|
|
|
Last.FM is boosting CD sales?
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 13 April, 2008
In January, Last.FM began offering music streaming on-demand instead of by simple genre or keyword searches. Three times a day users can listen to a track of their choosing regardless of artist or genre.
With the format change also came affiliate partnerships with iTunes, Amazon and 7Digital that allows Last.FM users to click through from any song they are listening to and purchase the ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
|
nobrainer
Suspended permanently
|
13. April 2008 @ 19:28 |
Link to this message
|
Stop The Press, OMG Amazing news, being able to listen to music freely actually encourages ppl to purchase media they enjoy, holy crap what will they think up next.
And i thought that free media was destroying music that's why the RIAA (soundexchange) lobbied to charged huge amounts to web broadcasters, basically forcing most of them off the web, except for a few courporate owned ones like last.fm that is owned by none other than CBS.
New RIAA royalty fees may bankrupt Internet radio industry
Radio royalties: the ticking timebomb under the RIAA
RIAA Claims Ownership of All Artist Royalties For Internet Radio
Basically they want to remain in control (gatekeepers) of the media, and if its an indie band the RIAA wants to block them from being able to be played unless they have a courporate backer to steal all the artists monies for their hard work. Kinda like how the central banks (federal reserve, bank of england, ect) work, well they do very little and cream off all the rewards.
Originally posted by bottom link:
So how it works is that SoundExchange collects money through compulsory royalties from Webcasters and holds onto the money. If a label or artist wants their share of the money, they must become a member of SoundExchange and pay a fee to collect their royalties (http://soundexchange.com/faq.html#b6). But, and this is a big "but," you only get royalties if you own the sound recording copyright. If you are signed to a major label, chances are you don?t. Even if you do own the copyright to your own recording of your own song, SoundExchange will collect Internet radio royalties for your song even if you don?t want them to do so.
Originally posted by top link:
How does this affect medium-size webcasters?
Radio Paradise's Bill Goldsmith notes, "This royalty structure would wipe out an entire class of business: Small independent webcasters such as myself & my wife, who operate Radio Paradise. Our obligation under this rate structure would be equal to over 125% of our total income. There is no practical way for us to increase our income so dramatically as to render that affordable."
And Radio Paradise is perhaps the most-successful webcaster in its class! For most operators, this rate looks as if it would be >150-200% of total revenues.
don't let big media dictate our culture ppl, boycott the anti-consumer, anti-artist, big media, they are listed in my sig.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. April 2008 @ 19:39
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
|
atomicxl
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
13. April 2008 @ 20:59 |
Link to this message
|
|
This is free music provided by a site that facilitates and makes it easy to purchase music. Not some random P2P or torrent page. If illegal downloading (which this is not) helped CD sales you wouldn't see CD sales dropping. This type of thing is a good move. It seems like if you support it and make it easy to purchase/listen almost at the same time, you can see sales.
You're kind of living in a dream world with the stuff suggested in your sig. I'd never encourage people to take money out of artists hands and not buy music and other media. Why buy 2nd hand when you can support the artists? You say the labels rob them, yet buying 2nd hand gives them ZERO money. Who's the real thief? At least the label paid for studio time, paid for art design, puts up money for them to tour, pays for record promotion, pays for... and the list goes on.
|
|
nobrainer
Suspended permanently
|
13. April 2008 @ 22:34 |
Link to this message
|
@ atomicxl
it was sarcasm, as its obvious that radio and web streaming HELP sales, but the RIAA has done everything in its power to diminish streaming to a few courporate sites in another grasp at being the GateKeepers of media, which is what i am moaning about, don't get me wrong i think last.fm is a good service (poor since the sell out to CBS) as is pandora which can no longer operate outside the US because of the royalty hike.Read the Links, do some research.
boycott manufactured music that relies on devices like auto tune, teams of writers with music aimed at teenagers, and a pretty face/six pack to sell talentless rubbish that Big Media churn out every day simply to generate cash for them not real artistsm and this is what ppl should boycott.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 13. April 2008 @ 22:44
|
|
sgriesch
Junior Member
|
14. April 2008 @ 22:12 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
being able to listen to music freely actually encourages ppl to purchase media they enjoyQuote:
Yeah. I wish this was around 15 years ago. I would own a lot fewer CD's than I have now. THEY ENJOY are key words. Now that we can download just the songs we want, we can skip the crap and just buy the good stuff. It makes the artist have to try and make only good stuff. The industry needs to listen to the consumer instead of suing them. I might actually buy more music if it were reasonably priced, DRM free, and high quality. Hint, hint RIAA.
|
|
lilyqweas
Newbie
|
15. April 2008 @ 00:51 |
Link to this message
|
|
|
|
nobrainer
Suspended permanently
|
15. April 2008 @ 15:38 |
Link to this message
|
|
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 15. April 2008 @ 15:39
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
21. April 2008 @ 09:16 |
Link to this message
|
Hey nobrainer all good points. The RIAA has slowly killed everything it touches due to their unlimited greed. They just need to suck the life out of everything they can get their hands on.
Even their P2P attacks have probably backfired. Not that they have slowed down or losened up any. They have probably been punishing 80% innocent and 20% stupid. That is my wild guess. I know they have not given any slack to persons with unsecured wireless networks and parents of kinds who download. I am only guessing, but I bet they have created a huge population of new enemies who have been complaining to law makers. This is all pure speculation on my part. However, no good laws have come their way in a while. I am sure it is not due to lack of trying. They have shown themselves to be the lowest of the low at every turn.
|
|
