'Twilight' cam 'pirate' sues movie theater
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 3 July, 2010
In December of last year we reported that a 22-year old woman was arrested in Chicago for recording three minutes of the newest "Twilight" film with a digital camera at the movie theater, and was forced to spend two days in jail awaiting a hearing.
Samantha Tumpach faced up to three years in jail after being charged for criminal use of a motion picture exhibition.
Making the situation ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
scorpNZ
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
3. July 2010 @ 13:44 |
Link to this message
|
Only 50 grand is it even worth it the lawyers fees wil cost that & more me thinks more so if it gets dragged out
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
Member
|
3. July 2010 @ 14:17 |
Link to this message
|
Just in general, if you're going to sue, include legal fees so you're covered there too.
|
Mysttic
Senior Member
|
3. July 2010 @ 14:42 |
Link to this message
|
It will be covered. The victor usually gets legal fee's covered on top of $50,000. Still considering the MPAA and RIAA try for millions, I would have at least sued for $500,000. Sure you'd never get it, but at least you prolly get more than $50,000.
|
xaznboitx
Senior Member
|
3. July 2010 @ 17:09 |
Link to this message
|
oh I read this last year, I hope she sues them
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 3. July 2010 @ 17:10
|
Senior Member
|
4. July 2010 @ 06:16 |
Link to this message
|
i said it at the time she had the charges dropped and i will say it again.she should be suing for slandering.she was labelled as a pirate and criminal all over the internet.im in australia and i know her name from the article.just thing how many other people have heard of her.
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|
baxter00
Member
|
4. July 2010 @ 07:49 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by xboxdvl2: i said it at the time she had the charges dropped and i will say it again.she should be suing for slandering.she was labelled as a pirate and criminal all over the internet.im in australia and i know her name from the article.just thing how many other people have heard of her.
I agree with you there. Just the phrase "filming twilight" and I already knew what the article was about. She should file for slander as well.
|
ntense69
Member
|
4. July 2010 @ 12:34 |
Link to this message
|
get them for the most and anything the court has cost you depression,worry,money,food,lawyer fees anything they deserve getting it slammed in their face just like they do other taxpayers
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
6. July 2010 @ 00:46 |
Link to this message
|
I love it...she should also sue them for piracy; as they made copies of her video without her permission!
|
Junior Member
|
6. July 2010 @ 13:54 |
Link to this message
|
surprised the RIAA didn't try and sue for a public performance of happy birthday seems like something they would do.
but ya should should have asked for alot more.
|
juventini
Member
|
6. July 2010 @ 17:50 |
Link to this message
|
Goes around comes around.
|
juventini
Member
|
6. July 2010 @ 17:50 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by jos22: surprised the RIAA didn't try and sue for a public performance of happy birthday seems like something they would do.
but ya should should have asked for alot more.
True
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
7. July 2010 @ 00:41 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by jos22: surprised the RIAA didn't try and sue for a public performance of happy birthday seems like something they would do.
They would have, but they were too busy trying to build a case against her and her horrible crime that deprived them of so many sales.
|
Tarsellis
Member
|
9. July 2010 @ 09:50 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by xboxdvl2: i said it at the time she had the charges dropped and i will say it again.she should be suing for slandering.she was labelled as a pirate and criminal all over the internet.im in australia and i know her name from the article.just thing how many other people have heard of her.
We also need to add libel, false imprisonment, racketeering, punitive damages and demand to "Make an example" of them as they do to us.
When this case gets thrown out and they refuse to prosecute, it will just again show that our legal system is NOT abut justice, but corporate fascist protection and perpetuation of economic slavery.
|
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
|
12. July 2010 @ 15:06 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by scorpNZ: Only 50 grand is it even worth it the lawyers fees wil cost that & more me thinks more so if it gets dragged out
No, her lawyer will likely work for a cut of the profits and the amount will go up drastically ( a few thousand times) when she gets her lawyer.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 12. July 2010 @ 15:08
|
Senior Member
|
1. August 2010 @ 08:01 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by KillerBug: I love it...she should also sue them for piracy; as they made copies of her video without her permission!
LOL, good one killer
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
Senior Member
|
1. August 2010 @ 09:38 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by R: She's taking a big chance here. She did record part of the movie, so she was guilty of the crime she was held for. The case was dropped due to bad publicity, not due to her being innocent. Even though she didn't have criminal intent, she did commit the crime. If I walk out of the grocery store without paying for my gallon of milk, I've committed a crime regardless of whether my intent was to steal the milk or if I was just being absent minded. If the MPAA has the option of reinstating the charges, this could totally backfire on her.
That said, it's a good gamble. She has no case, but she clearly has public opinion on her side. Just check out the comments here. The MPAA could give her a settlement just to appease public opinion.
yes but if the checkout operater packed a carton of milk in your shopping bag and didnt charge you for it then they can't charge you for shop lifting.just like if im filming a birthday party and someone puts a copyrighted film on in the background.I'd be filming the party so it wouldnt be my fault if a movie ended up in the background.
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|