User User name Password  
   
Friday 19.9.2025 / 14:04
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > announcements > news comments > nin iphone application gets rejected
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
NIN iPhone application gets rejected
  Jump to:
 
The following comments relate to this news article:

NIN iPhone application gets rejected

article published on 4 May, 2009

Trent Reznor, front man for Nine Inch Nails, has spoken out against the arbitrary Apple App Store approval process, after his application submission was rejected. As posted on his personal blog, the rejection letter was as follows: "Thank you for submitting nin: access to the App Store. We've reviewed nin: access and determined that we cannot post this version of your iPhone application ... [ read the full article ]

Please read the original article before posting your comments.
Posted Message
AfterDawn Addict

1 product review
_
6. May 2009 @ 05:46 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Quote:
Quote:
Originally posted by chicnshit:
the only bill they don't have is the bill that mandates what toilet paper the American people wipe there ass with.
Actualy, there is a law against growing hemp...
Advertisement
_
__
Newbie
_
6. May 2009 @ 10:28 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
What the heck?
You are in america! You should be used to the fact that [removed] or [removed] is pretty much a comma in our vocabulary.


Edit ~ Oner: While I do understand your point there are still rules of which need to be abided by here @ aD

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. May 2009 @ 20:32

chicnshit
Newbie
_
6. May 2009 @ 11:42 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
They should have some warning lable like the parental advisory or a warning that there may be some swear words when you download your app. This issue is similair to when there were small companies trying to change hollywood movies when someone wanted heir movie edited from someone in the movie either naked or saying afew cus words.I don't think that it it is right for walmart to do that.But walmart will strong arm prices or anything else to sell someones product.
Moderator

16 product reviews
_
6. May 2009 @ 20:29 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by KillerBug:
Originally posted by chicnshit:
the only bill they don't have is the bill that mandates what toilet paper the American people wipe there ass with.
Actualy, there is a law against growing hemp...
Yet it was against the law to NOT grow hemp in America at one time ~

Quote:
The first hemp laws in America were passed in 1619 and they were 'must grow' laws. If you were a farmer living in America and you didn't grow hemp, you would be jailed or kicked out of the country as a non patriot. These first laws were put in place by the Colonist Government of Great Britain. In 1773 and again in 1776, ( the year the Declaration of Independence was signed). American made their own must grow laws. At that time, it was one of the most widely used plants in the world.

Fact - Cannabis hemp was legal tender (money) in most of America from 1631 until the early 1800s. Thomas Jefferson risked his life bring hemp seeds to America from overseas. Benjamin Franklin, started the first paper mill in America and all of the paper was made out of hemp. Wars were fought over hemp and without it, America never would have won the Revolutionary war.

In the 1920's during alcohol prohibition, almost every newspaper in the country was running ads for smoking hemp and hash ( a hemp by product ) the only legal high left. The fact is, hemp was in 80% of all human medicines when it was made illegal.


The first law against hemp was passed in 1937. This law was totally unconstitutional, but it took until 1968 for the Supreme court to agree that it was unconstitutional. In 1970-1972 American tax dollars paid to find out what to do about the hemp laws. Experts came back to president Nixon with this: Hemp is non-addictive, it is not a stepping stone to harder drugs, in fact it should not be in any drug category at all. They said there was nothing bad or dangerous about using hemp.

Nixon didn't like hemp and went against what the experts told him and pushed to have laws passed against it on the grounds that it has no medicinal value. This of course is untrue as most doctors would tell you. Well, some might not tell you because the way the laws are now, fear of persecution keeps many of the ones that know the facts quiet. A doctor told me that doctors can lose their license if they tell you that hemp would help you.

In the same year 1972, Holland had experts do research on the hemp plant as well. You see at the time Holland and the U.S.A. had about the same amount of hemp use per capita. Their experts said the same thing. Holland listened to their experts and made it legal.

Now, Holland has about half the hemp use per capita as the U.S. does. So why is this ? The answer to this was given to us with alcohol prohibition. What we found out then was this... usage goes up when you make a substance illegal. With alcohol, usage historically went back down when it was made legal again. so what can we gather from this ? It looks like Americans, proud citizens of the land of the free and the home of the brave, don't like it when you try to take their freedoms away.

In 1988, two million more of our tax dollars went to the U.S. army to do an in depth study on hemp. Their findings were that it should not be illegal at all etc.. The Reagan Bush administration was hoping for findings that the plant was bad in some way, but that is not the case or what the experts said, once again. This wasn't in the news much because they did their best to keep the American people from knowing the truth. So why don't they want you to know the truth ?

Because the United States Government is making billions of dollars by keeping it illegal.

Now some of you might be thinking, where do you get off calling federal drug laws unconstitutional ? To that I say... read your Constitution! Drugs would be a state issue, not a federal one the way our constitution is written. That is why it took about 20 years to figure out what to do with the first drug problems in the country. The first drug problem we faced as a nation was poppy and coca plant extracts like opium, cocaine, morphine, etc.. You see in 1900, you could walk in to almost any drug store and buy these drugs over the counter. Trade embargos is how they tried to fix the problem at first, because our Government knew they didn't have the Constitutional right to make laws against drugs.

I think it is too bad our government decided to break the law of our land, our Constitution of the United States, instead of trying honest education once they learned that those drugs were addictive. To this day our Government is still making schools teach lies about drugs instead of what they know to be the truth. This truly is a sad point in American history!

Source

Now I cannot confirm, say nor would agree with everything I quoted above, but the fact is it WAS legal for the purposes of growing (to coin a term) the country's expansion, infrastructure, cultivation of the lands etc. etc. etc.

But whatever...just don't get me started on our rights to bear arms and how utter BS how supposed "patriotic" people support some Constitutional rights but not others when they should uphold ALL.

AfterDawn Addict

1 product review
_
6. May 2009 @ 22:27 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I really don't know the reasoning behind hemp being illegal to cultivate, but I really don't see what's got to do with marijuana- except for the fact that both are from the same family. I have helped harvesting hemp back home(Europe) since I was in fifth grade, and from what I know, it is still grown to this day.

As for the idiots at Apple, I guess the NIN application must've been truly offensive, if it didn't move past the censorship that even the "Shaking Baby" did.Right.

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 6. May 2009 @ 22:43

SoulGLOW
Member
_
7. May 2009 @ 02:32 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
well said Oner. i epecially like your last paragraph. You & I have to fight for all our rights or they will slowly be eroded away. These bastards even have us thinking we need a license to drive our personal vehicles & have to have insurance. if it isnt Commercial the Govt cant regulate it. period
AfterDawn Addict

4 product reviews
_
7. May 2009 @ 02:56 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by SoulGLOW:
well said Oner. i epecially like your last paragraph. You & I have to fight for all our rights or they will slowly be eroded away. These bastards even have us thinking we need a license to drive our personal vehicles & have to have insurance. if it isnt Commercial the Govt cant regulate it. period
The more rules and laws forced upon us the less rights and freedoms we have....
AfterDawn Addict

1 product review
_
7. May 2009 @ 06:03 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by cyprusrom:
I really don't know the reasoning behind hemp being illegal to cultivate, but I really don't see what's got to do with marijuana- except for the fact that both are from the same family. I have helped harvesting hemp back home(Europe) since I was in fifth grade, and from what I know, it is still grown to this day.
The best I can tell the anti-hemp laws were put into effect to bennifit logging and cotton industries, as hemp is cheaper and more resiliant for both clothing and paper. (Also more eco-friendly, but no one cared about that back then). The effect today is that hemp products cost more than cotton and tree products because they are subject to tarrifs and shipping from other countries. There is almost no connection between marijuana and hemp; a joint contains more THC than a truckload of hemp, making hemp useless for intoxication, even with refinment. The wierd part of this law is that you can sell hemp...you just can't grow it.


This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 7. May 2009 @ 06:11

Moderator

16 product reviews
_
7. May 2009 @ 08:03 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by SoulGLOW:
well said Oner. i epecially like your last paragraph. You & I have to fight for all our rights or they will slowly be eroded away. These bastards even have us thinking we need a license to drive our personal vehicles & have to have insurance. if it isnt Commercial the Govt cant regulate it. period
TY Soul, but I don't want to come off highly experienced or a well versed person in this particular area of discussion. Though I am surprised to see someone else who knows this particular item (in red). Personally I wouldn't want the no insurance thing as I don't want to have to be responsible for someone else's accident etc. but ultimately I do agree with you ~ If it isn't Commercial the Government cannot regulate it. Although it would then be the States area to enforce/create laws at that point anyway correct?

Member
_
7. May 2009 @ 15:27 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Wait a minute.... Apple rejected software from Nine inch nails because of the content.... but it alowed the download of their Shake the baby software cuz it was kewl give me a break Im sooooooo glad I have a Black Berry Storm I can download all my apps and do everything the I phone can and not be held to the corperate monoply that Apple has on all those who have fallen into their trap... sorry for those who bought it cuz it was kewl but better phones are on their way and soon everyone will figure it out if we slow down our apple opsetion the they will have to lower the price on all their toys to sell them...
AfterDawn Addict

1 product review
_
8. May 2009 @ 01:11 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Finaly, back to the topic at hand. This is why I can't wait for a good Android device, if I want a game where you do nothing but buy drugs and kill hookers, I should be able to get it. I am an adult!


Moderator

16 product reviews
_
8. May 2009 @ 08:35 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
To be fair KB you did partake in the hemp discussion too...unless you forgot because of an "impairment" due to a derivative of hemp ;) but you are right back to the topic ~

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 8. May 2009 @ 08:36

alexeemo
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
8. May 2009 @ 14:24 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I'm so sick and tired of companies like Apple telling me what I can do with a product I bought and paid for. It's my stinkin iphone, my ipod! It's all about control
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
Donnyp
Newbie
_
16. May 2009 @ 02:15 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Truly. A king Among Men. Trent. I salute you.
 
afterdawn.com > forums > announcements > news comments > nin iphone application gets rejected
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork