|
Intel Core 2 Duo E6850 / 3 GHz ( 1333 MHz )
|
|
|
ps3lvanub
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
5. March 2009 @ 04:46 |
Link to this message
|
Is this processor suitable for decent end gaming? I am looking to play games like Crysis on Decent graphics on a 40 fps and games like Oblivion and COD 4 and WAW on High settings (Not maximum) with about 40 fps in high octane situations and 50-60fps in calm situations if you know what I mean. Already set on a graphics card it's a Sapphire RADEON HD 4650, and its got 1GB of memory. Opinions much appreciated on the card as well. Also just out of interest what can the processor overclock to and is it worth it? Please do not point me to more expensive processors as I can not go above £190.
Input much appreciated
James W
IMPORTANT: If you hate Sony for being so corrupt, copy this image into your signature too! |
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Moderator
|
5. March 2009 @ 10:07 |
Link to this message
|
|
Thread teleported for you
Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules *** |
|
ps3lvanub
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
5. March 2009 @ 15:32 |
Link to this message
|
IMPORTANT: If you hate Sony for being so corrupt, copy this image into your signature too!
|
|
dragnandy
Senior Member
|
5. March 2009 @ 23:39 |
Link to this message
|
the processor should be fine, but the video card is what would be holding u back. what resolution are you gaming at? the HD4650 isnt the best for gaming, but you can get highest detail with low enough resolution and no AA.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
6. March 2009 @ 00:21 |
Link to this message
|
The CPU is alright, it won't run Crysis at max at 40fps, but that's kind of irrelevant, as that takes a very powerful graphics card anyway. The HD4650 is very weak for maxing out games, it's more designed as a basic home HD video / light gaming card.
You can keep the CPU and get one of these to improve your games performance. Just what performance you'll get depends on the screen resolution you use, and therefore your monitor size.
http://www.scan.co.uk/Products/512MB-Sap...DVI-I-HDTV-HDCP
|
|
ps3lvanub
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
6. March 2009 @ 05:36 |
Link to this message
|
Thanks for all the input guys, It has really given me food for thought. Also are Quad core processors good for gaming? The only reason I'm thinking about a new processor is because I went to the local PC hardware store and I said I had the Processor:
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU @ 2.40GHz, 2400 Mhz, 4 Core(s), 4 Logical Processor(s).
Anyway he said that I needed a single core or dual core for gaming. But when I see how my PC performs on games I'm starting to think he was bs'ing. So what would be better for gaming? The dual core I specified or the processor I have in be more than suitable? Because if I don't have to buy a processor I can go psycho on a GFX card. <Now I like that!
Thanks,
James W.
PS. I think I'll be using my 21in HD Ready TV, Or my 19in TFT monitor.
IMPORTANT: If you hate Sony for being so corrupt, copy this image into your signature too!
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. March 2009 @ 06:10
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
6. March 2009 @ 08:10 |
Link to this message
|
|
Your PC underperforms in games due to the dire graphics card. While your CPU isn't the best, a 2.4Ghz Quad core won't make things any better. You would need a 2.8Ghz one to see a noticeable improvement, and even then, only if you had a very powerful graphics card as well.
|
|
ps3lvanub
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
6. March 2009 @ 08:23 |
Link to this message
|
Ha, ha, I think you misunderstood me. I have the quad core and I was looking at the dual core to buy because some guy in a PC shop told me to. What I was asking was should I stick with the processor I have (Quad core) or buy the processor stated in the title of the thread? Because like I said if I don't have to get a new processor I can get this.
http://www.amazon.co.uk/BFG-NVIDIA%C2%AE...36335519&sr=1-1
IMPORTANT: If you hate Sony for being so corrupt, copy this image into your signature too!
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
6. March 2009 @ 14:43 |
Link to this message
|
Ok, the reason I thought you had the E6850 is that it's a really old CPU, I didn't even think they sold it any more. In any case, there is no reason to downgrade from a Quad core to a dual core for games, certainly not in this case. If it was a Phenom you had, maybe I'd say different.
That graphics card is also very out of date. The HD4870 I posted you will match it, even beat it in a large number of games, and use half as much power in the process.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. March 2009 @ 14:44
|
|
ps3lvanub
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
6. March 2009 @ 17:57 |
Link to this message
|
|
Just found out I have to wait till later on in the year to get my goodies so for the time being I'm turning to overclocking.
Thanks,
James.
IMPORTANT: If you hate Sony for being so corrupt, copy this image into your signature too!
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
6. March 2009 @ 18:24 |
Link to this message
|
|
Seriously, you won't see an ounce of difference in your gaming performance unless you get a better graphics card. The CPU is not what's holding you back right now at all.
|
