User User name Password  
   
Tuesday 4.3.2025 / 07:18
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > pc hardware > other pc hardware > where is my bottle neck going to be with external hdd connection?
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
Where is my bottle neck going to be with external HDD connection?
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
mgray69
Junior Member
_
19. October 2008 @ 01:56 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
see here for background on this topic - http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/706142

I'm in a market for an extra HDD, either external, or enclosure. I'm Just trying to find where my most restrictive bottleneck is going to be on my various systems. I'm also leaning towards an internal drive, in an enclosure....not sure why, but that seems to be the way the people who know their shiza do it.

Basically all my computers have USB 2.0, as well as Firewire 400. So right there, I think I've found my most restrictive bottle neck, right?

Where I'm confused is whether IDE, ATA, or (e)SATA, SCSI is really going to make a difference, if all that info has to come thru a USB 2.0, or Firewire 400 connection? What should I go with?

Thanks

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 19. October 2008 @ 13:12

Advertisement
_
__
Senior Member
_
19. October 2008 @ 12:49 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
i would go with an internal drive if you don't need the data to be portable. internal drives are also cheaper bigger and faster.

GAMING COMPUTER - Intel q9550 @ 3.4ghz | EVGA GTX 260 core 216 | Gigabyte ds3l | 6gb Gskill DDR2 800 ram | Silverstone 700 watt psu | WD 640gb hdd | Seagate 300gb hdd | LG dvd burner | Samsung dvd burner | Antec p182 case | logitech 2.1 speakers | logitech g11 keyboard | Samsung 25.5in 1900x1200 monitor | 19in 1440x900 secondary monitor | Windows 7 64bit | SERVER - Gigabyte 785g motherboard | AMD Phenom 9650 | 6gb ram | three 1.5tb hdd | Seagate 1tb hdd | WD 750gb hdd | two 300gb hdd | Maxtor 200gb hdd | Ark rackmount case | CentOS 5.5
Steam name = "krj15489" alias = Jordan-k
jony218
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
19. October 2008 @ 18:20 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I use usb 2.0 and it is almost as fast as an internal drive. If there is a difference between an internal and an external drive, it would be in seconds (not minutes). You do notice a minor difference if the drives on the external enclosure are sata instead of ide but it's very minor (it just feels like the sata drives are faster).

I transfer vast amounts of data (about 200gb) at a time from internal to external, it takes over an hour whether I transfer from internal to internal or internal to external. So saving 5 or 10 minutes won't be a big deal.

It's also a good idea to have a specific program that can continue the transfer if a file is corrupted. For instance I use "beyond compare" to transfer folders from one hard drive to another. If there is a file in "drive A" that is corrupted or flagged by the antivirus as suspect windows explorer will stop the the transfer. The program beyond compare will simply skip that file and keep transfering all the rest of the files till it's complete.

In my transfers thats the only bottleneck, a "problem file" stopping everything in mid transfer.

Also always connect your external drives to the rear USB ports, the USB ports in the front of the case sometimes don't give you the whole 2.0 speed.
mgray69
Junior Member
_
19. October 2008 @ 18:27 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Ok good info thanks.

But I do need it to be somewhat portable, and I think I want to put an internal drive in an enclosure. So I just don't know if IDE or SATA is going to make a difference, if it all has to go thru USB anyways.
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
AfterDawn Addict
_
19. October 2008 @ 22:25 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by mgray69:
Ok good info thanks.

But I do need it to be somewhat portable, and I think I want to put an internal drive in an enclosure. So I just don't know if IDE or SATA is going to make a difference, if it all has to go thru USB anyways.
I have my internal SATA drive, in an external enclosure, connected via firewire 400, and it seems to transfer faster than if I connect it via a USB2 port, on the back of my computer.

Edited for spelling error. $@*&% keyboard. :)

Life is good!
GrandpaBruce - Vietnam Vet - 1970 - 1971
Computer: Intel Core i7-920 Nehalim;Asus P6T Deluxe V2

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 19. October 2008 @ 22:26

afterdawn.com > forums > pc hardware > other pc hardware > where is my bottle neck going to be with external hdd connection?
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork