|
Clonedvd2 twice as fast
|
|
Member
|
9. July 2006 @ 13:06 |
Link to this message
|
How come Slysoft's Clonedvd2 is twice as fast as DVD Shrink? It seems that Clonedvd2 takes half the time of DVD Shrink. Guess you get what you pay for or don't pay for.
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
Member
|
9. July 2006 @ 13:16 |
Link to this message
|
well it has a lot to do with your computer setup
hard drive, size of ram, processor, ect
just got a new computer, its a great deal faster
than the old one..it usually takes about 25 min
total for encode/shrink/backup/burn on most movies.
CloneDvD2 along with AnyDVD is about the best combo
out there in my opinion............
DVD Shrink is no longer updated, but still works great
with AnyDVD
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9. July 2006 @ 13:27
|
|
pazzini
Suspended permanently
|
9. July 2006 @ 13:17 |
Link to this message
|
CloneDVD is faster but it comes at a cost, picture quality suffers!
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
9. July 2006 @ 13:37 |
Link to this message
|
|
The picture quality with my CloneDvd2 is excellent!
Gif by Phantom69
 |
|
pazzini
Suspended permanently
|
9. July 2006 @ 14:19 |
Link to this message
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
9. July 2006 @ 14:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
yep, and?
Gif by Phantom69
|
|
pazzini
Suspended permanently
|
9. July 2006 @ 14:32 |
Link to this message
|
|
Clonedvd's quality is only good at a compression level of up to 15-20% anything above that you start noticing artifacts, like noise, blockiness, etc..etc.. As where Shrink and Recode2 can go alot higher without these artifacts.
|
Senior Member
|
9. July 2006 @ 14:35 |
Link to this message
|
^^ I agree. I guess it all boils down to everyone's individual eyes but according to mine, CloneDVD provides a hell of a lot more pixelation than Shrink does.
Latest AnyDVD to rip > VOBB to blank the unwanted on a DVD > Shrink to compress > ImgBurn to burn = Never starting a thread asking how to backup a movie
|
|
sammychan
Junior Member
|
9. July 2006 @ 22:12 |
Link to this message
|
Yeah I heard DVD Shrink has better picture quality than CloneDVD2 and it's logical to think that way because Shrink takes so much longer to clone a DVD but I find in practice when I actually clone a DVD with either software, both are excellent. I don't see any difference in the results.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
9. July 2006 @ 23:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
I can't see much, if any difference, then again I find that CloneDvd2 isn't much quicker than shrink...
Gif by Phantom69
|
|
movies27
Senior Member
|
11. July 2006 @ 02:01 |
Link to this message
|
|
I noticed no difference really but i used to use shrink but clonedvd2 is better & faster in my opinion
|
|
Ausguy
Newbie
|
11. July 2006 @ 03:22 |
Link to this message
|
Hmmm CloneDVD is twice as fast and half as good as shrink
you certanly do get what you pay for LOL
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
11. July 2006 @ 13:27 |
Link to this message
|
Quote;
"Hmmm CloneDVD is twice as fast and half as good as shrink
you certanly do get what you pay for LOL"
I think that is a tad unfair, in my experience CloneDvd2 is NOT twice as fast as Shrink & Shrink is certainly not twice as good, if it is better at all.
All these are, of course, a matter of opinion & sweeping statements like the above don't really contribute to the debate in a constructive manner.
Gif by Phantom69
|
