|
In-Stat predicts 802.11n will dominate HD market
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 29 April, 2009
According to an upcoming report from In-Stat, the next generation of Wi-Fi standard, 802.11n, will dominate the HD market. Wireless Home Digital Interface (WHDI), WirelessHD, and Ultrawideband (UWB) are contenders for wireless High-definition delivery systems within the home. However, In-Stat comments that "the ubiquity of Wi-Fi technology is proving unstoppable."
"802.11n is the next ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
29. April 2009 @ 22:45 |
Link to this message
|
Floridian predicts Copper wire will dominate HD Market.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
CNDLG
Junior Member
|
29. April 2009 @ 23:30 |
Link to this message
|
|
Why is it 'draft' N ?
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
30. April 2009 @ 01:56 |
Link to this message
|
|
Draft N is Faster Than N.
|
Moderator
|
30. April 2009 @ 06:09 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by CNDLG:
Why is it 'draft' N ?
Because it's been 'in draft' since Victorian times, and is still a few years away from ever being 'ratified' ie becoming a proper standard; (a few years away from ratification as far as i've read anyways).
Main PC ~ Intel C2Q Q6600 (G0 Stepping)/Gigabyte GA-EP45-DS3/2GB Crucial Ballistix PC2-8500/Zalman CNPS9700/Antec 900/Corsair HX 620W
Network ~ DD-WRT ~ 2node WDS-WPA2/AES ~ Buffalo WHR-G54S. 3node WPA2/AES ~ WRT54GS v6 (inc. WEP BSSID), WRT54G v2, WRT54G2 v1. *** Forum Rules *** |
|
emugamer
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
30. April 2009 @ 08:09 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by DXR88:
Draft N is Faster Than N.
It's so fast, you can feel the draft as it wooshes by.
|
Member
12 product reviews
|
30. April 2009 @ 09:49 |
Link to this message
|
I already have a wireless 802.11n router from Linksys, but as has been stated, it is not standardized.
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
30. April 2009 @ 12:45 |
Link to this message
|
Pre-N is what the standardization are based around.
but yeah its not standardized yet, it was going to be standardized in 07 then in 08 yet were still waiting.
wonder why, maybe we haven't put that nice video chip in there you know the one you cant view your own content while streaming across your own network to more than one device on your network.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 30. April 2009 @ 12:45
|
Senior Member
3 product reviews
|
30. April 2009 @ 16:40 |
Link to this message
|
|
I've got a draft N network at my place, the router is great but the adaptors have TONS of issues.
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
30. April 2009 @ 17:51 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by canuckerz:
I've got a draft N network at my place, the router is great but the adaptors have TONS of issues.
your router wouldn't happen to be a linksys would it?
Linksys doesn't play nice with Belkin and Netgear.
|
|
mpegcodec
Newbie
|
30. April 2009 @ 20:48 |
Link to this message
|
WiFi for streaming HD video = no quality of service, no ischronous delivery, best effort CSMA/TDMA protocol, and way under 100 Mbs data rate. This has been attempted for the last 6 years, and even the very controlled demos at CES in Vegas failed when placed in the WiFi rich LVCC! The quoted source is not correct in either a technical or marketing sense. IEEE 802.11n will publish as a standard in 2009, but it cannot reliably stream more than a single channel of HD content, and even that must be in a relatively pristine RF environment. IEEE 802.15.3c, better known as WirelessHD or under other names, is based on the 60 GHz spectrum, supports native 5 Gbps + data rates, has full quality of service, operates peer to peer (no access point like 802.11) and thus, can stream a single uncompressed 1808p HD signal. IEEE 802.11n can stream 100 Mbps, but that's through an access point, using a best effort Ethernet like packet transport, and will NEVER dominate this market. The InStat folks are notoriously inaccurate in their "say what the investment industry wants to hear," paid for industry reports. Don't waste your hard earned money on an 802.11n video solution. None of them work, and all of them are significant compromises relative to a simple HDMI cable.
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
30. April 2009 @ 21:18 |
Link to this message
|
Draft N and Pre N are capable of 300Mb so id give it about 150~200Mb in an interfering environment.
even 802.11G can sustain 130Mb using the advance features such as Multi-in/Multi-Out.
then again nothing beats the Cat6e, so just install it inside your house.
|
Senior Member
3 product reviews
|
1. May 2009 @ 01:05 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by canuckerz:
I've got a draft N network at my place, the router is great but the adaptors have TONS of issues.
your router wouldn't happen to be a linksys would it?
Linksys doesn't play nice with Belkin and Netgear.
All D-link.
|
|
ooZEROoo
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
1. May 2009 @ 12:45 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by canuckerz:
I've got a draft N network at my place, the router is great but the adaptors have TONS of issues.
The adapters have issues because the IEEE has not standardized 802.11n as stated multiple times above. I think the reason being that it is not standard is because of these adapter issues. You buy a Cisco (Linksys) 802.11n router, but you buy a Belkin 802.11n PCI card chances are that you are going to have more problems then you ever wanted. I personally will stick with 802.11g until this is ratified. What happens if 802.11N is never ratified, then we are pretty much screwed.
|
|
Morreale
Senior Member
|
1. May 2009 @ 17:21 |
Link to this message
|
I have a Linksys WRT300N and my iMac supports Wireless-N and it has no issues... The only problem my router gives me is with my PS3, I try to play online and it won't connect to the servers because I'm also downloading torrents on one of my computers. But that has nothing to do with Wireless-N I guess lol
|
|
cart0181
Member
|
4. May 2009 @ 00:02 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by DXR88:
Draft N and Pre N are capable of 300Mb so id give it about 150~200Mb in an interfering environment.
even 802.11G can sustain 130Mb using the advance features such as Multi-in/Multi-Out.
then again nothing beats the Cat6e, so just install it inside your house.
What about just using fiber optic cable inside your house?
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
4. May 2009 @ 04:16 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DXR88:
Draft N and Pre N are capable of 300Mb so id give it about 150~200Mb in an interfering environment.
even 802.11G can sustain 130Mb using the advance features such as Multi-in/Multi-Out.
then again nothing beats the Cat6e, so just install it inside your house.
What about just using fiber optic cable inside your house?
Cat6e is cheap and abundant and its rated for Gigabit networking.
Fiber Optic would be expensive and useless as a LAN Medium for more than one reason. unless you have $5000.00 to spend for a Fiber Switch,Fiber Optic cards, a good set of SCSI HDD's to keep up with the
flow of data, not to mention the good $1000 dollars a month for all that bandwidth.
im sure it was sarcasm.
|
|
iKronic
Newbie
|
5. May 2009 @ 15:40 |
Link to this message
|
|
I don't get how "draft N" is faster than "N"..?
Could you guys please explain this to me.. I have a macbook and I have N - which I heard was the fastest wireless available..?
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
5. May 2009 @ 18:31 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by iKronic:
I don't get how "draft N" is faster than "N"..?
Could you guys please explain this to me.. I have a macbook and I have N - which I heard was the fastest wireless available..?
N is the fastest
there where two N's. there was the Draft N which is now Defunct
and Pre-N which is the based on current standards
Draft N was about 50Mb faster than current Pre N. Pre N is much more compatible than Draft N.
ether way N is the fastest Wireless to date.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
cart0181
Member
|
14. May 2009 @ 23:13 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by iKronic:
I don't get how "draft N" is faster than "N"..?
Could you guys please explain this to me.. I have a macbook and I have N - which I heard was the fastest wireless available..?
N is the fastest
there where two N's. there was the Draft N which is now Defunct
and Pre-N which is the based on current standards
Draft N was about 50Mb faster than current Pre N. Pre N is much more compatible than Draft N.
ether way N is the fastest Wireless to date.
Yes, and of course, as soon as it is fully ratified, there will only be one 802.11n.
DXR88, I wasn't being facetious when I spoke of in-home fiber-optic. I'm just planning for the future. These technologies may be impractical now, but just as anything else does, prices will fall. Fiber is to-the-curb in many communities already, so bringing it indoors is a logical next step. I realize it may be some time before this happens, or it may never happen. Perhaps something else will replace it. Until then, I've "wired" my house with a pull-string behind each wall-plate so I'll be ready.
|
