|
Women arrested for taping minutes of 'Twilight' film with camera
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 5 December, 2009
A 22-year old woman was arrested in Chicago this week for recording three minutes of the newest "Twilight" film with a digital camera at the movie theater, and spent two days in jail.
Additionally, Samantha Tumpach now faces up to three years in jail after being charged with count of criminal use of a motion picture exhibition.
However, Tumpach says that she wasn't filming the movie ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
|
HUNCHBAK
Newbie
|
5. December 2009 @ 11:13 |
Link to this message
|
@ I love it how america calls itself "land of the free". Yeah right.
This incident proves its turning into a poilce state like nazi germany where people were arrested and sent for years into jail for doing nothing. No crime was committed by her.
Glad I dont live in that socially backward hole of a country.
The managers should of just told her to put the phone away, or leave the cinema.
I hope those police(cowards with guns on a power trip) which arrested her, get shot in the line of duty they deserve it for participating in such an unjust act. What a waste of police resources.
Those managers deserve something like that too.
1st of all you are obviously a young kid and uneducated at that.. Remind me whose country has passed or is passing laws to ban people from the internet permanently? Govt's have tried to limit information since the beginning of time starting in egypt where only royalty was allowed to learn to read and write...europe in the middle ages banned the print and press,etc etc etc. They hated it when they could no longer control it and they are happy they have finally found a way to put the public on there side to control it a little again. And the public eats it up and asks for seconds!! Down with the pirates you all cry,they are the very reason society is going downhill,they are all evil. They have even convinced people that the reasons prices are so high is because of pirates!HAH!! When was the last time you saw a movie exec or a movie star using coupons at the grocery store,I am supposed to be mad ?? With the world economy the way it is I say good for them. If they are surviving in this world without hurting people,stealing from people,selling drugs to people,robbing..well good for them!!
Yeah I agree this situation sux ,I hate the MPAA , and I will even go a step further and say I have no issue with people who do pirate movies. Like it or not they are demonized to make it easier to punish them. They are not thiefs in the sense they they are made out, they don't break into your house and rob you,they don't burglarize stores for movies and resell them. They capture photons,which are gone forever to begin with and then make copies. They also pump a lot of money into the economy by buying tons of blank dvd's,ink cart. for their printers,plastic cases for the movies etc etc... You save 15.00 because you only pay 5.00 and then you go spend it somewhere else . But yeah you're right it's america that is taking all the freedom away from the citizens. By the way, tell me, can you still by firearms in your country little boy?
And by the way..this happened 1 time,which is why it made the news,ok. Now,(in my opinion once is too many) it isn't like America has Herds of cops waiting with clubs in their hands in the movie theaters just waiting and arresting hundreds of people and then trying to pass some B.S. law to ban anyone caught from ever going to the movies again. Which is what YOUR country will try to do now that they can ban you from the internet.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 5. December 2009 @ 11:19
|
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
5. December 2009 @ 11:20 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by HUNCHBAK: @ I love it how america calls itself "land of the free". Yeah right.
This incident proves its turning into a poilce state like nazi germany where people were arrested and sent for years into jail for doing nothing. No crime was committed by her.
Glad I dont live in that socially backward hole of a country.
The managers should of just told her to put the phone away, or leave the cinema.
I hope those police(cowards with guns on a power trip) which arrested her, get shot in the line of duty they deserve it for participating in such an unjust act. What a waste of police resources.
Those managers deserve something like that too.
1st of all you are obviously a young kid and uneducated at that.. Remind me whose country has passed or is passing laws to ban people from the internet permanently? Govt's have tried to limit information since the beginning of time starting in egypt where only royalty was allowed to learn to read and write...europe in the middle ages banned the print and press,etc etc etc. They hated it when they could no longer control it and they are happy they have finally found a way to put the public on there side to control it a little again. And the public eats it up and asks for seconds!! Down with the pirates you all cry,they are the very reason society is going downhill,they are all evil. They have even convinced people that the reasons prices are so high is because of pirates!HAH!! When was the last time you saw a movie exec or a movie star using coupons at the grocery store,I am supposed to be mad ?? With the world economy the way it is I say good for them. If they are surviving in this world without hurting people,stealing from people,selling drugs to people,robbing..well good for them!!
Yeah I agree this situation sux ,I hate the MPAA , and I will even go a step further and say I have no issue with people who do pirate movies. Like it or not they are demonized to make it easier to punish them. They are not thiefs in the sense they they are made out, they don't break into your house and rob you,they don't burglarize stores for movies and resell them. They capture photons,which are gone forever to begin with and then make copies. They also pump a lot of money into the economy by buying tons of blank dvd's,ink cart. for their printers,plastic cases for the movies etc etc... You save 15.00 because you only pay 5.00 and then you go spend it somewhere else . But yeah you're right it's america that is taking all the freedom away from the citizens. By the way, tell me, can you still by firearms in your country little boy?
He has a point the US was all about personal freedom but business via government(government collusion) to get in on revenue streams is restricting our freedoms as much as they can without being caught red handed by the ignorant masses.
Also look at what localities are doing to smokers or even car owners by forcing insurance on them, hell newyork and DC has some of the most bipolar weapons laws ever and yet they have the highest crime rates or housing rules that force low income people out of neighborhoods because the snobs want to pay more taxes.
While we may have more freedoms nationally than UK if you go by region by region we really do not.....
|
|
bomber991
Member
|
5. December 2009 @ 15:25 |
Link to this message
|
Obviously once this case goes before a judge, she'll be found not guilty if what she said is true. They'll play the tape and it will show her filming the little kids with the screen in the background. Then the judge will say "Bring me the idiot that decided it was a good idea to ruin this little girls birthday party".
Except if the sister was 22 then the "little girl" was probably 15-17.
Either way, beer good, mpaa bad.
|
|
KSib
Member
|
5. December 2009 @ 17:37 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Originally posted by KSib:
she doesn't have permission from the producer(s) or developer(s) to make a copy for recreational use.
Recreational use? lol, is she going to roll it up and smoke it?
How you use copyrighted material matters. You can use it for a variety of uses and depending on the use, you may not have to have permission from the creator (like educational).
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
5. December 2009 @ 17:43 |
Link to this message
|
Quote:
Quote:
Originally posted by KSib:
she doesn't have permission from the producer(s) or developer(s) to make a copy for recreational use.
Recreational use? lol, is she going to roll it up and smoke it?
How you use copyrighted material matters. You can use it for a variety of uses and depending on the use, you may not have to have permission from the creator (like educational).
Yes for some strange reason we want CP owners controlling what we may teach kids.... educational and non profit use should be absolutely protected, its not going to stop people from buying it if its well packaged and priced.
|
|
Ragnarok8
Member
|
5. December 2009 @ 19:00 |
Link to this message
|
|
Guess which family and all her friends are never going back to that theater...and possibly any other theater (especially for an event like a birthday) for a very long time? Hope that $500 reward was worth it.
|
Junior Member
|
6. December 2009 @ 02:24 |
Link to this message
|
|
New Digital Video Camera: $399.00
Movie Ticket: $10.00
Recording your sisters birthday party: 3 years in prison
The theater owner needs to drop the charges and issue an apology to this woman and her family. You can bet that this will certainly hurt their business.
I don't feel that piracy hurts the motion picture industry as much as they claim. If anything it helps. I've watched pirated copies before and the quality is to say the least crappy. If the movie is good I go to the theater and watch it or wait and buy the retail version.
|
Senior Member
|
6. December 2009 @ 03:49 |
Link to this message
|
|
couldnt the movie theater manager be charged or something (entrapment maybe).he did put copyrighted material on a giant sized tv while she was innocently filming her sisters birthday party.right behind where she was filming.
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|
|
Matt555
Newbie
1 product review
|
6. December 2009 @ 13:24 |
Link to this message
|
|
They should all be arrested because they went to go see Twilight. That is all.
|
|
Mythblstr
Newbie
|
6. December 2009 @ 13:25 |
Link to this message
|
The Theater that prosecuted her with a felony is Muvico Theaters
They have theaters in: Hialeah Florida, Tampa Florida
Palm Harbor Florida,
Pompano Beach Florida
St. Petersburg Florida,
West Palm Beach Florida
Boca Raton Florida
Thousand Oaks California,
Rosemont Illinois
|
|
scum101
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
6. December 2009 @ 16:25 |
Link to this message
|
Florida
* Muvico Palm Harbor 10 ? Palm Harbor, FL (1995) (Greek Courtyard in lobby)
* Muvico Hialeah 14 ? Hialeah, FL (November 13, 1996) (No theme)
* Muvico Pompano 18 ? Pompano Beach, FL (September 18, 1998) (50's drive in theme)
* Muvico Starlight 20 ? Tampa, FL (October 16, 1999) (50's drive in theme)
* Muvico Centro Ybor 20 ? Tampa, FL (October 5, 2000) (Cuban theme)
* Muvico BayWalk 20 (I-MAX location) ? St. Petersburg, FL (November 17, 2000) (Mediterranean theme)
* Muvico Parisian 20 (I-MAX location) ? West Palm Beach, FL (December 22, 2000) (French Opera House theme)
[edit] Illinois
* Muvico Rosemont 18 ? Rosemont, IL (September 14, 2007) (Grand palace theme)
[edit] California
* Muvico Thousand Oaks 14 ? Thousand Oaks, CA (February 27, 2009) (Parisian theme)
boycott the bastards.. flyposting is a good way to hurt these "entertainment" businesses.
|
|
xtago
Senior Member
|
7. December 2009 @ 02:25 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by bomber991: Obviously once this case goes before a judge, she'll be found not guilty if what she said is true. They'll play the tape and it will show her filming the little kids with the screen in the background. Then the judge will say "Bring me the idiot that decided it was a good idea to ruin this little girls birthday party".
It won't get dropped it;ll be a case of getting fined or something as buying a ticket mean you agree to all the rules and they don't allow cams in so she will have broken the agreement for a start.
overall though I find it a bit odd that they are trying to video people in a dark room for a birthday party, maybe on a mobile phone which are utter crap in dark rooms for recording people.
recording over 15 or 30 seconds of anything copyright can mean you need to pay money but below is fine.
she'll get done just what the end result is who knows.
|
Senior Member
|
7. December 2009 @ 05:43 |
Link to this message
|
Quote: It won't get dropped it;ll be a case of getting fined or something as buying a ticket mean you agree to all the rules and they don't allow cams in so she will have broken the agreement for a start.
overall though I find it a bit odd that they are trying to video people in a dark room for a birthday party, maybe on a mobile phone which are utter crap in dark rooms for recording people.
recording over 15 or 30 seconds of anything copyright can mean you need to pay money but below is fine.
she'll get done just what the end result is who knows.
I didn't think they print the terms and conditions on the ticket and unless they have a sign stating the terms and conditions(which i doubt they did) she can argue she didnt know cameras were'nt allowed.THey should have a giant sign saying if you record the movie you will face criminal prosecution
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|
|
siber
Member
|
7. December 2009 @ 10:54 |
Link to this message
|
|
If you are arrested for doing something you didn?t realize was against the law the judge will often tell you that ?ignorance of the law is no excuse?.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
7. December 2009 @ 10:56 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by siber: If you are arrested for doing something you didn?t realize was against the law the judge will often tell you that ?ignorance of the law is no excuse?.
Ya but when thinking in public is a crime and no one let the public know......
Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Lets renegotiate them.
|
|
siber
Member
|
7. December 2009 @ 11:14 |
Link to this message
|
|
Didn't say I agreed. It's just the way it is.
|
|
scum101
Suspended due to non-functional email address
|
7. December 2009 @ 11:19 |
Link to this message
|
"ignorance of the law is no excuse" .. is perfectly fine, but ONLY when something is obviously wrong.. stealing a car or battering somebody to death.. simple logic dictates those actions to be wrong (unless the battering was in self defence)
Filming your kids birthday? .. how could anybody think that would possibly be illegal? A harmless activity.. so "ignorance is no excuse" really doesn't come into this. Not being aware of a pretty much unknown law in circumstances where any right thinking person would see the activity as 100% harmless is a prefect defence.
Yet another reason to NEVER go to the movies.. NEVER buy any and ALWAYS get your entertainment from other sources..
hehehe.. and I didn't even mention the complete load of crap the big cartel have made the last 4 years.. nothing worth watching.. at all..
|
|
siber
Member
|
7. December 2009 @ 12:20 |
Link to this message
|
"simple logic dictates those actions to be wrong (unless the battering was in self defence)".
I would personally vote for you to become the most influential British Judge of the 21st Century. I couldn't agree more with the common sense of your argument.
Unfortunately, we are dealing with a different historical reality. The principle of "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" is old and established since Roman Times.
WIKIPEDIA:Ignorantia juris non excusat(Latin for "ignorance of the law does not excuse" or "ignorance of the law excuses no one") is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely because he or she was unaware of its content.
The judge who - very appropriately, in my humble opinion - decides that this woman did nothing wrong and had no intent to do harm, could be dealing with appeal after appeal from the RIAA, the loss of his reputation, and whatever the 'Powers In Charge' want to do to him/her. He/she is most likely to condemn. What a mess.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
7. December 2009 @ 12:30 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by siber: "simple logic dictates those actions to be wrong (unless the battering was in self defence)".
I would personally vote for you to become the most influential British Judge of the 21st Century. I couldn't agree more with the common sense of your argument.
Unfortunately, we are dealing with a different historical reality. The principle of "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" is old and established since Roman Times.
WIKIPEDIA:Ignorantia juris non excusat(Latin for "ignorance of the law does not excuse" or "ignorance of the law excuses no one") is a legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely because he or she was unaware of its content.
The judge who - very appropriately, in my humble opinion - decides that this woman did nothing wrong and had no intent to do harm, could be dealing with appeal after appeal from the RIAA, the loss of his reputation, and whatever the 'Powers In Charge' want to do to him/her. He/she is most likely to condemn. What a mess.
True but what about old anti Wicca/whichisim laws that forbid mroe than 4 females being in a single residence?
I think that it being a matter of law is ridiculous, its like shooting your daughters new boyfriend when he was sneaking around the house/yard to talk to her. you can;t shoot im until he runs leaving her knocked up or B gets heavy handed with her. :P
Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Lets renegotiate them.
|
|
siber
Member
|
7. December 2009 @ 12:52 |
Link to this message
|
|
I don't disagree, ZippyDSM. I don't mean to tell you that the principles of "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" or "anti Wicca/whichisim (New to me!) laws that forbid more than 4 females being in a single residence" are correct and represent fine examples of Western Civilization. I just expect that they will be used to determine the outcome for this poor woman, if we like it or not...
|
Senior Member
|
7. December 2009 @ 13:55 |
Link to this message
|
Ignorance of the law is no excuse... but it's a damn good extenuating circumstance!
More often than not, being found guilty "by accident" results in some form of "learning" punishment, as in, a small fine and having to take "anti-piracy" class...
Yes the law exists and if the judge finds her to have broken the law then she is guilty, but he does not have to ruin her life due to an accident.
Write a bad check and show the judge that it was an accident... you get a slap on the wrist and have to take "budget class".
The real problem here is the fact that this is elevated to a criminal matter. It never should be so.
The owner of the film has every right to request that no one film it and the owner of the theater has every right to not allow filming inside of his theater... but neither is a criminal offense. It's "breaking the rules" and should result in nothing more than being kicked out of the theater or some kind of civil suit from the movie owner.
But the MPAA has been given the power to prosecute CRIMINALLY... and that is the real problem here.
And oh, since this is criminal, once the girl was reported to the cops the theater no longer has the ability to "drop the charges".
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
7. December 2009 @ 14:00 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by siber: I don't disagree, ZippyDSM. I don't mean to tell you that the principles of "Ignorance of the law is no excuse" or "anti Wicca/whichisim (New to me!) laws that forbid more than 4 females being in a single residence" are correct and represent fine examples of Western Civilization. I just expect that they will be used to determine the outcome for this poor woman, if we like it or not...
Texas had or has a anti vibrator law can't have more than 3 or 4, some laws are out moded or just stupid.
When it comes to dealing with cops you have no choice but to bend over they are their for enforcement and little else, however if you have the chance in court its a whole other ball game.
Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Lets renegotiate them.
|
|
siber
Member
|
7. December 2009 @ 14:45 |
Link to this message
|
|
Glad you told me about the vibrators. I know somebody who was thinking about getting five of them. I'll have to put out a "Heads Up".
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
8. December 2009 @ 06:25 |
Link to this message
|
|
It will not be long before they outlaw breathing air...then they can arrest anyone they want whenever they want without cause, to put into forced labor. They already have the forced labor...and they keep making crimes out of innocent activities for no reason other than this.
The USA is called "The land of the free" - but even Autistic 5 year olds know better. We also call our government a democracy, even though it started as a repbulic and has turned into a dictatorship...and has never been a democracy. We even say "Under God" in the pledge of allegiance...when we all know that this nation serves a much darker master...man.
|
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
8. December 2009 @ 13:31 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by KillerBug: It will not be long before they outlaw breathing air...then they can arrest anyone they want whenever they want without cause, to put into forced labor. They already have the forced labor...and they keep making crimes out of innocent activities for no reason other than this.
The USA is called "The land of the free" - but even Autistic 5 year olds know better. We also call our government a democracy, even though it started as a repbulic and has turned into a dictatorship...and has never been a democracy. We even say "Under God" in the pledge of allegiance...when we all know that this nation serves a much darker master...man.
Well democracy has a good ring to it till one realizes its mob rule...... I wish we could go back to a more rebulpic setup and for gods sake get the house and sentante to run on 40% rule, if all it takes 40-50% majority to change things they would not screw up so much.....
Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Lets renegotiate them.
|