|
Warner Bros. investigating into 36 minute leak of latest Harry Potter film
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 17 November, 2010
Yesterday, we reported that the first 36 minutes of the latest Harry Potter film was made widely available on the Internet, via a leak.
Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part 1, will debut in the U.S. on Friday and is in theaters in some countries already.
The "extended clip," which is tagged as a DVD-Screener, has a large Warner Bros. watermark but is an otherwise intact first ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
17. November 2010 @ 22:39 |
Link to this message
|
|
It must be a terrible movie...I mean, really really bad.
Why do I say that?
Because it is the first 36 minutes. If it is any good, then it would only serve as an extended trailer to the movie. This can only hurt sales if the movie sucks.
|
|
Advertisement
|
 |
|
|
|
elbald90
Member
|
18. November 2010 @ 04:40 |
Link to this message
|
|
i strongly believe that this was leaked on purpose
|
|
biglo30
Senior Member
|
18. November 2010 @ 10:42 |
Link to this message
|
|
That 36 minutes of film was deliberately release by them to try and track the users who will be sharing it. I don't know why anyone would want to get a 30 min snippet of a movie but I'm pretty sure there are some numb skulls out there who would.
|
|
Tristan_2
Member
|
18. November 2010 @ 11:42 |
Link to this message
|
I hate to say it but I think it was leaked on purpose especially if it has a WB watermark which no Movie Leak has. I'm more skeptical about the Kingdom Hearts Birth By Sleep leak as it is due to the fact the Mysterious Figure Boss was more tough in the leak then the final product which only Square can do.
I'm guessing like most movie leaks is an employee gave the film to someone(or similar case like Wolverine) then the person leaked it, Its simple if we think on it this way. PLUS Harry Potter is NOT Warner Bros Property Its Rowlings(despite her possibly using others ideas but is in such denial on it) This is why Copyright IS SOOOOO STUPID Companies have this BIG ego on their "Property"
|
|
dEwMe
Senior Member
|
18. November 2010 @ 13:19 |
Link to this message
|
|
LOL...If you get sued or prosecuted for the first 36 min of a movie you deserve it for being stupid.
Just my $0.02,
dEwMe
|
Senior Member
|
18. November 2010 @ 17:28 |
Link to this message
|
|
A part of a part of a movie..
We must go deeper.
|
|
joetheplumber
Newbie
|
19. November 2010 @ 19:50 |
Link to this message
|
|
at least the time served want be hard labor! well of course it could be hard bending over in a US jail
|
Newbie
|
20. November 2010 @ 00:49 |
Link to this message
|
|
Saw the clip on a site and passed it by. Didn't see the point. Warner should consider it a teaser for the rabid Potter crowd.
|
|
Advertisement
|
|
|
Member
|
20. November 2010 @ 18:13 |
Link to this message
|
I think everyone is just wanting to see how Emma Watsons' ever evolving hot lil bod is coming along before they shell out the $$$ for the whole movie...
@Tristan_2 - Uhhh...Rowlings owns the rights to the HP franchise but the studios purchase the movie rights from her (corporation actually), so in legalese, WB certainly owns the rights on that clip. They have such "big ego's" because they paid mucho-millions for said license on the movie(s).
I'll still d'load it from Demonoid tho...;)
LOL
|
