Originally posted by Pop_Smith:

---

This is the problem with the patent system.

As far as I know, you can patent an idea (thats simply what a patent is right?) even if its "futuristic" and sit on the patents. Simply pay a couple thousand a year (if I remember right) and then when you see a bigger company using something that looks to infringe on your 5-10+ year old patent, BAM! Sue them and make your millions.

I may not be right though, I am just thinking that's how it works.

---

Originally posted by BurningAs:

---

This is complete BS. They patented this non-existent device back in 1993 when they only had the idea and nothing else. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parse...RS=PN/5,379,057

Now they turn around and sue companies that actually made it into reality.

---

Quote:

---

This is complete BS. They patented this non-existent device back in 1993 when they only had the idea and nothing else. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parse...RS=PN/5,379,057

Now they turn around and sue companies that actually made it into reality.
AGREEED!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Law needs to change. Patents should mandate AT THE VERY MOST of 6 months before the beginning of a physical development. Screw you if it's your idea........................SHOULDA DONE SOMETHING WITH IT. This truly is the "You snooze, you lose" idea.

FYI............Patents (I believe) have to be maintained to remain current. Can't just patent then sit on it indefinitely.

---