User User name Password  
   
Thursday 2.10.2025 / 17:22
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > announcements > news comments > hulu viewership nosedives after comscore changes methods
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
Hulu viewership nosedives after comScore changes methods
  Jump to:
 
The following comments relate to this news article:

Hulu viewership nosedives after comScore changes methods

article published on 28 July, 2010

Hulu, the United States' long-time second most popular streaming video site saw its viewership nosedive for the month ended June 30th, after comScore changed their measurement methods. In May, the site had an estimated 44 million viewers, says comScore, with that number falling to 24 million in June. The giant drop was the largest of any of the top Internet video sites, dropping the ... [ read the full article ]

Please read the original article before posting your comments.
Posted Message
AfterDawn Addict

1 product review
_
29. July 2010 @ 04:10 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Yup...when you can get to the video page, just to get a message that it is not supported on your device just because they are being ***holes, that counts as a view. At this point, I don't even care if they remove their android blocking, I will never go back to those pricks ever again.
Advertisement
_
__
Member
_
29. July 2010 @ 12:17 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
who uses it anyway, people have private media servers these days
AfterDawn Addict

1 product review
_
29. July 2010 @ 12:23 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
If it worked with android and iphone, then at least they could get a piece of the mobile market...but they block android, and apple has no flash!
Slippster
Newbie
_
2. August 2010 @ 12:06 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
lets not ignore the 800 pound gorilla standing in the room:
COMMERCIAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN THE PAID CONTENT!
people are bailing on hulu because they put commercials in the programs even after you become a member!

they seem to be using the cable tv model of doing business;
you buy access, then watch tv with commercials included.

but this is the internet!
not television.
i simply REFUSE to go down that road.

hulu is o-k for free to watch old night gallery shows,
but when i heard that paid members STILL get commercials in the programming ...well that just sucks balls!

hulu can suck it.
there i said it.
and so many others share my sentiments...
NETFLIX FTW !! SDMF \\nn//
AfterDawn Addict

7 product reviews
_
2. August 2010 @ 12:28 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Meh, I blocked the ads with Peerblock. Now I simply wait 30 seconds for my video to resume :S But I just finished "Kyle Xy", so I don't know yet if there's a reason for me to have hulu stream me videos again. Probably would have watched them on netflix, but unfortunately netflix is not currently streaming Kyle xy...
Kyle Xy is incredible! ;)
Senior Member
_
2. August 2010 @ 13:40 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by Slippster:
lets not ignore the 800 pound gorilla standing in the room:
COMMERCIAL ADVERTISEMENTS IN THE PAID CONTENT!
people are bailing on hulu because they put commercials in the programs even after you become a member!

they seem to be using the cable tv model of doing business;
you buy access, then watch tv with commercials included.

but this is the internet!
not television.
i simply REFUSE to go down that road.

hulu is o-k for free to watch old night gallery shows,
but when i heard that paid members STILL get commercials in the programming ...well that just sucks balls!

hulu can suck it.
there i said it.
and so many others share my sentiments...
NETFLIX FTW !! SDMF \\nn//
Concisely said!
six60six
Junior Member
_
2. August 2010 @ 20:18 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
so, there are commercials in their paid service? that is lamesauce.
gwhiz
Newbie
_
3. August 2010 @ 16:07 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by Zealousi:
who uses it anyway, people have private media servers these days
Yes, I do. Unfortunately, if you want a broadband connection with a decent upload speed for video streaming, you have to pay through the nose for it. My $35/Mo AT&T DSL is ~3.5Mbps download and a whopping 50Kbps upload (measured).
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
IguanaC64
Member
_
16. August 2010 @ 14:16 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Since people in the US don't consider it important to upgrade bandwidth, the best net speed in my neighborhood is too slow to view streaming video. Embarq/Centurylink hasn't upgraded my 512k DSL service in 8 years...I don't see it getting better any time soon.

I don't make this comment as a complaint really, just stating a fact that many areas who would LIKE to use services like Hulu and Netflix cannot.

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 16. August 2010 @ 14:18

afterdawn.com > forums > announcements > news comments > hulu viewership nosedives after comscore changes methods
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork