User User name Password  
   
Tuesday 30.9.2025 / 19:41
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > announcements > news comments > appeals court upholds decision against microsoft
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
Appeals court upholds decision against Microsoft
  Jump to:
 
The following comments relate to this news article:

Appeals court upholds decision against Microsoft

article published on 14 March, 2010

The U.S. Federal Court of Appeals has upheld the jury verdict against Microsoft in its patent case with small company i4i, over the customizable XML used in Microsoft's extremely popular Word processor. With the ruling upheld, Microsoft must pay i4i $240 million USD, as well as continue to sell Word 2003 and 2007 stripped of certain custom XML features. "A reasonable jury could have ... [ read the full article ]

Please read the original article before posting your comments.
Posted Message
Senior Member
_
14. March 2010 @ 09:29 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Refreshing to see a patent lawsuit where there is actually infringement.
Advertisement
_
__
Member
_
14. March 2010 @ 11:48 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
240M is still a slap on the wrist to M$. I think its sad that someone sharing files on their pc would be hit with a 200M+ judgment that they could never pay back and is clearly stomping all over their rights for sharing a handful of songs for free. Also there is no conclusive evidence that they made anyone lose money as the corporate fat cats are pulling numbers out of their ass. Now you take a huge corporation that has SOLD hundreds of millions of copies of software for substantial profit that infringes on the little guy's patents for YEARS AND YEARS and has clearly completely devalued their property but they get charged with what would amount to a drop in the bucket. Our justice system is far too corrupt. They make harsh judgments against average people that would ruin their lives and give the corporate fat cats a slap on the wrist for doing the exact same thing and actually PROFITING from it by a large margin. M$ didn't just rob i4i they raped them and then donkey punched them when they were done but their punishment will not fit their crimes.

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 14. March 2010 @ 11:48

Mysttic
Senior Member
_
14. March 2010 @ 14:27 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I agree with the punishment did not fit the crime, MS previous sales will also not get affected from this ruling as they already made their $ off it. i4i may as well be dead, as even after winning, what's to do now? I doubt they'll partner up with MS, and if they did, MS would just look for reasons to get rid of em anyways.
juventini
Member
_
14. March 2010 @ 15:56 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Poor Micro$oft
xnonsuchx
Senior Member
_
14. March 2010 @ 21:46 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
M$ shouldn't appeal a slap on the wrist...like Intel's $1.2 Billion payment to AMD was almost nothing!
llongtheD
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
14. March 2010 @ 22:41 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Anyone see a slight price increase on the next version of office coming? Everyone knows this cost will be passed right down to consumers.
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
_
19. March 2010 @ 08:40 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
I am sure i4i can use 240 million. I do wish it was bigger or better yet send some of that loot my way!
pmshah
Member
_
19. March 2010 @ 09:39 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
The judge should have based the award on number of copies sold multiplied by whatever $ 10, 20, 50 or 100.

M$ did it with impunity and must be made to suffer to the extreme.
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
Newbie
_
2. April 2010 @ 12:52 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by pmshah:
The judge should have based the award on number of copies sold multiplied by whatever $ 10, 20, 50 or 100.

M$ did it with impunity and must be made to suffer to the extreme.
Correct, that's what they would do to Joe small guy.

And I'm not a "Newbie", I've been a member since '05 ... I believe.

I just had an "account reset" due to an e-mail issue.

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 2. April 2010 @ 12:55

afterdawn.com > forums > announcements > news comments > appeals court upholds decision against microsoft
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork