|
|
|
Microsoft denies Blu-ray Xbox 360s, again
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 5 May, 2008
Despite reports that a Blu-ray Xbox 360 is in the works from an ASUS subsidiary, Microsoft has once again moved to deny the rumors.
Microsoft had no comment when the reports hit last week, but now an official has sent an email to the popular gaming website GamePro denying the reports.
"As we have stated, we have no plans to introduce a Blu-ray drive for Xbox 360. Games are what drive ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
Senior Member
5 product reviews
|
6. May 2008 @ 08:01 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by nobrainer:
@ Ryu77
you have digressed somewhat my friend from my post about media manipulation to get free advertising and at the same time calling dvd optical media stone age. blu-ray for gaming is not needed.
The way you twist words is worse than a Woman. I referenced floppy discs as being from the stone age not DVD's.
I did state however, that a capacity of 8.5GB does sound kind of limiting (the actual word I used was "lame") in the High-Def age, especially when 50GB Blu-ray discs are readily available.
Free advertising?? What? You must be kidding. You might as well suggest that we shut down AfterDawn then... As Microsoft, Apple, Sony, Toshiba, Netflix, Warner Bros. etc. etc. get way too much free advertising.
You really need to get out more. The future needs people that are ready to accept new ideas and technology, not those that want to hold onto the past.
PS: Both those links you provided have nothing to do with the type of DRM that Blu-ray has utilised. In actual fact, I don't even know if BD+ or AACS can be termed "DRM". The mechanisms in place on Blu-ray discs are more better termed copy prevention technologies... All of which are easily penetrable.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. May 2008 @ 08:16
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
|
viny1313
Newbie
|
6. May 2008 @ 08:05 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
@ Ryu77
you have digressed somewhat my friend from my post about media manipulation to get free advertising and at the same time calling dvd optical media stone age. blu-ray for gaming is not needed.
anyways it all rather sounds like an excuses list, that are issued to sales men.
For the second time, i do NOT care on the medium as long as it's cheap, consumer friendly (no drm), fast and reliable.
solid state is the way forward, the mechanics of optical media is "the stone age" blu-ray is no different.
what does drm do exactly, it gives the studios unreasonable anti consumer tools to rip every one off and impose extra charges lets not forget sony is the mpaa/riaa and these tactics are not welcomed, you can ask m$ all about that with their os crippling DRM forced on them by the MPAA.
DRM is price fixing.
iPod tax: UK music biz open to format shifting... for a feeOriginally posted by link:
Device manufacturers, who are apparently building their fortunes on the back of the music industry's content without paying for the privilege (err, but didn't the consumers already pay for the discs?), would have to pay a license fee to the music business that would be split among all the involved parties according to a formula that makes the Schrodinger equation look like a bit of first-term algebra.
A Cost Analysis of Windows Vista Content Protection Originally posted by link:
This is by design: as Jack Valenti, former head of the MPAA, put it, ?If you buy a DVD you have a copy. If you want a backup copy you buy another one?). It's obvious why this type of business model makes the pain of pushing content protection onto consumers so worthwhile since it practically constitutes a license to print money.
I think it's needed... That or some other media device with a bigger capacity... If games continue to be limmited by space then they won't get any better then they already are.
Basically without the extra space they won't be able to expand.
E.g. I think Resistance 2 for PS3 is supposed to take up a full dual layer BR disc and it's supposed to have like 2 campaigns and 60 player multiplayer (so I've heard) and Gears of War as an 8 hour campaign, a tad short... Halo 3 was no better...
|
|
Vr0cK
Newbie
|
6. May 2008 @ 08:13 |
Link to this message
|
@ nobrainer and ryu77...you guys are funny n pointing out solid stuff here and there. Im for Blu-ray, so i feel more for ryu77. But to nobrainer im sure Blu-ray will become the cheaper medium and reliable as its the only new medium up from DVDs, and when DVDs become like CDs what will you use for your new "DVD type" medium? People can hate Sony and their DRM etc, but eventually they cant ignore them unless the entire world will disregard the whole disc medium altogether since Blu-ray is the next gen medium. Maybe not anytime soon, but ppl are slowly starting to upgrade and if Blu-ray still exsist im sure you will too.
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
6. May 2008 @ 09:10 |
Link to this message
|
Doubtful.. some of us have already embraced the future without overpriced ripoff media and are streaming HD downloaded content to large screen displays... all without the need for anything more than a good graphics card, a decent amount of ram and a good internet connection.
If you use the myth-tv system it just shows how obsolete these large capacity fragile disks are.
M$ could have also ensured the survival of a doomed media format by fitting the 360 with a hd-dvd drive and supplying games on that medium.. Instead they chose tried and tested technology for reasons of cost, and probably because their futurologists saw the end of hd spinning disks within the life of the console.
3 or 4 years and the 100 gig stick will be a reality and games will be sold as roms again, (they are now.. but you know what I mean if you are a gamer) on sticks or by download. It is possible the 360 has been designed with this very future in mind... why else the usb ports?
The blu boys are crying because their format of choice is languishing in the pit of general rejection now the "format war" is over and the people who want to pay a fortune "keeping up with the Joneses" have spent for little return.
Another beta/umd fiasco? very likely.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
6. May 2008 @ 09:47 |
Link to this message
|
varnull
HDVD would have been perfect for games because there are no burners out or at least not many, the format is jsut prefect for gaming, but for a HD system you need a full media setup, so BR it is, but if they over price it they lose.
|
|
emugamer
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
6. May 2008 @ 12:13 |
Link to this message
|
Yeah, I don't understand why MS didn't just take over HDDVD as its own format for the 360. If there are very little HDVDVD burners available, then a game with loads of content would be a lot more difficult to strip and downsize to a DVD-9.
Blu-ray re-writeable discs retail for $.60/GB.
DVD-9 discs retail for $.27/GB
HDD space varies, but can be found to average $.20/GB
I'm bluray all the way now, but not for the movies. At least not until they go down in price. Because while some people complain about crippling anti-consumer DRM, I know that where there is a will, there is a way, and it will always get cracked. So if I own a bluray movie and I want a backup to play instead of the original, I know that there will always be a place to download it. I agree with Ryu77 regarding the need to store more content on higher capacity media. More information requires more space. A form of higher capacity media seems like it would help the 360. The 360 seems to be on its way to becoming a multi-media center rather than a gaming console.
I want the space bluray provides. I purchased a HD camcorder recently for my family. It records at approximately 108 MB's/minute at amazing quality. I don't have the hardware to edit it yet, and I can only view the movies on my PC through a program provided that scales it down for viewing. So I archive everything as data on DVD-9 discs. About 70 minutes at a time. I'm looking to my next build in a year and bluray burners and media coming down a little more in price, so that I can do what I did when DVD-9's came out - consolidate.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. May 2008 @ 12:15
|
|
nobrainer
Suspended permanently
|
6. May 2008 @ 12:55 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Ryu77:
I did state however, that a capacity of 8.5GB does sound kind of limiting (the actual word I used was "lame") in the High-Def age, especially when 50GB Blu-ray discs are readily available.
so is tape which is much faster than, dvd and blu-ray and is far cheaper and holds in excess of 300gb, i suppose this is why its used for servers and why blu-ray will never be used for servers or backups!
optical media is limited by mechanics which is why solid state will be the format of the future as soon as price allows as the data transfer speed is unmatched and there is already flash cards in greater sizes than blu-ray but of course sony would make their own propertarian format and call it Memory Stick PRO Duo Drm Malware Rootit The Third, while other manufacturers choose somthing like much cheaper SD and sony products would block all other cheaper, none sony brands because DRM, and copwrite is there to protect the consumer eh!
Originally posted by Ryu77:
Free advertising?? What? You must be kidding. You might as well suggest that we shut down AfterDawn then... As Microsoft, Apple, Sony, Toshiba, Netflix, Warner Bros. etc. etc. get way too much free advertising.
the free advertising is via fud created and the interweb goes crazy, its typical public relations spin, because it's in the news means ppl are talking about it, and because m$ 360 has not got a blu-ray drive and the ps3 has, its pro sony anti m$, queue the 360 stone age blu-ray future, remarks and buckets of free advertising for the future format!!!
and from that point you digressed and changed to path of this thread stating pro blu-ray comments about ppl care about the films and it look awesome. is the 360 a movie player?
Originally posted by Ryu77:
PS: Both those links you provided have nothing to do with the type of DRM that Blu-ray has utilised. In actual fact, I don't even know if BD+ or AACS can be termed "DRM". The mechanisms in place on Blu-ray discs are more better termed copy prevention technologies... All of which are easily penetrable.
the links were about DRM restrictions being used by the mpaa/riaa aka sony to price fix and dictate to customers that if they want to shift media they own then sony wants to get paid every time you move it from one device you own to another and wants to stop ppl being able to backup their media as selling multiple copies to ppl generates more revenue.
AACS are the mpaa's tool to block all untrusted connections and BD+ is possible the most anti consumer drm ever conceived, paving the way for anti-consumer licensing that sony already started with the psn release of warhawk and xcp rootkit with phone home authorisation media that you don't own and are not allowed to sell or lend.
Sony's EULA is worse than their rootkit
Originally posted by sony eula via link:
If you're unfortunate enough to buy music from Sony, you may think that the worst thing they'll do to you is screw you by infecting your computer with malicious rootkit software. Not so! Rootkits are only the beginning. If you want to see how Sony really gives its customers the shaft, have a look at these conditions in the license you have to agree to when you put a Sony music CD in your computer:
1. If your house gets burgled, you have to delete all your music from your laptop when you get home. That's because the EULA says that your rights to any copies terminate as soon as you no longer possess the original CD.
2. You can't keep your music on any computers at work. The EULA only gives you the right to put copies on a "personal home computer system owned by you."
3. If you move out of the country, you have to delete all your music. The EULA specifically forbids "export" outside the country where you reside.
4. You must install any and all updates, or else lose the music on your computer. The EULA immediately terminates if you fail to install any update. No more holding out on those hobble-ware downgrades masquerading as updates.
5. Sony-BMG can install and use backdoors in the copy protection software or media player to "enforce their rights" against you, at any time, without notice. And Sony-BMG disclaims any liability if this "self help" crashes your computer, exposes you to security risks, or any other harm.
6. The EULA says Sony-BMG will never be liable to you for more than $5.00. That's right, no matter what happens, you can't even get back what you paid for the CD.
7. If you file for bankruptcy, you have to delete all the music on your computer. Seriously.
8. You have no right to transfer the music on your computer, even along with the original CD.
9. Forget about using the music as a soundtrack for your latest family photo slideshow, or mash-ups, or sampling. The EULA forbids changing, altering, or make derivative works from the music on your computer.
but, but sony need to do this to protect us from pirates!
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. May 2008 @ 13:26
|
|
SDF_GR
Member
1 product review
|
6. May 2008 @ 14:53 |
Link to this message
|
@nobrainer
Ryu said it once and i repost he's words
Originally posted by Ryu77:
The way you twist words is worse than a Woman.
@ ryu77 i really admire your patiences.
@nobrainer
I work at graphic arts, and yes nobrainer we back up to BD long time now, cause even the verb DVD's are less trust worthy than a BD disc.
BD are scratch proof, durabis does it's job really good, and 25-50gb you can backup a lot of staff at once.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
6. May 2008 @ 14:55 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
@nobrainer
Ryu said it once and i repost he's words
Originally posted by Ryu77:
The way you twist words is worse than a Woman.
@ ryu77 i really admire your patiences.
@nobrainer
I work at graphic arts, and yes nobrainer we back up to BD long time now, cause even the verb DVD's are less trust worthy than a BD disc.
BD are scratch proof, durabis does it's job really good, and 25-50gb you can backup a lot of staff at once.
SDF_GR
BR is not cost effective yet, its cheaper to use a rack with HDDs in it more often then not.
|
|
nobrainer
Suspended permanently
|
6. May 2008 @ 16:18 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by ZippyDSM:
Quote:
@nobrainer
Ryu said it once and i repost he's words
Originally posted by Ryu77:
The way you twist words is worse than a Woman.
@ ryu77 i really admire your patiences.
@nobrainer
I work at graphic arts, and yes nobrainer we back up to BD long time now, cause even the verb DVD's are less trust worthy than a BD disc.
BD are scratch proof, durabis does it's job really good, and 25-50gb you can backup a lot of staff at once.
SDF_GR
BR is not cost effective yet, its cheaper to use a rack with HDDs in it more often then not.
@ SDF_GR
lmfao, omg how long does it take to backup and restore using you oh so good format?
@ zippy
i doubt there is truth there zippy as i'm sure you know that mostly all firms use tape or caddies and the very small ones use multiple dvd's but this works out expensive with even poor backups of monthly and incremental and as you pointed out what company would waste monies on a format that has so many cost effective alternatives i think he's talking fluff.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. May 2008 @ 16:26
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
6. May 2008 @ 16:33 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by nobrainer:
Originally posted by ZippyDSM:
Quote:
@nobrainer
Ryu said it once and i repost he's words
Originally posted by Ryu77:
The way you twist words is worse than a Woman.
@ ryu77 i really admire your patiences.
@nobrainer
I work at graphic arts, and yes nobrainer we back up to BD long time now, cause even the verb DVD's are less trust worthy than a BD disc.
BD are scratch proof, durabis does it's job really good, and 25-50gb you can backup a lot of staff at once.
SDF_GR
BR is not cost effective yet, its cheaper to use a rack with HDDs in it more often then not.
@ SDF_GR
lmfao, omg how long does it take to backup and restore using you oh so good format?
@ zippy
i doubt there is truth there zippy as i'm sure you know that mostly all firms use tape or caddies and the very small ones use multiple dvd's but this works out expensive with even poor backups of monthly and incremental and as you pointed out what company would waste monies on a format that has so many cost effective alternatives i think he's talking fluff.
lets see 500GB HDDs are say 75$ a pop average
BR is oh 800 a a slow burner and discs are 17-30$ a disc,so 170$ for the first 500GB ,and hello you can pull the HDD and store it just as easy as 10+ BR discs,plus no need to sperate archives.
now when you can get 500GB of space for 50$ and the burner is 200$ thats a whole other ball game.
Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Lets renegotiate them.
|
|
SDF_GR
Member
1 product review
|
6. May 2008 @ 17:10 |
Link to this message
|
@ nobrainer
it takes me 10years, so? You point? DVD did the same time when were 1st released.
Speaking of the devil, at 2001 at my company we have bough a philips x1 dvd recorder, 980 euros!!!!plus that when we were writing DVD's we didnt even breath over the PC.
Now tell me nobrainer cause i cant recall, how much cost had a blank DVDr 4,5gb back in 2001?
Cause now we pay 20euros for a 50gb blank scratch proof disc.
......and tape??backup on tape???and you complain about the BD recording time???
OMG you dont know what you saying?do you?
and what DVD cost?when you are a company you dont buy 1 dvd you buy thousands.
We get 1000 dvd's 10cases x 100 dvd's each for 100euros, what DVD back up cost? 10euros for 100dvd's.
were is the high cost? if you find it let me know.
and to prove you that you don't know what you are saying, if a customer asks he's job.....
what i will say to him?
wait 3 years to restore it from the tape?
Ryu77 you are a hero mate.
@ZippyDSM
When the job is a 1000+pages book, with tif and eps files , with size from 50mb to 300mb or even more, well we rather burn 1 disc rather 11 dvdrs.
I have Postscripts more than 10gb's each that were never been back up, i was tranfering them from server to server every time that i wanted to change/do something something, with DB i must have free up more or less 5tb.
Dunno what you are saying but BD recorder has given back to us the money , just from the HDD space that we regain.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
6. May 2008 @ 17:16 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by SDF_GR:
@ nobrainer
it takes me 10years, so? You point? DVD did the same time when were 1st released.
Speaking of the devil, at 2001 at my company we have bough a philips x1 dvd recorder, 980 euros!!!!plus that when we were writing DVD's we didnt even breath over the PC.
Now tell me nobrainer cause i cant recall, how much cost had a blank DVDr 4,5gb back in 2001?
Cause now we pay 20euros for a 50gb blank scratch proof disc.
......and tape??backup on tape???and you complain about the BD recording time???
OMG you dont know what you saying?do you?
and what DVD cost?when you are a company you dont buy 1 dvd you buy thousands.
We get 1000 dvd's 10cases x 100 dvd's each for 100euros, what DVD back up cost? 10euros for 100dvd's.
were is the high cost? if you find it let me know.
and to prove you that you don't know what you are saying, if a customer asks he's job.....
what i will say to him?
wait 3 years to restore it from the tape?
Ryu77 you are a hero mate.
@ZippyDSM
When the job is a 1000+pages book, with tif and eps files , with size from 50mb to 300mb or even more, well we rather burn 1 disc rather 11 dvdrs.
I have Postscripts more than 10gb's each that were never been back up, i was tranfering them from server to server every time that i wanted to change/do something something, with DB i must have free up more or less 5tb.
Dunno what you are saying but BD recorder has given back to us the money , just from the HDD space that we regain.
umm your not listing.... hard drives are cheaper than BR, hot swapable you can load a HDD fil it up and archive it and ti will take up less space than BR of the same data size and tis all cheaper and faster than BR.....
Hell I have changed from DVD9s to HDDs because its cheaper.
|
Junior Member
1 product review
|
6. May 2008 @ 21:48 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Hell I have changed from DVD9s to HDDs because its cheaper.
... yes hdd space is cheaper... unless you own a 360. Which, afterall... is what this article is (or was) about in the first place.
|
Senior Member
5 product reviews
|
6. May 2008 @ 22:24 |
Link to this message
|
Zippy, whilst I agree to some extent that archiving on a HDD has it's purpose, I seriously doubt that the production studios will start supplying media on a HDD... Wouldn't you agree?
Also, at work the other day I noticed we were selling a packet of 5 Verbatim BD-R's for $30 (Australian)... So that's $6 each or $30 for 125GB. Already we are seeing a price point that is showing signs of becoming more cost efficient than a HDD and is even starting to rival blank DVD's.
One last point is to consider the space saving that archiving with BD-R's will offer. Soon enough we will see 50GB discs at a reasonable price point (there is even talk of quad layer). Imagine a spindle of 50 Dual Layer BD-R's, so that's 2500GB. Now imagine having the same memory capacity in HDD's. I will even give you the benefit of saying that we are using the smaller 2.5" HDD's (5 x 500GB). You will still need some type of enclosure to readily access the data on these drives. Either way the Blu-ray discs will be far more space efficient and readily accessed as opposed to having some type of hot swappable HDD set-up or having them in external enclosures.
nobrainer, once again you are quoting material that has nothing to do with Blu-ray. What does the rootkit EULA have to do with Blu-ray exactly?
Please remember, The Blu-ray Disc Association is not just Sony!
As of today the BDA has more than 250 members and supporters. There are currently 18 members that comprise the Board of Directors, these are Sony, Pioneer, Philips, Thomson, LG Electronics, Hitachi, Sharp, Samsung, Apple, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Mitsubishi Electric, Panasonic (Matsushita Electric), Sun Microsystems, TDK Corporation, Twentieth Century Fox, Disney and Warner Bros.
The rest of the 250+ is comprised of contributors and standard members etc.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. May 2008 @ 22:26
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
6. May 2008 @ 22:30 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Ryu77:
Zippy, whilst I agree to some extent that archiving on a HDD has it's purpose, I seriously doubt that the production studios will start supplying media on a HDD... Wouldn't you agree?
Also, at work the other day I noticed we were selling a packet of 5 Verbatim BD-R's for $30 (Australian)... So that's $6 each or $30 for 125GB. Already we are seeing a price point that is showing signs of becoming more cost efficient than a HDD and is even starting to rival blank DVD's.
One last point is to consider the space saving that archiving with BD-R's will offer. Soon enough we will see 50GB discs at a reasonable price point (there is even talk of quad layer). Imagine a spindle of 50 Dual Layer BD-R's, so that's 2500GB. Now imagine having the same memory capacity in HDD's. I will even give you the benefit of saying that we are using the smaller 2.5" HDD's (5 x 500GB). You will still need some type of enclosure to readily access the data on these drives. Either way the Blu-ray discs will be far more space efficient and readily accessed as opposed to having some type of hot swappable HDD set-up or having them in external enclosures.
nobrainer, once again you are quoting material that has nothing to do with Blu-ray. What does the rootkit EULA have to do with Blu-ray exactly?
Please remember, The Blu-ray Disc Association is not just Sony!
As of today the BDA has more than 250 members and supporters. There are currently 18 members that comprise the Board of Directors, these are Sony, Pioneer, Philips, Thomson, LG Electronics, Hitachi, Sharp, Samsung, Apple, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Mitsubishi Electric, Panasonic (Matsushita Electric), Sun Microsystems, TDK Corporation, Twentieth Century Fox, Disney and Warner Bros.
The rest of the 250+ is comprised of contributers and standard members etc.
thats not new retail price tho...... discount close out on off or low brands do not count.
in 2 years a 1TB HDD will be 70$ and take up less space 20 50GB discs, price V cost V space BR is not there yet.
If you can get 10 50GB BR discs verbatim brand for 25$ then ya i would be better,its not better yet its going to be 5 years before we see thos prices the up side drives will be faster and cheaper in that time frame.
|
Junior Member
1 product review
|
6. May 2008 @ 22:56 |
Link to this message
|
|
haha I love it when people start predicting the future to prove a point thats opinion-based at best.
|
Senior Member
5 product reviews
|
6. May 2008 @ 22:57 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by ZippyDSM:
thats not new retail price tho...... discount close out on off or low brands do not count.
So, Verbatim is considered a low brand?
Originally posted by ZippyDSM:
in 2 years a 1TB HDD will be 70$ and take up less space 20 50GB discs, price V cost V space BR is not there yet.
If you can get 10 50GB BR discs verbatim brand for 25$ then ya i would be better,its not better yet its going to be 5 years before we see thos prices the up side drives will be faster and cheaper in that time frame.
Again, I would like to ask if you seriously think that the production studios will deliver media on HDD's?
Also, before the future is in downloadable content brigade hit this thread again, I would like to ask which ISP is providing a service with enough bandwidth to stream content in 1080p? I have ADSL2+ and I've peaked at about 1000Kbs. That's nowhere near enough bandwidth for the content found on Blu-ray discs, which can be anywhere from 15,000Kbs to 45,000Kbs. So either ISP's need a breakthrough in their technology or the advocates of downloadable content will need to start planning their entertainment schedule days in advance.
If I have a sudden desire to watch a new film, I can easily visit my local rental outlet and within a few minutes have a handful of DVD's/Blu-ray discs etc. Even the local Supermarket stocks movies.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
6. May 2008 @ 23:08 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ZippyDSM:
thats not new retail price tho...... discount close out on off or low brands do not count.
So, Verbatim is considered a low brand?
Originally posted by ZippyDSM:
in 2 years a 1TB HDD will be 70$ and take up less space 20 50GB discs, price V cost V space BR is not there yet.
If you can get 10 50GB BR discs verbatim brand for 25$ then ya i would be better,its not better yet its going to be 5 years before we see thos prices the up side drives will be faster and cheaper in that time frame.
Again, I would like to ask if you seriously think that the production studios will deliver media on HDD's?
Also, before the future is in downloadable content brigade hit this thread again, I would like to ask which ISP is providing a service with enough bandwidth to stream content in 1080p? I have ADSL2+ and I've peaked at about 1000Kbs. That's nowhere near enough bandwidth for the content found on Blu-ray discs, which can be anywhere from 15,000Kbs to 45,000Kbs. So either ISP's need a breakthrough in their technology or the advocates of downloadable content will need to start planning their entertainment schedule days in advance.
If I have a sudden desire to watch a new film, I can easily visit my local rental outlet and within a few minutes have a handful of DVD's/Blu-ray discs etc. Even the local Supermarket stocks movies.
Verbatim is a high brand but close outs are not mainstream retail price and thats what most business would pay the going retail rate at volume discount, and I am talking about archiving not as a distribution meduim, for a valid distro meduim flash drives would have to be the size of a CD case or less and offer more space at a good price, I can see in 10 years a flash disc the size of a floppy holding 100GB and begin roughly 50$ give or take 20-30, at volume discount and with other advancements I can see flash drives being a valid option in physically distribution but by that time BR will probably have grown 50GB quadrupled in speed almost twice and half in price twice by twice(4X).
BR is on the road to faster,cheaper,better,stronger as a distro and archiving medium but for now its costly and will remain costly for at least 5 years.
|
Junior Member
1 product review
|
6. May 2008 @ 23:42 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
...in 2 years a 1TB HDD will be 70$ and take up less space 20 50GB discs, price V cost V space BR is not there yet.
...I can see in 10 years a flash disc the size of a floppy holding 100GB and begin roughly 50$ give or take 20-30
Zippy:
Do you do Tarot card readings too?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. May 2008 @ 23:43
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
6. May 2008 @ 23:52 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Quote:
...in 2 years a 1TB HDD will be 70$ and take up less space 20 50GB discs, price V cost V space BR is not there yet.
...I can see in 10 years a flash disc the size of a floppy holding 100GB and begin roughly 50$ give or take 20-30
Zippy:
Do you do Tarot card readings too?
yes and i readz the cards wif mew tong*lick*
No really tech grows at a steady pace
look at these
http://www.buy.com/prod/edge-100gb-2-5-u.../201956013.html
http://www.pcconnection.com/IPA/Shop/Pro...&ci_sku=8539326
Now try and find a good middle ground to size and space in 5+ years should be able to get a 100GB flash drive the keychain size for under 100$, in 10 years they may be under 50, but I think BR has media distro sewn up for the next 7 years at least.
|
|
nobrainer
Suspended permanently
|
7. May 2008 @ 02:32 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Hunt720:
Quote:
Hell I have changed from DVD9s to HDDs because its cheaper.
... yes hdd space is cheaper... unless you own a 360. Which, afterall... is what this article is (or was) about in the first place.
it was Hunt720 but ryu77 changed the topic direction into a pro-blu ray thread, read page 1. btw is it not possible just to hot swap the 360 hd?
http://forums.afterdawn.com/thread_view.cfm/661107#4015061
now its about blu-ray for backups which frankly is unbelievable, time is money and when it takes half the day to transfer 50gigs you ain't going to be doing much work now are you, which is why tape is used with hard drives for second choice!
will the 360 get a blu-ray drive, who cares other than the fud spreader that wants free advertising, but they will need a larger storage medium in the future, lets hope they go solid state and not Drm-Ray!
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 7. May 2008 @ 11:38
|
|
nobrainer
Suspended permanently
|
7. May 2008 @ 11:09 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Ryu77:
nobrainer, once again you are quoting material that has nothing to do with Blu-ray. What does the rootkit EULA have to do with Blu-ray exactly?
Please remember, The Blu-ray Disc Association is not just Sony!
As of today the BDA has more than 250 members and supporters. There are currently 18 members that comprise the Board of Directors, these are Sony, Pioneer, Philips, Thomson, LG Electronics, Hitachi, Sharp, Samsung, Apple, Dell, Hewlett-Packard, Mitsubishi Electric, Panasonic (Matsushita Electric), Sun Microsystems, TDK Corporation, Twentieth Century Fox, Disney and Warner Bros.
why is sony always a part of anti-consumer?
the last thing the xbox needs is sony's propertarian DRM malware blu-ray.
oh btw this is sony drm at work for you!
Mass Effect DRM goes too far M.E. phone home (every ten days)
Originally posted by link:
In a post on Bioware's forums, producer Derek French has confirmed that two of the biggest PC titles of the year - Will Wright's Spore and the Xbox 360 conversion of Mass Effect - will require ongoing, rolling 10-day activation over the internet.
"Mass Effect uses SecuROM and requires an online activation for the first time that you play it," French says. "After the first activation, SecuROM requires that it re-check with the server within ten days (in case the CD Key has become public/warez'd and gets banned). Just so that the 10 day thing doesn't become abrupt, SecuROM tries its first re-check with 5 days remaining in the 10 day window. If it can't contact the server before the 10 days are up, nothing bad happens and the game still runs. After 10 days a re-check is required before the game can run."
Just to re-iterate that point, you will need to re-activate your copy with the publisher every 10 days. Forever.
secuROM is one of sony's anti-consumer draconian DRM measures now just imagine this drm on your blu-ray discs, 360, ps3 games and then think what happens when they turn off them DRM check servers? and if you think that wouldn't happen ask the sony Connect customers that got screwed over last year when sony shut off their drm servers and forced everyone to purchase their media again.
do anyone else see: screw you rom when i read sonys drm name?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 7. May 2008 @ 11:32
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
7. May 2008 @ 11:31 |
Link to this message
|
And M$ customers who are facing exactly that in August when the music servers go offline.
To the nice guy with the HD camcorder. You may find that the open source world has the tools you need to edit your HD video content.
http://cinelerra.org/docs/cinelerra_cv_manual_en.html
A with all open source tools it's anti-drm from the outset. Apart from buying a couple of huge new HDD's you shouldn't need to upgrade any system made in the last 2-3 years.
nb.. have you looked at the dates of the comments in your register link?? something strange going on there.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 7. May 2008 @ 11:49
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
nobrainer
Suspended permanently
|
7. May 2008 @ 11:44 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by varnull:
And M$ customers who are facing exactly that in August when the music servers go offline.
yep anti-consumer is just that but lets hope that the 360 doesn't get Sony'd
Sony'd definition click here
Originally posted by urban dictionary link:
To be totally screwed over without warning.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 7. May 2008 @ 11:46
|
|
