User User name Password  
   
Wednesday 8.10.2025 / 11:08
Search AfterDawn Forums:        In English   Suomeksi   På svenska
afterdawn.com > forums > announcements > news comments > u.s. will treat cyber-attacks as act of war
Show topics
 
Forums
Forums
U.S. will treat cyber-attacks as act of war
  Jump to:
 
The following comments relate to this news article:

U.S. will treat cyber-attacks as act of war

article published on 1 June, 2011

The Pentagon is set to publish a report on measures to tackle and respond to cyber warfare. A cyber-attack last month targeting U.S. defense contractor Lockheed Martin has hastened the Pentagon's steps on the cyber-warfare plans. A report, due in a matter of weeks, is expected to deem cyber-attacks as an act of war, and to suggest whatever measures necessary to defend the country's infrastructure. ... [ read the full article ]

Please read the original article before posting your comments.
Posted Message
Senior Member
_
1. June 2011 @ 18:22 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   

X360 - iXtreme1.4 ||| Xbox - EvoX Dash ||| PS2 - CC 2.0 PRO SLE ||| Dreamcast ...lol ||| NDS - Acekard 2/M3 Simply/EZ Flash 3-1 ||| Rooted HTC Hero with Ic3rom
Advertisement
_
__
shortybob
Member
_
1. June 2011 @ 19:36 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
That's friggin scary.
Member
_
1. June 2011 @ 19:38 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Wait until the US gets Chinese styled censorship; it's not too far off.
devilzpsp
Junior Member
_
1. June 2011 @ 22:42 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Die Hard 4?

DEVILZ TEARS
elbald90
Member
_
2. June 2011 @ 01:54 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
what doesn't the U.S. consider an act of war nowadays ?

xnonsuchx
Senior Member
_
2. June 2011 @ 02:34 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by elbald90:
what doesn't the U.S. consider an act of war nowadays ?


Corporations who help our enemies and pay enough $$$ for officials to look the other way.
AfterDawn Addict

1 product review
_
2. June 2011 @ 04:55 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by elbald90:
what doesn't the U.S. consider an act of war nowadays ?

Attacking a country that has done nothing to us...that isn't an act of war; otherwise, congress would have to approve of it before Osama Bin Obama starts killing people.

In fact, nothing that the government does is terrorism, warfare, murder, extortion, slavery, torture, or monopoly...because doublethink only lets us see the evil enemy as doing such things.



xtago
Senior Member
_
3. June 2011 @ 05:44 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by ROMaster2:
Wait until the US gets Chinese styled censorship; it's not too far off.
Won't happen as they are completely against that.

They are busting Australia's balls for talking about doing a national filter.
AfterDawn Addict
_
3. June 2011 @ 07:12 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
America only declares war on people/places that either have oil or cannot defend themselves

Gif by Phantom69


casurratt
Junior Member
_
3. June 2011 @ 13:13 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Yeah..way to give any potential "war" mongerers ideas for where to hit us where it hurts. Our government really IS just throwing in the towel.
bogwart16
Member
_
3. June 2011 @ 13:55 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
So presumably the DoD will be OK with Iran attacking the US, following the Stuxnet worm attack?

We once had a empire and it was led by an emperor then we had a kingdom which was led by a king. Now we have a country.
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
_
3. June 2011 @ 15:03 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Shortybob, it is all in a dazs work. A cyber attack could be very damaging here is an interesting article. What a cyber attack can do
Probably the Chinese have better hackers than the US but they have more bombs.

Freedompatriot, that is true with any terrorist attack.

Right, Killerbug nothing has really changed but the retoric. The only persons who might be scared off are the hackers out for a joy ride. They might not want to risk a bullet between the eyes for that. The government hackers and the terrorists could care less.

pulsar that makes sense to me! You don't want to make war on someone that can level a few big cities.

This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 3. June 2011 @ 15:58

Emudude1963
Newbie
_
3. June 2011 @ 18:46 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Except for China. China performed a Cyber Attack to All American Google G-Mail accounts last week, but the attack was dismissed by the Obama Administration. I Guess this only counts if one of our Ally Countries like Israel, Great Brittan, France, Germany, Australia, or any other Western Country Hacks us. If it is Communist or Islamist Country like China, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, or any other such country, the Obama Administration and Eric Holder are O.K. with it for Diversity's Sake.

