|
Microsoft to offer Windows 7 on USB drives?
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 27 June, 2009
Citing the increase in netbooks now on the market, most of which do not include optical drives, a source within Microsoft, speaking to CNET, says the software giant is considering offering the upcoming OS Windows 7 on USB flash drives.
It is unknown what kind of copy protection would be put on these drives, outside of the standard CD key, but it may not even matter.
Microsoft is also ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
Member
|
27. June 2009 @ 23:48 |
Link to this message
|
They already have 16GB USB drives, just wait for those prices to go down or something to use them.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
|
SProdigy
Senior Member
5 product reviews
|
28. June 2009 @ 00:43 |
Link to this message
|
There is a way of using a Windows XP CD to create a Windows XP USB installation on a 1gb or larger drive. It was a lot of hassle, but worked on a laptop I had that does not have an optical drive.
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
28. June 2009 @ 00:50 |
Link to this message
|
Well I guess people who get it in this format will find it a lot easier to install where it really should be installed than trying to shove a dvd up there *giggles*
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
28. June 2009 @ 01:29 |
Link to this message
|
if netbook user where smart they would rip the windose DVD to a bootable thumbdrive, its been done since the days of dos. Setup.exe people its there for a reason.
Powered By
 This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 28. June 2009 @ 01:31
|
Newbie
|
28. June 2009 @ 01:35 |
Link to this message
|
|
@varnull: That was an awesome comment!
|
|
OzMick
Suspended permanently
|
28. June 2009 @ 02:43 |
Link to this message
|
Yawn, Linux has been capable of installing to/from USB for years. Remember this is just an install disc, still not able to install *to* USB without a ton of messing around. Microsoft just playing catch-up and failing yet again.
|
Member
|
28. June 2009 @ 04:41 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by OzMick:
Yawn, Linux has been capable of installing to/from USB for years. Remember this is just an install disc, still not able to install *to* USB without a ton of messing around. Microsoft just playing catch-up and failing yet again.
I love pointing out the linux origins of most things in windows and mac osx to people. Look at beryl or compiz for ubuntu and see what windows 8 and the next cat will have for visual appeal. My desktop rains when it is rainy outside and snows when it is snowy outside. Nothing but linux can offer that.
|
|
domie
Member
|
28. June 2009 @ 05:47 |
Link to this message
|
I would think an external dvd rom drive would work just as well but is there a netbook on the market capable of taking windows 7 ?
Most of them struggle with XP and the majority use some form of Linux which seems to suit them down to the ground - they are amazingly fast with Linux but splutter choke and crawl with Windows XP.
So long as the majority of these machines are chained by the processor ( either celeron 900 MHz or intel atom 1.6 GHZ at the moment ) - they won't be able to use anything more demanding than linux and still be able to perform well.
|
Member
|
28. June 2009 @ 12:27 |
Link to this message
|
Just wanted to cite a couple errors with the article, there isn't any copy protection on the CDs and DVDs available right now. So there isn't going to be any difference with a USB Drive. The drives would cost Microsoft more but not by much, as only a ~4GB one is needed not 10GB as the .iso should only be around 3.5GB... 10GB is referring to the uncompressed fully installed size of the installation...
|
|
manager2
Suspended permanently
|
28. June 2009 @ 15:31 |
Link to this message
|
|
Getting Windows 7 installed on Netbooks will not be an issue.
Windows 7 is available now. PRE-ORDER AND SAVE BIG
SPAM removed
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 28. June 2009 @ 20:10
|
|
varnull
Suspended permanently
|
28. June 2009 @ 16:05 |
Link to this message
|
where the sun don't shine is the best place for this turkey.. mark my words. I'm reading the responses from real testers who are looking at the drm and spyware contained but as yet turned off.. already explorer has been exploited and th entire OS is just going to be another malware supporting lump of garbage. NO applications should ever run with higher than administrator lever privileges. Lesson learned in unix world oh when.. mid 60's?
When you buy something that is subject to activation you have bought nothing at all - Richard Stallman ??
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
28. June 2009 @ 17:13 |
Link to this message
|
|
Windows = Not *nix.
they both have there advantages and they both have there disadvantages.
|
AfterDawn Addict
6 product reviews
|
28. June 2009 @ 19:09 |
Link to this message
|
The other reason why Microsoft could be doing this is because Linux the free open source Operating System has already done this kinda think in creating bootable usb flash drives that allow the user to install or even run off the flash drive itself and this means the market share of Linux maybe increasing and Microsoft may start feeling the heat.
They need to increase the speed of the file transfer for this kinda thing cause it may take longer to install the Operating System.
|
|
P51ride
Newbie
|
28. June 2009 @ 23:32 |
Link to this message
|
Windows XP will perform better if the graphics fade in-out and shadowing are turned off. I know that there are other tweaks to make XP run faster on netbooks. My current computer is an Athlon XP 2500 with 1 gig of RAM running XP. I am not a gamer and funds are always short so I'm thankful that I have this comp and three or four others of lower performance.
Best regards to those on the forum.
|
Junior Member
|
2. July 2009 @ 11:58 |
Link to this message
|
I have been installing Windows from USB drives for years. Everything from 2000, XP, Vista, Windows 7, Windows Home Server, Server 2008, etc...As long as you know what to do, it is not hard. Oh, and as far as having your computer show you the weather, that can be done with Windows as well...
|
|
OFI
Newbie
|
2. July 2009 @ 13:02 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by engage16:
The drives would cost Microsoft more but not by much, as only a ~4GB one is needed not 10GB as the .iso should only be around 3.5GB... 10GB is referring to the uncompressed fully installed size of the installation...
That 10GB quote is nonsense anyway. I've installed Windows 7 on less than 8.5GB.
Originally posted by domie:
I would think an external dvd rom drive would work just as well but is there a netbook on the market capable of taking windows 7 ?
Most of them struggle with XP and the majority use some form of Linux which seems to suit them down to the ground.
There is a poor mans version of Win 7 coming out intended for netbooks as it has lots of stuff stripped out.
Regardless my dad has run both XP and Vista on his early EEEPC and it runs fine. Obviously not as fast as a modern desktop or laptop but disable most of the effects and it's fine.
|
Junior Member
|
2. July 2009 @ 14:36 |
Link to this message
|
The Windows 7 Starter edition is supposed to be taking over for XP for netbooks, according to Microsoft. And versions of the betas and RC have been installed on various netbooks.
|
|
wazzat
Junior Member
|
3. July 2009 @ 09:25 |
Link to this message
|
Here it goes again. Unsupported hardware and applications. Buy more tools to continue working. More service packs, .Net updates, bloat. I'm not giving up my old PC games. And not converting to Buray until I have to. Purchasing new AV protection is enough of an expense every year. And if MS buys usb drives in quantity WHOLESALE they'll be cheap for them.
|
|
wazzat
Junior Member
|
3. July 2009 @ 09:36 |
Link to this message
|
|
Since noone mentioned the method here wouldn't you create an .iso image of the OS and copy it to the drive?
|
|
wazzat
Junior Member
|
3. July 2009 @ 09:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
And I'm not employed by them, but if you want to keep up with Windoz news Updates solutions you should browse Windows Secrets free or cheap editions newsletters webpages. They're not affiliated with MS. One editor was with Ziff Davis many years. They sure contribute their help to computer users. They'll post the good points bugs and fixes.
|
|
leglessoz
Junior Member
|
5. July 2009 @ 01:22 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by DXR88:
Windows = Not *nix.
they both have there advantages and they both have there disadvantages.
it's THEIR not THERE (both times)
|
|
leglessoz
Junior Member
|
5. July 2009 @ 01:31 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by ROMaster2:
They already have 16GB USB drives, just wait for those prices to go down or something to use them.
Actually 64GB drives are available. 16GB drives are quite cheap now though. Still much more expensive than a DVD.
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
5. July 2009 @ 02:42 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DXR88:
Windows = Not *nix.
they both have there advantages and they both have there disadvantages.
it's THEIR not THERE (both times)
congratulations. have a smiley Sticker for your wonderful correcting abilities. What would we do without you.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 5. July 2009 @ 02:43
|
|
chrissd
Newbie
|
5. July 2009 @ 04:13 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by varnull:
where the sun don't shine is the best place for this turkey.. mark my words. I'm reading the responses from real testers who are looking at the drm and spyware contained but as yet turned off.. already explorer has been exploited and th entire OS is just going to be another malware supporting lump of garbage. NO applications should ever run with higher than administrator lever privileges. Lesson learned in unix world oh when.. mid 60's?
When you buy something that is subject to activation you have bought nothing at all - Richard Stallman ??
Lighten up. :P
Testers as in Beta testers? Seriously.. You have really got it in for Windows if you mark them based on a beta. :P The RC is awesome btw. It's pretty, works well.. Runs like XP but with the gfx of Vista. Better than Vista actually. Quite nice. Seeing as how you usually refer to *nix, and just said Originally posted by varnull:
malware supporting lump of garbage
, take a look at Apple and Firefox for a sec. :P
Firefox was better than IE up to IE6, IE7 came out and made it look bad, IE8 leaves FF way behind. Now my browsers are either Opera or IE8. Safari was also good but that one auto loads and runs .DMG files silently. No user interaction required. And that's just lame. Firefox was meant to replace "a bloated heap of junk". What is it now? :P
Apple is based off Unix, Darwin to be precise, so it's gotta be pretty good by your standards, right? It's got more flaws in it than Windows ME pre service pack. :P Especially now that the iPhone has made it a popular attack vector.
Originally posted by varnull:
NO applications should ever run with higher than administrator lever privileges. Lesson learned in unix world oh when.. mid 60's?
As XKCD puts it so well, sudo make me a sandwhich. :P An extremely large amount of flaws have come out of Unix because of that command. Su and sudo. And why are they in there? Because sometimes we want programs to run with privileges so it can write to a protected spot without us babysitting it. Why it has to write to that spot is another matter all together. But given how lax standards everything in IT have been up till recently, you're going to run into the need to run that command a few times.
Windows does enforce lower level privileges btw, look at Vista. :P Everyone hated it because "cancel or allow" kept coming up. Best bet is to yell at devs for taking the lazy option and needing higher lvl privileges rather than yell at the company for making an OS that allowed them too.
I always love your comments. So unashamedly biased and lacking precise knowledge.. Almost as good as arguing with Apple fanbois. :P Or MSFT ones. Apple is more fun though.
Originally posted by borhan9:
The other reason why Microsoft could be doing this is because Linux the free open source Operating System has already done this kinda think in creating bootable usb flash drives that allow the user to install or even run off the flash drive itself and this means the market share of Linux maybe increasing and Microsoft may start feeling the heat.
They need to increase the speed of the file transfer for this kinda thing cause it may take longer to install the Operating System.
No, as has been pointed out, if people wanted to they could quite easily convert a dvd/cd install to a usb drive. Before netbooks there was simply no need for MSFT to release their products on USB. Most computers also couldn't boot from UBS. I know, a usb optical drive or stick is listed as bootable from but most computers I've used have had odd eccentricies booting from one. Now that computers with no opitcal drives are becoming popular, it's a logical step to release an OS on a usb stick. Keeps MSFT in the market.
Fully agree with second point though. Different between sata and usb is huge.
Originally posted by leglessoz:
Actually 64GB drives are available. 16GB drives are quite cheap now though. Still much more expensive than a DVD.
More storage on a 16gb stick though and fits in your pocket. 8GB drives are only ~$15-20 for a verbatim one. Cheap and awesome. Means I can now transfer ISOs without burning them. :D And carry around 4 OS's tuned for whatever I want. USB sticksa are fun.. lol
Originally posted by DXR88:
congratulations. have a smiley Sticker for your wonderful correcting abilities. What would we do without you.
Haha. That was awesome.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
wazzat
Junior Member
|
5. July 2009 @ 09:07 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Hi. I wanted to let you know that WindowsSecrets.com was
unavailable on July 3 and the early part of July 4. A
serious electrical fire shut down the Web hosting company
in Seattle that we and hundreds of other sites rely on.
Windows Secrets came back online at approximately 9:15 a.m.
Pacific Time July 4. Before then, if you tried to look up
an article or click a link in an old e-mail newsletter, it
would have failed. I apologize for the inconvenience.
Please try it again, and everything should work now.
My staff and I can assure you that no information was lost
and your subscription to the Windows Secrets Newsletter
should continue exactly as before. However, we'd like you
to check your preferences page and make sure all your
fields have correct data. Please use the following link:
It is ESPECIALLY important that you enter an alternate
e-mail address. This is your own personal "disaster
recovery" plan. Companies change their filtering policies
every day, and sometimes readers stop getting the
newsletters they've subscribed to or paid for. When we
receive a bounce notification, we send a short alert to
your alternate address. This is the ONLY use we make of
this information, and many people have thanked us for
informing them of a problem affecting their inbound mail.
Our own disaster-recovery plan consisted simply of
switching to a maintenance server, which displayed a
message about the hosting company's fire. As a small
gaggle of writers, we found the cost of buying and
synchronizing two servers in separate data centers too
great. Instead, we chose to locate our equipment at a
"hardened" data center, with dual diesel generators that
could power the hardware indefinitely in case of any power
outage.
When the blaze started, however, fire marshals ordered the
evaculation of the entire building, and the generators
could not be run. This knocked out some very big Web
sites, not just our own. Authorize.net, one of the world's
largest credit-card gateways, couldn't process transactions
online for its 238,000 clients for about 12 hours. Bing
Travel (a component of Microsoft's new Bing search engine)
was dark for even longer.
I'll tell you more about the fire and our recovery efforts
in next Thursday's regular newsletter. The good news is we
began a transition back in January 2009, when we spun up a
server "in the cloud" to test the benefits. We plan to
move WindowsSecrets.com to cloud computing within one year.
When that happens, we'll have hot-failover capability
across data centers, which should keep our site up even if
one center completely loses power or connectivity.
As far as we can tell, all of our services are back to
normal. Please take a minute to visit WindowsSecrets.com
and do a search, check our polls, or read a review.
There's no need for you to reply to this e-mail. But if
you find any corner of our site that isn't working
normally, please use the contact page to let me know.
Thanks!
Brian Livingston
Yes I recommend Windows Secrets and I tried to access the site at that time while repairing a friend's system.
|
