|
SD Association to show off SDXC at CEATAC 2009
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 29 September, 2009
The SD Association will lead a public technical discussion at CEATAC on October 7. Secure Digital eXtended Capacity (SDXC) cards come in the same size card as regular SD cards, but have the potential to offer up to 2TB storage on a card the size of a stamp. SDXC accelerates SD interface read/write speeds up to 104 megabytes per second.
The SD Association will have a road map for data ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
29. September 2009 @ 23:16 |
Link to this message
|
i find the Whole SD (new extensions here) is confusing as hell for the consumer you have SD SDHC SDIO SDXC not to mention they all look identical.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
29. September 2009 @ 23:42 |
Link to this message
|
99% of the public will be confused by the new "SDXC" bit because it's no different, on the outside, from SD/SDHC cards. At least they are all backwards compatible.
While these will be outrageously expensive when they first are released I could see movies eventually being released on SDXC (or whatever comes out after that) cards due to their high storage potential and decent speed rates.
I wonder how long it will take (and how crazy the price will be) to get 1TB SDXC cards out. Right now the highest capacity is 32GB for an SDHC and they cost $74 to $120 online.
|
Senior Member
28 product reviews
|
30. September 2009 @ 00:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
If these aren't too expensive, which they probably are, I want to get one for my BD-Player, and one for PC backups. 4TB in my pocket, I'm drooling now.
|
Senior Member
2 product reviews
|
30. September 2009 @ 01:06 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by mike.m:
If these aren't too expensive, which they probably are, I want to get one for my BD-Player, and one for PC backups. 4TB in my pocket, I'm drooling now.
Well according to the "SD Association" (see here) SDHC can store up to 32GB and SDXC can store up to 2TB.
Considering 32GB SDHCs are $74+ online, I guess that SDXC cards would start at ~$80 and go way up from there. However, the price of SDHC cards comes down rather quickly so we could possible see $50 1TB SDXC cards in five to ten years.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
30. September 2009 @ 02:17 |
Link to this message
|
I remember that about 3 years ago some company made an announcement that they would have a 1 TB flash drive by late 2008. If they are only a year or two behind, then this might be an ideal format for their new technology.
Also, 32GB SDHC is no longer a high density chip. If not for the 32GB limit, it would not be difficult to make a 64GB (or larger) SDHC card. The only reason that they still cost so much is that they are the largest size currently available. This, combined with the fact that SDXC will not work with most existing devices such as cameras, camcorders, media players, etc should make the price of 64GB cards rather affordable.
"While these will be outrageously expensive when they first are released I could see movies eventually being released on SDXC (or whatever comes out after that) cards due to their high storage potential and decent speed rates."
This would require either a "burned" card or a custom circuit card. Either way, the price is at least half that of reusable flash. Considering that BluRay movies cost less than $2 to make (including case), I doubt we will see a lot of SDXC movies any time soon.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
30. September 2009 @ 08:51 |
Link to this message
|
Yes, very expensive. Just look at the Blue Ray disks. You know they probably cost 10 for a buck to make. It is just a way to extract more from the consumer. Blue Ray movies can fit on a dual layer DVD without much if any image loss. However, there would be no space for adds.
It will be cheaper to put them on yourself. 100 HD movies on a tiny chip!
KillerBug, I remember that new release. I guess that company went under.
|
