3.71 m33 cfw
|
|
medamac
Junior Member
|
28. September 2007 @ 18:21 |
Link to this message
|
does anyone recommend for me to upgrade my cfw rite now (3.52 m33-4) to 3.71 m33 or to wait for it to come out with the 1.50 kernel with the 3.71 m33 and also wen i tried to upgrade to 3.71 m33 it says your cfw neeeds to be 3.52 m33 or higher AND MY cfw is 3.52 m33-4 WHAT DO U THINK IS WRONG?
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
29. September 2007 @ 11:29 |
Link to this message
|
There has been a lot of trouble with 3.71 M33 lately. Wait until maybe a patch comes out for it like 3.71 M33-1. I bricked while upgrading to 3.71 M33.
|
Senior Member
|
29. September 2007 @ 16:17 |
Link to this message
|
Who's going to patch the firmware if Dark_aleX is leaving?
@Medamac
I wouldn't upgrade to 3.71 yet because it doesn't support 1.50 kernal on neither the fat nor the slim. I'd just wait until he releases the next version (which may be a patch called 3.71 M33-1).
If you're still adamant about upgrading, though, I suggest going back to 1.50 and then upgrading to 3.71 M33.
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
29. September 2007 @ 16:22 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by XEnigmaX: Who's going to patch the firmware if Dark_aleX is leaving?
@Medamac
I wouldn't upgrade to 3.71 yet because it doesn't support 1.50 kernal on neither the fat nor the slim. I'd just wait until he releases the next version (which may be a patch called 3.71 M33-1).
If you're still adamant about upgrading, though, I suggest going back to 1.50 and then upgrading to 3.71 M33.
By what you're saying, if he left then how can he release the 1.50 kernel patch? Think!
He didn't leave just yet because he stall has to release the 1.50 kernel patch and the PSPFAT & SLIM UNBRICKER. Maybe he'll also decide to release a patch to fix teh bugs on 3.71 M33.
|
Senior Member
|
29. September 2007 @ 16:29 |
Link to this message
|
"By what I'm saying"... is that he
Originally posted by XEnigmaX: is leaving
I think quite often, thank you. Read!
BTW... the unbricker is already out.
http://pspupdates.qj.net/-UPDATE-Dark-Al...g/49/aid/103563
I wasn't insulting your masculinity or anything when I not so bluntly stated that there most likely won't be a 3.71 M33-1--DaX himself said that he would only release three more things before leaving, and two of those things are already out. After he releases 1.50 kernal, I'm suspecting that he'll be gone for good this time, so we'll have to wait for some other homebrew coders to pick up the slack on cfws.
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
29. September 2007 @ 16:34 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by XEnigmaX: he is leaving
Oh, it takes one week for someone to just get up and stop working. You read.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 29. September 2007 @ 16:36
|
Senior Member
|
29. September 2007 @ 16:53 |
Link to this message
|
Maybe I should make myself as clear as possible:
We can agree that DaX said he was going to leave after releasing the following:
1 - 3.71 M33 (Check)[/]
2 - PSP Unbricker (Check)[/]
3 - 1.50 Kernal (Not Check)[ ]
On this list, it doesn't mention patches for 3.71 M33, so it's obviously not a priority of his.
I'm not quite sure what you are getting at with:
Originally posted by btfan: Oh, it takes one week for someone to just get up and stop working. You read.
or what that even means. Also, I'm a little confused as to why you started arguing with me in the first place. All I said was that Dark_Alex is going to leave soon, which I'm sure you can agree with.
Please, understand that I wasn't insulting you or attempting to make you play the part of village idiot by letting you know that Dark_AleX would most likely not release any patches. He might, he might not--but he's made no hinting towards the fact either way.
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
29. September 2007 @ 17:02 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by XEnigmaX: Maybe I should make myself as clear as possible:
We can agree that DaX said he was going to leave after releasing the following:
1 - 3.71 M33 (Check)[/]
2 - PSP Unbricker (Check)[/]
3 - 1.50 Kernal (Not Check)[ ]
On this list, it doesn't mention patches for 3.71 M33, so it's obviously not a priority of his.
I'm not quite sure what you are getting at with:
Originally posted by btfan: Oh, it takes one week for someone to just get up and stop working. You read.
or what that even means. Also, I'm a little confused as to why you started arguing with me in the first place. All I said was that Dark_Alex is going to leave soon, which I'm sure you can agree with.
Please, understand that I wasn't insulting you or attempting to make you play the part of village idiot by letting you know that Dark_AleX would most likely not release any patches. He might, he might not--but he's made no hinting towards the fact either way.
Yes. You are right. I agree with you. Sorry for my rude comments.
What I meant is that if Dark_AleX see's that there are too many bricks with 3.71 M33, he might make a patch to fix the bugs. For example, when he released Pandora's Battery, he didn't state that a new unbricker will be released until 3.71 M33 got released which is a long time after Pandora's Battery's release. Maybe he'll add "Make a patch for 3.71 M33" in his To Do List.
Sorry for before, peace, dude!
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 29. September 2007 @ 17:05
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
4. October 2007 @ 15:15 |
Link to this message
|
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
11. October 2007 @ 14:30 |
Link to this message
|
Wow, no answer in 7 days, someone got dissed! :P
|
Senior Member
|
11. October 2007 @ 17:32 |
Link to this message
|
I believe that I did answer you in your PM that said the exact same thing, I just didn't want to humiliate you on the public forums.
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
11. October 2007 @ 17:33 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by XEnigmaX: I believe that I did answer you in your PM that said the exact same thing, I just didn't want to humiliate you on the public forums.
You mean the YouTube picture? You call that humiliation?
You also said on the PM that you were wrong.
Correction: you didn't want to humiliate YOURSELF.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 11. October 2007 @ 17:33
|
Senior Member
|
11. October 2007 @ 18:27 |
Link to this message
|
[EDIT: After reading through my post, I've decided to retract what I said--not because of btfan's response below, but because I've read over it and decided that I sounded like a jerk. Yesterday, for reasons between me and myself, was a poor day for me and I reacted differently than I normally would have in this situation. The original post is below in the quote box, I'll keep it for sake of just keeping it...]
Originally posted by xEnigmaX: Lol, it wasn't the picture that was supposed to humiliate you... it was the way you responded. I'm not going to get into it because it's not worth it--some of us here have enough pride not to respond to childish fight instigations from a twelve year old that films his cat in his spare time.
I suggest that you get over this; me thinking that we settled everything with the private messages was obviously me giving you too much credit.
[EDIT(cont...): Now, @btfan: I thought the dispute was settled; you even said so yourself:
Originally posted by btfan: You also said on the PM that you were wrong.
,which I did do, so I don't quite understand why you pushed the matter even further on this page. I was man enough to suck up my pride and not be a sore loser--I suggest you suck up yours and not be "that kid" who continues to beat a dead horse with a rotting log.]
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. October 2007 @ 07:24
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
11. October 2007 @ 18:29 |
Link to this message
|
You were wrong since the beginning by saying "Dark alex is leaving" because he announced that he will continue releasing updates but less frequently.
wrong again.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 16. December 2007 @ 17:45
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
12. October 2007 @ 13:13 |
Link to this message
|
No answer again!
|
Senior Member
|
13. October 2007 @ 08:20 |
Link to this message
|
Did you even read my edited post?
To any mods reading, I request this thread be closed.
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
Moderator
|
13. October 2007 @ 15:56 |
Link to this message
|
Yeah I think this one has went waaaay off course. Closed.
@btfan
Watch the double posts
|