BPI wants Google, search engines to censor illegal downloads
|
|
The following comments relate to this news article:
article published on 17 December, 2010
The British Phonographic Industry (BPI), besides posting huge piracy numbers for the UK, has also taken shots at Google, claiming the search engine is used just as often as P2P apps for illegal downloads.
Furthermore, the trade group would like Google and other engines to censor their search results and instead push legal services like iTunes, Amazon and others.
Says the BPI (via TF): ... [ read the full article ]
Please read the original article before posting your comments.
|
Member
|
17. December 2010 @ 01:34 |
Link to this message
|
Is it me, or has the 'crackdown' on piracy and censorship in general become far more flamboyant since Wikileaks became mainstream?
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 17. December 2010 @ 01:34
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
Member
|
17. December 2010 @ 01:55 |
Link to this message
|
Coincidental timing.
They're also trying to make a big fuss about piracy around the holiday season season to scare morons into buying things instead of downloading them.
This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 17. December 2010 @ 01:57
|
Senior Member
|
17. December 2010 @ 02:30 |
Link to this message
|
if britain has a problem with google then they can block it.every week on here some group is trying to shut down or intimadate a website which is hosted in another country.If its not hosted in your country you should have no right to do anything to it (not sure about in reality,in theory that should apply).
custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
|
bankai987
Junior Member
|
17. December 2010 @ 02:50 |
Link to this message
|
This sounds like 1984. The music industry wanting the government to dip their hands in everything.
|
dEwMe
Senior Member
|
17. December 2010 @ 11:05 |
Link to this message
|
Google and the like are just search engines. They are not nor should they be responsible for the legality or otherwise of the sites your search turns up. What is this China, Iran...?
Just my $0.02,
dEwMe
|
Senior Member
4 product reviews
|
17. December 2010 @ 12:25 |
Link to this message
|
BPI is making the biggest mistake of its life, you can sue dead grannies,coping machines, ex college students, and poor people. simply because they can't afford the best lawyer and legal advisory committee.
Google can and will crush BPI under its iron fists make no mistake of that.
Powered By

|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
17. December 2010 @ 12:35 |
Link to this message
|
When you can't make them buy call them terrorists and enforce media consumption at penalty of law.
Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Lets renegotiate them.
|
Member
|
17. December 2010 @ 17:13 |
Link to this message
|
Not only is wikileaks rolling in the traffic on a global basis, Google is doing it's job surprise surprise. Would Google be popular if it did not search for what your looking for, what is blocking a keyword going to reduce the end result. It will just screw up normal searches due to the search is keyword based as everyone knows.
Until the internet is not a open battlefield, there will all ways be a way and when one shuts down 5 pop up with 1 of them being the next big site to replace the one shutdown.
Face it, your outnumbered. The community will all ways get it's way because we have to and we do not rest until we have control over our freedom.
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
17. December 2010 @ 23:49 |
Link to this message
|
Originally posted by Zealousi: Not only is wikileaks rolling in the traffic on a global basis, Google is doing it's job surprise surprise. Would Google be popular if it did not search for what your looking for, what is blocking a keyword going to reduce the end result. It will just screw up normal searches due to the search is keyword based as everyone knows.
Until the internet is not a open battlefield, there will all ways be a way and when one shuts down 5 pop up with 1 of them being the next big site to replace the one shutdown.
Face it, your outnumbered. The community will all ways get it's way because we have to and we do not rest until we have control over our freedom.
But google is starting to mess with results based on piracy and fake child porn.
Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Lets renegotiate them.
|
AfterDawn Addict
1 product review
|
18. December 2010 @ 02:05 |
Link to this message
|
...Then screw google. If they want to filter results, we will just go elsewhere. The record companies have already lost most of us due to a laundry list of incompetent blunders and policies...now they are going around trying to get others to make the same mistakes. Give the people what they want, when they want it, and for a fair price (or for a free service, without too many advertisements). Fail to do this, and people will start getting the exact same service from someone else for a better deal. This is the foundation of capitalism.
|
Advertisement
|
  |
|
AfterDawn Addict
4 product reviews
|
18. December 2010 @ 02:36 |
Link to this message
|
Dumbing down the masses to do as the few say is also capitalism....
Copyright infringement is nothing more than civil disobedience to a bad set of laws. Lets renegotiate them.
|