Mobile/PDA About Us Advertise here
User User name Password  
  Not registered yet? Register here.
Lost your password? Click here. 		 
  Home   News   Guides   Downloads   Glossary   Hardware   Profiles   Forums   v4  
 Advertise at AfterDawn.com     Link to us!     Private messages     Compose a private message     List of all updated threads     Threads without replies     Search messages
Friday 22.8.2025 / 16:28
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > consoles > sony psp - general discussion > slim or fat
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
slim or fat
  Jump to:
 
Posted Message
papampam
Junior Member
_ 		4. October 2007 @ 23:47 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
iam planing to buy a psp slim

but i have a psp fat 3.52 M33-4

what is the diff. between this two

can yougive me an idea ??

thanks
[ + quote]
cee43ja1
AfterDawn Addict
_ 		5. October 2007 @ 00:04 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
i have both fat and slim, and there's not much of a difference. wherever one falls short on, the other has it. slow umd playing on fat, slim runs faster by caching into memory. slim can't run many homebrews due to 3.60 kernel, fat runs all with 1.50 kernel. it goes back and forth.

if you use the psp as a remote, you have to stick with the fat, because the slim doesn't have the iR port. it's replaced with the wlan switch.


one thing i want to see on a m33 update for the slim, iso/cso caching. it would fully utilize the memory upgrade. also, i'm waiting for the new battery door cover. i wanna use my 2200mAh battery on the slim.
[ + quote]
ps2: v7 scph-39001 - independence exploit - hdloader 0.8c - maxtor 300gb hdd
(+[__]%) psp slim ta-085v1: 6.60 PRO B10
wii (powered by bootmii/priiloader): 4.1u - d2x v10beta53-alt (base 56) - configurable usb loader v70r51/devolution r188 - wd scorpio black 7200rpm 320gig w/ ams venus ds2 enclosure

got a whole lot more to list . . .

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 5. October 2007 @ 00:06
sirksam
Member
_ 		5. October 2007 @ 18:10 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
If I were you, I would just stick with the fat PSP, I went out and bought myself a PSP just a week ago, and I chose the fat one so that I could get a blue one, and the guy could downgrade the 3.50 kernel to 1.50 and then up to 3.52 M33-4, and it only cost me an extra 30RMB (3.75 US dollars) to do it. I could of got the Slim one and done the same, but it would of cost me more, and once you brick your PSP Slim, thats it, its over.
[ + quote]
afterdawn.com > forums > consoles > sony psp - general discussion > slim or fat
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork