|
DreamSteam signs on to encrypt Blu-ray competitor
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 30 October, 2008
DreamStream has announced they have signed a deal to encrypt Royal Digital Media's new optical media format, a competitor to Blu-ray.
The company uses military strength encryption and says the protection will be used on commercial motion picture discs.
"DreamStream and RDM's technologies align perfectly, as they both rest exponentially beyond the standards currently being employed," ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
|
slickwill
Member
|
30. October 2008 @ 17:42 |
Link to this message
|
Sounds great if the technology become available to the consumer. This could possibly beat blue-ray in the market if the players and discs are cheaper.
Quote:
"The industry's problem, which Sony has been unable to solve with Blu-ray, is how to transition into HD without destroying the existing DVD industry or gouging the pocketbooks of consumers. We have the solution and can solve this without having to drastically overhaul the entire infrastructure of DVD production."
What? How are they suppose to accomplish that, especially when a new movie format is being introduced?
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
CNDLG
Junior Member
|
30. October 2008 @ 18:56 |
Link to this message
|
Too little too late. They'll have to wait another 5-10 years before people are ready for a new format. By the time these discs hit shelves Bluray players and movies will probably be as cheap and common place as regular DVDs are now. Also too many people haven't caught up yet with an HDTV of any kind (720 or 1080). This format is ahead of its time (unless someone wants to tell be where I can get a 1920p TV!?)
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 30. October 2008 @ 18:59
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
30. October 2008 @ 18:59 |
Link to this message
|
This technology is aimed at large screen projection and event displays.
Why the hell would we want "military grade" encryption and drm on our purchased media?.. They aren't going to let us encrypt using it.. just another method to deny fair use.
|
Member
|
30. October 2008 @ 20:03 |
Link to this message
|
|
But the 2048 bit encryption would be a nice fun game for the hackers to break...
|
Member
|
30. October 2008 @ 20:06 |
Link to this message
|
|
Good luck on very & i mean very limited studio support.D.O.A.
|
Junior Member
1 product review
|
30. October 2008 @ 20:31 |
Link to this message
|
I think it's funny that RDM is just DRM jumbled. How can disks of this quality ever penetrate households when the specs outmatch the resolution of currently available TV sets?? Varnull, I don't think the costs of r&d on this will be met if it's only for high red projection and event centers.
|
|
tin23uk
Junior Member
1 product review
|
31. October 2008 @ 01:08 |
Link to this message
|
how much more high def do we need, whats next virtual reality where you can actually be in the movies.
right now i only have a standard def tv, i see a huge difference between it and HD but nothing i lose sleep over, my SDTV is only 32" and one day i plan on going bigger, when i do ill go to 1080p so as i can have a bigger and cleaner picture but to move up to 1920p how big would my tv ned to be to really see a difference between 1080p and 1920p.
true maybe it is only in the works for cinemas but how long will it be before they start trying to convince us we cant live without a definition so high its completely pointless to have in your home unless you have a 400" screen and sit 100ft away from the box.
|
|
langy72
Newbie
|
31. October 2008 @ 10:21 |
Link to this message
|
People seem to be missing the point here entirely. This is actually fantastic news - I find it fascinating how everyone instantly sees this news as "even worse DRM", "ahead of it's time", "good luck getting studio's support".
The article states that the format is CAPABLE of 1920p video. It never stated that this was the only format available. If anything, it'd be nice to know that purchased discs that work with current technology, are going to be usable on future, better techonology - without having to go out and buy yet another new format and replace all of the 'old' discs we've already spent money on [which we've had to do for the transition between DVD and Blu-ray]
To have high-definition movies, at the price of standard definition, that's actually BETTER quality than the current HD media, sounds too good to be true. But if this launches, it soon will be.
Although as NexGen76 said, practically no studio support will mean entering the public sector will be a tough task to achieve - fingers crossed it'll happen though!
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
31. October 2008 @ 10:37 |
Link to this message
|
While I would like to see more specs on the disks it is cool to see that they use red-laser technology, which means it would probably be possible to upgrade existing DVD lines to this, and the storage space is twice that of current (although not the limit of) Blu-ray discs.
The only not so hot thing is the "Military grade encryption". However, if this format picks up steam at all it would be fun to watch Slysoft take a whack at it.
|
|
juankerr
Member
|
31. October 2008 @ 11:25 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Pop_Smith:
The only not so hot thing is the "Military grade encryption". However, if this format picks up steam at all it would be fun to watch Slysoft take a whack at it.
They'll need the help of Frenzy - the Decepticon who hacked into the US military computer system.
|
|
sKrEwZ
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
31. October 2008 @ 13:22 |
Link to this message
|
|
Lol ^^
Some assembly required.
|
Senior Member
|
31. October 2008 @ 17:11 |
Link to this message
|
All it takes is one leak of encryption keys as we had with DVD?s and the protection scheme is a mood point no matter how large resolution wise it is, or that it is considered Military Grade or not. Will the players have a camouflage paint scheme? LOL
Is the larger encryption key passing going to cause performance issues in playing movies?
One nice thing about the red laser is you should have better compatibility with older format DVD?s. It is also nice to have competition in the market however most of you don?t see that and just complain to no end about format wars and what not.
BD is capable of higher resolution as they have the storage capability to facilitate such a need so that is no plus to this new format. I agree with others that it is ?too little, too late? but it might fly in a niche market; I don?t see people running out to get one of these players if they have BD and their TV can?t handle the higher resolution anyway. For high end users though this might be pretty nice especially since they don?t mind dropping thousands of dollars on technology.
|
Junior Member
|
31. October 2008 @ 17:24 |
Link to this message
|
exponentially, huh?
50^x = 100 <-- solve for x
hahaha, sounds like they put more work into developing the DRM technology than the storage capacity. yawn
~Maitland
|
|
hermes_vb
Senior Member
|
1. November 2008 @ 02:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
With all that encryption going on you will probably need a powerful player or a lot of patience because its gonna take a lot of time to start playing the damn thing. You could probably walk the dog, make yourself a sandwich and balance your checkbook while you wait for it to decrypt.
|
|
domie
Member
|
1. November 2008 @ 07:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
the encryption is military style ? oh that's ok then - we can all breathe a sigh of relief and sleep comfortably - the military are 100% secure and alway make the right decisions on everything lol.
|
|
puterman
Junior Member
|
1. November 2008 @ 18:00 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by hermes_vb:
With all that encryption going on you will probably need a powerful player or a lot of patience because its gonna take a lot of time to start playing the damn thing. You could probably walk the dog, make yourself a sandwich and balance your checkbook while you wait for it to decrypt.
Don't forget the retinal and finger print scan you'll need to do before you can watch anything but the 30 minutes of commercials that they'll force you to watch before you get to the main menu.
|
|
salsa36
Member
|
1. November 2008 @ 18:08 |
Link to this message
|
|
Good luck with that!
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
1. November 2008 @ 18:53 |
Link to this message
|
|
2048-bits so what big deal. you still fail if the key cannot change then it's a mute issue.
i would much rather have 256bits and a key that scrambles itself every 6 seconds, besides 2048bit is just the length of the key.
there is no such thing as military grade encryption. as most military documents are contained on a closed network, that and the military fancies credentials more than encryption. like your eye ball, your fingers and micro chip in the back of your helmet.
|
Junior Member
|
1. November 2008 @ 19:36 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by DXR88:
2048-bits so what big deal. you still fail if the key cannot change then it's a mute issue.
i would much rather have 256bits and a key that scrambles itself every 6 seconds, besides 2048bit is just the length of the key.
eh 256 bits can hold aproximately 115792089237316195423570985008690000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 different possible numbers.
whereas 2048 bits can hold approximately 32317006071311007300714876688670000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 different numbers...
the issue is 2048 would be impossible to crack by brute force because of the sheer amount of possible values involved. it would take a lot of computers a really loong time to crack just one code...
Quote:
there is no such thing as military grade encryption. as most military documents are contained on a closed network, that and the military fancies credentials more than encryption. like your eye ball, your fingers and micro chip in the back of your helmet.
lol
edited by DVDback23- the number you posted was demolishing the pages' margins haha
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 2. November 2008 @ 23:08
|
Senior Member
|
3. November 2008 @ 13:39 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
"The retail prices for RDM's players and discs are expected to equal those of the traditional DVD format, greatly undercutting Blu-ray," said Diebel.
Don't know, don't care about whatever encryption they want to try to use... If they make a player/recorder at current DVD player/recorder prices that can burn 100gigs on a disk that costs .50 cents then BR disks get filed with those LP sized "laser" disks of the 80's!
|
|
hermes_vb
Senior Member
|
3. November 2008 @ 14:37 |
Link to this message
|
The fundamental flaw of all these encryption schemes is that in order to be played, the keys need to be stored on the player thus making reverse engineering possible (eventually). Outside the DVD world, the keys for an encrypted content are known only by the person who encrypted the material and the few people for whom it is intended. When you mass market something like that, someone is going to make a mistake. Maybe a chunk of bad written code in a software player can be exploited thus revealing the keys. Remember the WinDVD DVD-Audio hack. In other words you will always have the possibility of betrayal from wihtin (metaphorically speaking).
|
Junior Member
|
3. November 2008 @ 23:01 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Don't know, don't care about whatever encryption they want to try to use... If they make a player/recorder at current DVD player/recorder prices that can burn 100gigs on a disk that costs .50 cents then BR disks get filed with those LP sized "laser" disks of the 80's!
Hey, c'mon now! Laser discs were pretty cool! In Japan they had HD laserdiscs that did 1080i back in 1991 or so! ...they just never got very popular
~Maitland
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
4. November 2008 @ 00:08 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Hey, c'mon now! Laser discs were pretty cool! In Japan they had HD laserdiscs that did 1080i back in 1991 or so! ...they just never got very popular
~Maitland
Your right they where cool, they flew rather nicely especially after lazerrot.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Junior Member
|
4. November 2008 @ 00:56 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Quote:
Hey, c'mon now! Laser discs were pretty cool! In Japan they had HD laserdiscs that did 1080i back in 1991 or so! ...they just never got very popular
~Maitland
Your right they where cool, they flew rather nicely especially after lazerrot.
haha right and you could shoot them out of the air like clay pigeons! lol
|