Saving the Universe, One Computer at a time.
llongtheD
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
4. June 2011 @ 01:38 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Originally posted by elbald90:
what doesn't the U.S. consider an act of war nowadays ?

Anything that doesn't have a large enough payday for our big "defense" contractors. If there is a big payday, watch the f**k out!

If your fish seems sick, put it back in the water.
AfterDawn Addict
_
4. June 2011 @ 03:18 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Britain too has a habit of ignoring the more difficult countries to invade too. When Robert Mugabe started evicting & killing white farmers, they did nothing. When he started bulldozing peoples homes, killing people, ruining a once prosperous and wealthy country, they did nothing. Recently there have been uprisings in various countries, Tunisia, Egypt, Syria, Yemen, who could forget the Tianamen square massacre? The tibetan monks protests. Human rights abuses in many, many countries. All these are selectively ignored. Why not invade all the above countries in the name of democracy? Oh, hang on, China has a massive army and lots of money. When America made the Palestinians elections, Hamas was voted in. Immediately, America would not recognise the Government, despite the people voting for it! The Palestine/Israel conflict will never end. Why is Libya been targeted?, the people fighting are conveniently called rebels, in other countries they are called terrorists (oil is the key again, just as in Iraq. Which companies won the oil contracts in Iraq? America). One mans freedom fighter is another mans terrorist. This constant interfering, trying to instill "democracy" is causing more trouble & resentment in the world, No wonder America and Britain are resented. This is why other European countries try to distant themselves from our actions & are unwilling to commit troops etc. The Brits would follow the Americans over a cliff. So much for the "special relationship". It is very easy to make ones' own distinguishes in who should be classed as a terrorist or a freedom fighter. Usually the decision is a political/economical one.

When will we ever learn?

Gif by Phantom69


This message has been edited since posting. Last time this message was edited on 4. June 2011 @ 03:20

Senior Member
_
4. June 2011 @ 04:04 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
america would gain nothing by invading china and they know they probably wouldnt pull it off anyway.chinas army is the most powerful in the world followed closely by the american army.the people in countries like afghanistan and iraq dont have the money or support to fight the american army.

custom built gaming pc from early 2010,ps2 with 15 games all original,ps3 500gbs with 5 games all original,yamaha amp and 5.1channel surround sound speakers,46inch sony lcd smart tv.
llongtheD
Suspended due to non-functional email address
_
4. June 2011 @ 21:43 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
Does this mean suspected hackers could be targeted by drone strikes?

If your fish seems sick, put it back in the water.
Advertisement
_
__
 
_
Mez
AfterDawn Addict
_
6. June 2011 @ 14:49 _ Link to this message    Send private message to this user   
pulsar, sane countries attack weak countries only rabid countries attack a country that will annihilate them.

China surely spends more on their military and less on social entitlements than the US that still spends way less than the rest of Europe on social entitlements. They are getting there rapidly. GB is down to only 5% of their budget is on ?defense?.

Democracies just reflect the opinion of the public. Both the US and GB stupidly think all people think as they do and that the evil a country does is the work of only one man. I saw a very disturbing survey result from Egypt. Greater than 99% of the persons surveyed believed in religious freedom. However, subsequent questions show that was only for persons that thought exactly like they did everyone else needs to die including other sects of Islam, who of course blaspheme with untruths!
afterdawn.com > forums > announcements > news comments > u.s. will treat cyber-attacks as act of war
 

Digital video: AfterDawn.com | AfterDawn Forums
Music: MP3Lizard.com
Gaming: Blasteroids.com | Blasteroids Forums | Compare game prices
Software: Software downloads
Blogs: User profile pages
RSS feeds: AfterDawn.com News | Software updates | AfterDawn Forums
International: AfterDawn in Finnish | AfterDawn in Swedish | AfterDawn in Norwegian | download.fi
Navigate: Search | Site map
About us: About AfterDawn Ltd | Advertise on our sites | Rules, Restrictions, Legal disclaimer & Privacy policy
Contact us: Send feedback | Contact our media sales team
 
  © 1999-2025 by AfterDawn Ltd.

  IDG TechNetwork