|
Windows 7 coming in 2009
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 8 April, 2008
According to Bill Gates, the upcoming Windows 7 operating system will be arriving sooner than previously reported, and as soon as 2009.
During a speech for the Inter-American Development Bank, Gates said, "Sometime in the next year or so we will have a new version. [of the Vista OS]"
It is unclear if Gates meant the full commercial rollout of the new OS or just a beta but either way ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
Junior Member
|
9. April 2008 @ 00:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
this almost sounds like they're abandoning vista.
which wouldn't be that bad if i hadn't JUST bought a laptop.
of course it has vista, which uses ~50mb of ram to do NOTHING.
luckily i knew this, so i got one with enough memory.
if this goes down and the new one is better, i'll probably be breaking ms' copyrights.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
9. April 2008 @ 00:59 |
Link to this message
|
Articles like this http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/04/0...00-tests_1.html don't help them any.
Add to that the stupid license problems, and all the cracked ones now circulating.. plus the general unreliability and you can see why M$ are very probably calling time on a failure. It isn't the first time they screwed up big time, but it may just be the last as business is moving away from commercial (and expensive) things that don't actually do anything that they see as a benefit to them. Constant loss of productivity because of a broken OS is why business hasn't adopted vista. The ones that have are regretting it more and more with each passing day. The only IT companies that install full vista networks and machines into businesses are normally ripoff artists selling discontinued retail machines which retailers are quietly dumping into bulk auctions. ( I see home basic and home premium a lot in small new office setups.. why is that otherwise?)
costs vs performance. Vista fails on both counts if you are a business using it in a work environment. the number of times I get called out to hack past an administrator account on a vista printer server because it has yet again lost it's drivers and the person with the password is at the other end of the country are incredible.
It's becoming my bread and butter trade.. and I'm a unix mainframe and process control server engineer, not a domestic (read amateur) pc repairer.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9. April 2008 @ 01:03
|
Junior Member
|
9. April 2008 @ 01:08 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by varnull:
I'm waiting for skeil909 to get his first encounter with vundo or stormworm variant. When he can't remove it because it has higher than administrator rights and restore attempt leads to BSOD os recovery failure screen on boot he will be ever so sick.
You'll be waiting a very, very long time. I haven't had a virus in any of my personal systems in over a decade. I have removed my fair share from customer pc's and corporate networks over the past 16 years though.
I don't endorse or recommend Vista. I simply stated that once it's tweaked it does run very well. Personally, I don't see how anyone can use Vista in it's default state. The UAC is a complete pile of crap and should be disabled asap, along with Windows Defender. All you need is a good 3rd party firewall, descent AV and a little common sense.
I recommend nothing but XP Pro to the companies I work with and don't want any of them switching to Vista anytime soon. I don't have a single customer who has Vista.
Once you've cleaned up Vista it can and does run really smooth though. Well, Vista 64 anyhow, and with a quad-core and 8gb of ram. :)
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
9. April 2008 @ 01:13 |
Link to this message
|
Fair enough.. the default state for vista around me is "Uninstalled if humanly possible"
Still it shouldn't need tweaking and fixing just to get the basic promised functionality to work should it?
some vista stupidity
Quote:
Once Firefox is installed, there are two icons on my Desktop I'd like to remove: The Setup application itself and a shortcut to Firefox. So I select both icons and drag them to the Recycle Bin. Simple, right?
Wrong. Here's what you have to go through to actually delete those files in Windows Vista. First, you get a File Access Denied dialog (Figure) explaining that you don't, in fact, have permission to delete a ... shortcut?? To an application you just installed??? Seriously?
You can just see Apple's ad's for Leopard
"On Leopard you can even delete your own shortcuts without an admin password!"
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 9. April 2008 @ 01:16
|
|
Iconaw1
Junior Member
1 product review
|
9. April 2008 @ 10:28 |
Link to this message
|
|
Ya i like the way vista looks but i do find myself tweaking all the settings, it is somewhat slow though, I wouldn't mind a Vista lite version.
|
AfterDawn Addict
23 product reviews
|
9. April 2008 @ 15:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
Vista Live CD on HD!
LMFAO!
|
|
DieMPAA
Newbie
|
9. April 2008 @ 17:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
Vista = Windows Me 2
Windows 7 will hopefully be a worthwhile one.
|
|
susieqbbb
Suspended permanently
|
9. April 2008 @ 18:48 |
Link to this message
|
microsoft releasing another crap os oh great.
Vista sucks to much memory to many pieces of spyware and malware.
Windows XP gives users malware and spyware even with a virus scanner installed.
Windows 2000 gave users the ntsf partition faliure.
Windows ME is known in hacker circles as Windows With Many Errors
Windows 98 nice system but a little underpowered
Windows 95 great operating system microsoft should have kept supporting this os not 98
Anyone see a pattern here.
This is why i went to apple
no viruses no spyware lots of free applications and free games and no product activation.
|
AfterDawn Addict
23 product reviews
|
9. April 2008 @ 19:09 |
Link to this message
|
|
Only part I agree in with you is Windows Me. Vista is bad if you have a slow computer but is decent if you have a very powerful computer. it's not an OS that I would use everyday. XP is amazing. When installed yourself and kept in good condition, it works like a charm. I haven't had a virus in 2 years, or a reinstall or XP.
2000 was pretty stable, NTFS errors came from a corrupted file system that could be prevented by proper shutdowns. 98 and 98SE was awesome. Very stable. Integrating true plug and play like ME would have helped though. Windows 95 was a great lightweight fast OS for everyday work, not for gaming/multimedia though.
About all the Virus and Spyware stuff, If you get virus's and spyware on your computer that badly, It's just the sites you go on or the things you do that gets it for you. I have had 1 virus attack in the last 3 years that almost took out my OS but with patience and XP's safe mode, I was able to completely recover my computer.
|
Junior Member
1 product review
|
9. April 2008 @ 23:30 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by core2kid:
About all the Virus and Spyware stuff, If you get virus's and spyware on your computer that badly, It's just the sites you go on or the things you do that gets it for you.
I couldn't agree more. These are exactly the type of problems that keep me in business. A parent calls me because their 16-year old idiot son has crashed their PC. Imagine the looks on their faces when I'm able to show them their kid's browsing history! ;-)
|
|
susieqbbb
Suspended permanently
|
10. April 2008 @ 06:26 |
Link to this message
|
not true in fact some sites that are being posted as legit sites and legal downloads contain spyware like did you know that all of the internet explorer toolbar add-ons contain tracking spyware that is blocked from being searched by your virus scanners the only scanners i have found that find this happen to be avg which i find is surprising that a virus scanner designed by hackers for hackers found a virus and a piece of malware that mcafee and norton both miss and on the subject of keeping windows xp in working order when you have to run disk defragmenter every week thanks to the install of service pack 2 and you have to keep installing updates that dont delete the temp files used to install them and store these temp files in your windows directory and bog down your machine even more. no thank you
|
|
SProdigy
Senior Member
5 product reviews
|
10. April 2008 @ 09:01 |
Link to this message
|
In defense of Microsoft, considering most of us here are complaining about the OS vendor they are MOST LIKELY using...
- Vista is bloated. It runs well on proper hardware, but stupid things like UAC and copying/moving files to another drive/network or unzipping archives is just nerve-racking. Why on Earth wasn't this debugged prior to release?
- XP is a VERY stable system, especially with SP2. Keep it patched with the proper AV/Spyware/Firewall software and you're set. (As long as you stay away from the porn/warez sites.)
- If you were a hacker, would you produce malware for a system with 2% penetration into the market? I doubt it. So I wish people would stop squabbling about Mac OS and Linux. No one cares about those, including hackers. It shows when you have trouble finding software on those systems outside of web browsing and email.
I don't take pleasure in dropping a couple hundred dollars for an OS upgrade (ie. Leopard) when MS patches their system for free (see SP2.) I also like to build and repair my own system, and shouldn't have a company (Apple) dictate what I can and cannot have in it hardware-wise.
- Windows ME was indeed garbage. MS forced this out, but was clearly focused on 2000, the predecessor to XP.
- Windows 98SE was great for it's time. It still surprises me how many people say they love this OS and how it's the best, blah, blah. I think some of us are still running 10 year old systems and are too afraid to let go.
- Windows 95 was revolutionary, but honestly, PLUG AND PLAY? Even 98SE didn't get this straight. I bet most noobs on PC's would be lost trying to get modem or sound card drivers to work on 95/98/ME systems because we've been spoiled by XP.
There I said what's on my mind. Notice I didn't just go on a rant about Windows being crap. Take care of the house you live in, and all will be okay.
|
Junior Member
|
10. April 2008 @ 15:50 |
Link to this message
|
I don't know how many people will agree with this. But I think a lot of the issues in M$ OS's are them dumb windows updates. They come in flawed. I think they create more issues then they patch or open you up to more issues. I have not installed any windows updates to my XP since its been out. I never get viruses. But all you need to be is smart about what you do and anyone can avoid them. As for them creating a new OS. If they abandon the DRM era they will probably have some success with it. Its stupid to restrict people's PC's after they paid their hard earned money on it. I think its all bogus marketing that political people support.
|
AfterDawn Addict
23 product reviews
|
10. April 2008 @ 20:50 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by spydah:
I don't know how many people will agree with this. But I think a lot of the issues in M$ OS's are them dumb windows updates. They come in flawed. I think they create more issues then they patch or open you up to more issues. I have not installed any windows updates to my XP since its been out. I never get viruses. But all you need to be is smart about what you do and anyone can avoid them. As for them creating a new OS. If they abandon the DRM era they will probably have some success with it. Its stupid to restrict people's PC's after they paid their hard earned money on it. I think its all bogus marketing that political people support.
I've never had windows update screw up my PC beyond repair until Vista updated my sound card drivers. If a device is installed and there is an update to the driver, Windows update will not automatically install that, it will ask you ONLY when you go to update.microsoft.com. It only installes the security updates and service packs by default. Remember that when a new service pack comes out it's bound to have problems, remember everyone complaining about SP2? After some time new updates come to patch SP2 to make it extremely stable. I'm running the Beta of SP3 on my computer and have not had any problems. I am running vista on a Q6600/6800GT/200GB SATA/4GB RAM and I am rated a 5. Not had any problems yet.
|
Senior Member
|
12. April 2008 @ 16:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
if it will be a fraction of vista, they can stick it up thier gege
|
|
avoidz
Junior Member
|
13. April 2008 @ 10:04 |
Link to this message
|
|
XP is still great, seven years later. Vista is a pretty demo sitting on store shelves, but that's it.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
LSUnum1
Newbie
|
13. April 2008 @ 10:40 |
Link to this message
|
|
As crappy as Vista is, I have to thank Microsoft for the increased Mac sales we are having at work, I have sold at least 5 eMacs and notebooks in the last month or so.
THANKS MICROSOFT!!
|
