|
Bad porting jobs undermining the ps3?
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
13. July 2007 @ 21:15 |
Link to this message
|
i've said this for so long, and now one of the guys running it says the same thing. if i saw it, im glad he did. the ports from the 360 dont looks as good because the ps3 has a slight graphics edge. on top of that, the ports are reduced in quality for that they can get higher framerates without rewriting much code. its lazy on the devs term and makes people ashamed of the ps3.
http://www.pspsps.tv/2007/07/e3_2007_bad_ports_are_undermin.html
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
Junior Member
|
13. July 2007 @ 21:33 |
Link to this message
|
yea...splinter cell double agent was horrible...luckily ubisoft kinda redeemed themselves with Vegas...but even Vegas is still kinda messed up...
...I Hate You...
|
|
nax0101
Member
|
14. July 2007 @ 03:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
ye its tru it is very dissapointing, but not to worry, as soon as the games like kill zone come out, we will be seein the tru beauti of the whole thing
the trailer is in game footage and it looks amense
|
Moderator
16 product reviews
|
14. July 2007 @ 05:38 |
Link to this message
|
|
I have been saying that for a LONG time, which is why I don't support those dev's when they come out with crappy ports....
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
14. July 2007 @ 09:19 |
Link to this message
|
hopefully sony can pull things off, and hopefully heresay people believe about the ps3 will change before it becomes "fact". its hard to change opinions about something after 2 years.
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 14. July 2007 @ 09:20
|
|
ooZEROoo
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
14. July 2007 @ 20:21 |
Link to this message
|
once again ubisoft is brought up They thrash ps3s theyre probably on bill gates u know what as we speak. Most of sonys good exclusives past and present were made by sony. Porting is not the problem its fanboy based companies crapping all over ps3 like ubisoft. These companies forget who made them into who they are. Lets say for instance without playstation where would rainbow 6 and ghost recon be right now. If it wasnt for vegas and assassins creed and splinter cell who would play an ubisoft game u should be thrashing urselves ubisoft for doing a crappy job and not the ps3 for a high price tag. Socom is way better than ghost recon anyway.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 16. July 2007 @ 13:02
|
Senior Member
|
16. July 2007 @ 12:32 |
Link to this message
|
Wow.....please edit that and use some punctuation. That is way too hard to try and read.
~Rich
|
|
ooZEROoo
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
16. July 2007 @ 12:42 |
Link to this message
|
|
sorry hopefully thats a lil better
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 16. July 2007 @ 12:59
|
Member
|
16. July 2007 @ 17:18 |
Link to this message
|
|
Give developers time. Theyve worked with the 360 for quite some time now and know the hardware, while the ps3 is still relativley new. Once they get a hold of it and gain better insight into the ps3's innards, im sure that games will surpass that of 360.
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
17. July 2007 @ 15:17 |
Link to this message
|
|
its not so much they dont know how, its that they are lazy and cheap with the porting process. so if its made for 360, they reduce its graphics to compensate for blocky unaltered code from another console.
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
|
17. July 2007 @ 15:23 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by ooZEROoo:
once again ubisoft is brought up They thrash ps3s theyre probably on bill gates u know what as we speak. Most of sonys good exclusives past and present were made by sony. Porting is not the problem its fanboy based companies crapping all over ps3 like ubisoft. These companies forget who made them into who they are. Lets say for instance without playstation where would rainbow 6 and ghost recon be right now. If it wasnt for vegas and assassins creed and splinter cell who would play an ubisoft game u should be thrashing urselves ubisoft for doing a crappy job and not the ps3 for a high price tag. Socom is way better than ghost recon anyway.
i just saw this, and i have to agree to an extenxt. im sure quite a few companies are composed of people who favor one console, and would love to make people believe the other is worse. i bet many companies have to be under secret pay to reduce a competing product, but under thhe veil of an "assistance" or "contribution".
But they all do sort of the same thing, and that is rearrange what you thought was real, and they remind you of the beauty of very simple things. You forget, because youre so busy going from a to z, that theres 24 letters in between... You turn on... tune in... and you drop out...
PS3 Username: Anubis66
|
