|
CEOP: Child abuse on P2P must be addressed
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 7 September, 2009
According to the Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre (CEOP), the vast majority of pedophile activity on the Internet now takes place on public and private P2P networks. Additionally, offenders have become more aware of how law enforcement can track them down, and are exploiting technology made to protect privacy in order to avoid being identified.
"Our focus must now be on ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
|
Interestx
Senior Member
|
7. September 2009 @ 10:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
As has been said for quite some time, the groups that would end up benefitting most from the RIAA/MPAA lunacy on file-sharing would be terrorists and paedos.
'Piracy' and file-sharing (not the same thing IMO) was always going to be barely effected, because of the enormous numbers involved doing it across the entire globe.
Well done guys, you helped create a vast 'dark net' and all because you wanted to grasp at every possible cent, no matter how ludicrously futile, costly or harmful the effort ultimately turned out to be.
No doubt there'll also be a little sprinkling of the 'file sharing just helps fund/sustain/maintain terrorists & paedos' stuff thrown in on this but, in the end, this is all the perfectly foreseeable consequence of the insane policies of the 'entertainment industry'.
(only one of the already most profitable businesses on the planet)
Thanks guys, hope you thought it was all worth it.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 7. September 2009 @ 10:26
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
7. September 2009 @ 11:46 |
Link to this message
|
|
No it dose not need to be dealt with as anything can be seen as child porn these days, ergo the FBI and law enforcement needs to make it easier to report and send in information, but then again you would be labeled a predator if you did since you saw that "information" you are reporting.
|
Staff Member
|
7. September 2009 @ 12:11 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by ZippyDSM:
No it dose not need to be dealt with as anything can be seen as child porn these days, ergo the FBI and law enforcement needs to make it easier to report and send in information, but then again you would be labeled a predator if you did since you saw that "information" you are reporting.
You are right to a degree ye, the reason they don't get many public reports about this content on P2P networks is unless they look for it, they won't find it. There were a couple of cases where people posted on aD though that they were downloading porn from P2P and found something illegal in their downloads, and didn't know what to do about it.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
7. September 2009 @ 12:16 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by ZippyDSM:
No it dose not need to be dealt with as anything can be seen as child porn these days, ergo the FBI and law enforcement needs to make it easier to report and send in information, but then again you would be labeled a predator if you did since you saw that "information" you are reporting.
You are right to a degree ye, the reason they don't get many public reports about this content on P2P networks is unless they look for it, they won't find it. There were a couple of cases where people posted on aD though that they were downloading porn from P2P and found something illegal in their downloads, and didn't know what to do about it.
Well it would help if they advertised about it and made it easy to report it, it would also be nice if those that report are protected from prosecution unless they are the originator of the files in question.
The public needs to know how to report it, they need to make reporting it easier and there needs to be some protection for those that report it because of how quickly things can degenerate...
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
7. September 2009 @ 17:28 |
Link to this message
|
you smell that its the smell of the RIAA marching to the DOJ, you can see the stench coming of in waves.
as for Child porn its a morality issue, so to say if i had a daughter and i found out about it you could bet your ass you would never make it to prison.
|
|
windsong
Member
1 product review
|
7. September 2009 @ 17:54 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by DXR88:
you smell that its the smell of the RIAA marching to the DOJ, you can see the stench coming of in waves.
as for Child porn its a morality issue, so to say if i had a daughter and i found out about it you could bet your ass you would never make it to prison.
Well since you don't have a daughter, my guess is that they won't have a problem with you, no?
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
7. September 2009 @ 18:04 |
Link to this message
|
|
Windsong
So you are ok with a tiered net setup so the system can see everything you have fine teens with questionable photos of themselves as sex predators and parents that dare to take cute funny and silly nude photos of their kids to jail as child pornographers.
Most illegal things are already illegal to add restrictions and "but'if's" only allows government and business to trade rights and freedoms by the pound for an ounce of the appearance of protection.
It should be harder to get user information than it is right now and by all means I do not not mean that child porn should not be at the top of the priority list when things get flagged as child porn, the trouble is all the wrong people tend to have their fingers in all the wrong hole (furgertive pun intended).
A civil suit should not in any way gain private records sorry there's just no reason for it.
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
7. September 2009 @ 18:43 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by DXR88:
you smell that its the smell of the RIAA marching to the DOJ, you can see the stench coming of in waves.
as for Child porn its a morality issue, so to say if i had a daughter and i found out about it you could bet your ass you would never make it to prison.
Well since you don't have a daughter, my guess is that they won't have a problem with you, no?
i was speaking from a fathers point of view, ever visit your girlfriends house only to be welcomed in by this dooming sensation.
besides sending a child pornographer to prison is cruelty. might as well send him to his grave.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
8. September 2009 @ 14:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
How do they figure how to break into a dark net? !!!
I am with Interestx on this one.
It doesn't really matter what I think, I do have a daughter, they have the tools to make them very hard to detect.
For some reason I failed to get outraged over this. The problem is they really do not punish them correctly when they do catch them. I guess I am not outraged that people watch. I am outraged over the initial act.
|
