuing the bioshock problems though)
AfterDawn Addict
_
6. May 2008 @ 13:36 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Yes, the processor is pretty bad, but that's not the root of your problem, it's your graphics card that is majorly affecting performance. The 8300 is (As far as i can remember) not actually available for the public to buy, only manufacturers, this is due to it being placed in only very low end PCs. As cee43ja1 said, you should be looking at upgrading your graphics card - his suggestions are good if you don't want to have to spend that much on gaming.

About overclocking your CPU:

Overclocking a CPU involves going into your BIOS and changing certain values. Overclock by too much and apart from your computer freezing or shutting down, you could harm the components. If you want to overclock, read up on it for a few hours or something, just so you know for sure what you're doing.



PSP, all the way from 1.00 to 5.50 GEN D2 - DS Lite w/ M3DS Real (M3 Sakura v1.34)
PS3 3.01 - iPod Touch 2G 16GB Jailbroken - Xbox 360 60GB - PC, Q6600, 3GB DDR2, GTX260 (216) 896MB
armyman45
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
7. May 2008 @ 18:21 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
oh yes i forgot to add one more thing my computer can run crysis at medium graphics and not lag at all i run bioshock at lowest possible everything and its laggy if crysis supposed to be the more advanced than how come bioshock lags (i ussually run most of my games in lowest settings anyway to provide quicker load times)
AfterDawn Addict
_
7. May 2008 @ 18:33 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Whoa steady on...

An 8400 (which is better than your graphics card (or at least the one you listed)) honestly struggles running Crysis above minimum settings at a good resolution.



PSP, all the way from 1.00 to 5.50 GEN D2 - DS Lite w/ M3DS Real (M3 Sakura v1.34)
PS3 3.01 - iPod Touch 2G 16GB Jailbroken - Xbox 360 60GB - PC, Q6600, 3GB DDR2, GTX260 (216) 896MB
armyman45
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
7. May 2008 @ 20:34 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
yep i got mine to run medium-low on (800-600 res though) not full res. but it still didnt lag at all so that could be why i did get it to run pretty good at other higher res. but i just stuck with that one for ultra smoothness and loading times n junk

EDT. ok i just did some screen tests with crysis i can get it to run 1024-768 res on low with minimal lag i can run 800-600 on flat medium and get a lil more lag but i ussually run it low with some medium

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 7. May 2008 @ 20:43

AfterDawn Addict
_
8. May 2008 @ 00:09 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
bioshock is probably more cpu intensive. eventhough you have dual core e2140, it's not fast enough for gaming. you at least want 2.5ghz for gaming.

slightly above the recommendation is just for getting playable rates. it's not going to be guaranteed to be smooth.

ps2: v7 scph-39001 - independence exploit - hdloader 0.8c - maxtor 300gb hdd
(+[__]%) psp slim ta-085v1: 6.60 PRO B10
wii (powered by bootmii/priiloader): 4.1u - d2x v10beta53-alt (base 56) - configurable usb loader v70r51/devolution r188 - wd scorpio black 7200rpm 320gig w/ ams venus ds2 enclosure

got a whole lot more to list . . .
AfterDawn Addict
_
8. May 2008 @ 06:51 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Another thing to note - You most likely don't actually meet recommended specs.

Your dedicated video memory registers as 880.2MB, this figure is wrong, srtest (I presume you used that?) doesn't always measure the dedicated memory only (Usually only on the lower end cards). The 8300GS truly only has 128MB of dedicated memory, this is the minimum for the game to run, the same with Crysis. This is very important, you should have 256MB of dedicated memory at least to run new games at a reasonable resolution and with textures looking nice.



PSP, all the way from 1.00 to 5.50 GEN D2 - DS Lite w/ M3DS Real (M3 Sakura v1.34)
PS3 3.01 - iPod Touch 2G 16GB Jailbroken - Xbox 360 60GB - PC, Q6600, 3GB DDR2, GTX260 (216) 896MB
armyman45
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
8. May 2008 @ 18:43 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by Shokz:
Another thing to note - You most likely don't actually meet recommended specs.

Your dedicated video memory registers as 880.2MB, this figure is wrong, srtest (I presume you used that?) doesn't always measure the dedicated memory only (Usually only on the lower end cards). The 8300GS truly only has 128MB of dedicated memory, this is the minimum for the game to run, the same with Crysis. This is very important, you should have 256MB of dedicated memory at least to run new games at a reasonable resolution and with textures looking nice.
the nvidia site said my card has 880 my system info says 512 either way i said i CAN run crysis im having absolutely no problems with that no matter what the statistics say crysis run great its bioshock thats the problemo
AfterDawn Addict
_
8. May 2008 @ 18:49 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
If i'm looking things up right, i understand it as thus;

The card has 128MB RAM, supporting up to 512MB with Turbocache (which is what windows notices). As i said before, 128MB is the minimum for the games to run, you should be looking to get a better graphics card. The best option would be to get both a new CPU and graphics card, but if you can only afford one, go with a new graphics card.



PSP, all the way from 1.00 to 5.50 GEN D2 - DS Lite w/ M3DS Real (M3 Sakura v1.34)
PS3 3.01 - iPod Touch 2G 16GB Jailbroken - Xbox 360 60GB - PC, Q6600, 3GB DDR2, GTX260 (216) 896MB
armyman45
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
8. May 2008 @ 19:48 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by Shokz:
If i'm looking things up right, i understand it as thus;

The card has 128MB RAM, supporting up to 512MB with Turbocache (which is what windows notices). As i said before, 128MB is the minimum for the games to run, you should be looking to get a better graphics card. The best option would be to get both a new CPU and graphics card, but if you can only afford one, go with a new graphics card.
duely noted is there anything else i can do to my pc other than buying new equipment im getting a new comp next fall anyway but im talkin just for now so i can run bioshock a lil better
AfterDawn Addict
_
8. May 2008 @ 19:58 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
NEXT Autumn? That's a while to wait with your 8300GS, before then, games will really start to lag, even at minimum, if you really have to wait, drop into the market for a new PC when the GeForce 10 series come out (Whenever that will be, though surely before Q3 '09). Or you could wait for the prices of the 9800GTX to drop, i'm willing to bet that by the start of next year they'll be around £130 (In the USA i'd guess at just over $200 'cos computer components are cheaper over there). With that kind of card you'd be set up for the next few years.



PSP, all the way from 1.00 to 5.50 GEN D2 - DS Lite w/ M3DS Real (M3 Sakura v1.34)
PS3 3.01 - iPod Touch 2G 16GB Jailbroken - Xbox 360 60GB - PC, Q6600, 3GB DDR2, GTX260 (216) 896MB

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 8. May 2008 @ 19:59

armyman45
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
9. May 2008 @ 21:06 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by Shokz:
NEXT Autumn? That's a while to wait with your 8300GS, before then, games will really start to lag, even at minimum, if you really have to wait, drop into the market for a new PC when the GeForce 10 series come out (Whenever that will be, though surely before Q3 '09). Or you could wait for the prices of the 9800GTX to drop, i'm willing to bet that by the start of next year they'll be around £130 (In the USA i'd guess at just over $200 'cos computer components are cheaper over there). With that kind of card you'd be set up for the next few years.
well im not HUGE into pc gaming theres just some games id rather have on the pc so im not goin for anything too expensive i got a 360 bioshock and crysis were gifts so thats whay i was trying so hard to get em to work however i do intend to get a rlly good card (when i get around to it)
Emarosa
Newbie
_
13. June 2008 @ 00:16 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I know this is an old thread, but I am also having the same problem and I'm wondering if my processor can handle Bioshock. It is a amd athlon 64 x2 dual core processor 5600+ 2.80 GHZ. If that isn't it, I'm not sure what the problem is... Any help would be appreciated.
To the OP, sorry for jacking your original thread, just figured that I wouldn't create a new thread for the same problem...
AfterDawn Addict
_
13. June 2008 @ 00:36 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
the x2 5600 should be fine, since the minimum processor required is a 2.4 pentium 4.

most likely your graphics card is not up to it.

ps2: v7 scph-39001 - independence exploit - hdloader 0.8c - maxtor 300gb hdd
(+[__]%) psp slim ta-085v1: 6.60 PRO B10
wii (powered by bootmii/priiloader): 4.1u - d2x v10beta53-alt (base 56) - configurable usb loader v70r51/devolution r188 - wd scorpio black 7200rpm 320gig w/ ams venus ds2 enclosure

got a whole lot more to list . . .
Emarosa
Newbie
_
13. June 2008 @ 00:37 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
How do I check that out?
AfterDawn Addict
_
13. June 2008 @ 00:48 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
do you have a graphics card installed? or are you using the onboard graphics?

go HERE and choose bioshock from the list. it'll tell you if your system can run it.

ps2: v7 scph-39001 - independence exploit - hdloader 0.8c - maxtor 300gb hdd
(+[__]%) psp slim ta-085v1: 6.60 PRO B10
wii (powered by bootmii/priiloader): 4.1u - d2x v10beta53-alt (base 56) - configurable usb loader v70r51/devolution r188 - wd scorpio black 7200rpm 320gig w/ ams venus ds2 enclosure

got a whole lot more to list . . .
Emarosa
Newbie
_
13. June 2008 @ 00:51 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Alright so everything else passed except for the video card. What is my best option? I'm looking for something cheap, quick and easy, especially since I don't do very much PC gaming. None, in fact. Bioshock is the first game I've bought, so its kind of depressing that I can't play it.
AfterDawn Addict
_
13. June 2008 @ 00:55 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
getting a graphics card for a prebuilt is not cheap. when you upgrade, you'll need a new power supply. and it depends on what slot your motherboard uses.

what is the model of your computer?

ps2: v7 scph-39001 - independence exploit - hdloader 0.8c - maxtor 300gb hdd
(+[__]%) psp slim ta-085v1: 6.60 PRO B10
wii (powered by bootmii/priiloader): 4.1u - d2x v10beta53-alt (base 56) - configurable usb loader v70r51/devolution r188 - wd scorpio black 7200rpm 320gig w/ ams venus ds2 enclosure

got a whole lot more to list . . .
Emarosa
Newbie
_
13. June 2008 @ 00:57 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Its an HP m8100n.
AfterDawn Addict
_
13. June 2008 @ 01:07 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
THIS power supply, and THIS graphics card will do. everything totals to about $220, but the power supply has a $10 rebate.

ps2: v7 scph-39001 - independence exploit - hdloader 0.8c - maxtor 300gb hdd
(+[__]%) psp slim ta-085v1: 6.60 PRO B10
wii (powered by bootmii/priiloader): 4.1u - d2x v10beta53-alt (base 56) - configurable usb loader v70r51/devolution r188 - wd scorpio black 7200rpm 320gig w/ ams venus ds2 enclosure

got a whole lot more to list . . .
daacekin
Member

3 product reviews
_
13. June 2008 @ 08:20 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
just had a quick read. lagging of game graphics means make sure you have the latest graphic drivers installed i know from personal experiance that ingame movies can lag and some games won't even start unless these drivers are updated. perchance, the actual gameplay graphics could also be affected. i hope this helps

EDIT: the options within the game are also VERY important! there can be one option which can cause this problem whether it is on or off. i suggest whatever is off, turn it on. and whatever is on, turn it off. basically do the exact opposite of the graphics options configuration. and if it helps, you can change the options bit by bit to your liking and pin point the option of error from experience i had big problem with a graphic option which was set to low in one game (need for speed) and had a major problem for something else because i turned one of the options up even though there was no performance hit (tomb raider).

for nfs it was reflection update rate

for tomb raider it was anti-aliaing. you may want to test these options before inverting your graphic options

by the way, nice specs!!!!! i'm really impressed!!! i thought you could only get pixel shader 3!!!

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. June 2008 @ 08:30

Advertisement
_
__
 
_
Emarosa
Newbie
_
14. June 2008 @ 00:49 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Is there anyway to upgrade the video card's ram without having to buy a new video card? Or is a video card stuck with its ram no matter what? (sorry for the dumb questions, I just don't know much at all about hardware)
 
Page:12Next >
afterdawn.com > forums > software, operating systems and more > windows - games > bioshock pc lagging
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2024 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork