They gave the game a 9.9/10. They rated the lasting appeal a 9.5 with no mention of MGO which comes with the game. Ok, so GTA IV gets a 10 for lasting appeal when their multiplayer sux and takes forever to find people, but MGS gets a 9.5 and it literally has its own multiplayer game?!? Wow, just wow....
well, we dont realy know yet. my grope is really the whole lasting appeal thing. to me its just stupid. seriously, no mention of MGO!?! and GTA IV lasting appeal really does suck. I'm already back on COD 4.
Originally posted by grkblood: well, we dont realy know yet. my grope is really the whole lasting appeal thing. to me its just stupid. seriously, no mention of MGO!?! and GTA IV lasting appeal really does suck. I'm already back on COD 4.
I am also back onto CoD4, kinda annoying really. With all the other GTA games i could play them forever and not get bored, i have kinda with this one though.
Yeah that does actually suck that they gave it 9.5 without talking about online. Their reason for giving 9.5 was repetitive cinematics, idiots...
IGN is not just an 360 supporter, is a Wii and PS3 haters.
I was working to a games magazine once and i still have friends there, the worst commend that i have heard for this game was: why summer?
From what they have told me, the game is something like resident evil for PS1, an evolution, there is nothing like it.
I haven't plaid any of the MGS, i dont like games with guns, i prefer swords and that kind of staff (except Resident Evil), but i will buy this one on release day, the trailer from PSN that closes with an extreme man to man bloody fight, got my attention big time.
